Author Topic: Simpson Marriage needed totally baffled  (Read 3362 times)

Offline DavyTee68

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 426
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Simpson Marriage needed totally baffled
« Reply #27 on: Sunday 04 February 18 11:07 GMT (UK) »
No Death record for Richard Simpson either, he's a pain in the bum this bloke.
He's on the 1861 census then not on the 1871 census and Eleanor is down as a widow so I'm guessing he died between those years but yet again nowt on him ?
Turner Cowie Humphrey Ruffell Elsender Sample

Offline Girl Guide

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 6,437
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Simpson Marriage needed totally baffled
« Reply #28 on: Sunday 04 February 18 11:25 GMT (UK) »
Sure this isn't his death?

SIMPSON, RICHARD       53     
GRO Reference: 1862  J Quarter in BERWICK UPON TWEED  Volume 10B  Page 231

Do the maths and you get a birth year of 1809.
Ashford: Somerset, London
England: Devon, London, New Zealand
Holdway: Wiltshire
Hooper: Bristol, Somerset
Knowling: Devon, London
Southcott: Devon, China
Strong: Wiltshire
Watson: Cambridgeshire
White: Bristol
Windo - Gloucestershire, Somerset, Wiltshire

Offline DavyTee68

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 426
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Simpson Marriage needed totally baffled
« Reply #29 on: Sunday 04 February 18 14:42 GMT (UK) »
Sure this isn't his death?

SIMPSON, RICHARD       53     
GRO Reference: 1862  J Quarter in BERWICK UPON TWEED  Volume 10B  Page 231

Do the maths and you get a birth year of 1809.

Looks like it's him yeah don't know why I couldnt find that  :-\ think I'm gonna give up soon maybe come back to family history in a few years time
Turner Cowie Humphrey Ruffell Elsender Sample

Offline DavyTee68

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 426
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Simpson Marriage needed totally baffled
« Reply #30 on: Wednesday 07 February 18 15:09 GMT (UK) »
Marriages March qtr  1840   
 
EMBLETON    Eleanor         Tynemouth    20   392    

EDIT

Tree on FS shows she married Walter Blakey and died 1849
 

Just as an aside, the marriage could be cross-checked on the North Tyneside site, which confirms Walter Blakey. http://www.northtyneside.gov.uk/marriage-register.shtml

I can't find anything on SP either - thought they may have married there

It could have been an 'Irregular' cross-border marriage at Coldstream  :-\ http://www.rootschat.com/links/01lgs/ The problem with these is that they weren't all recorded.

Perhaps they didn't get married at all  :-\

Three cheers for Jen she was correct  :)
Richard Simpson did marry Eleanor Embleton on a cross border marriage at  Lamberton Toll 18th July 1841
And they were Presbyterian
Jen's always right you know  ;D
Turner Cowie Humphrey Ruffell Elsender Sample


Offline JenB

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 16,869
    • View Profile
Re: Simpson Marriage needed totally baffled
« Reply #31 on: Wednesday 07 February 18 15:18 GMT (UK) »
Richard Simpson did marry Eleanor Embleton on a cross border marriage at  Lamberton Toll 18th July 1841
And they were Presbyterian

That's a nice find. I'm pleased to be right about the cross-border marriage, though I got the location wrong  ::) How fortunate you are that it was recorded.

Jen's always right you know  ;D

Far from it  ;D
All Census Look Ups Are Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk