Author Topic: Tom O'Loughlin and Ann Marie Meelick Ireland 1940's  (Read 217 times)

Offline smileygirl

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 209
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Tom O'Loughlin and Ann Marie Meelick Ireland 1940's
« on: Thursday 15 February 18 20:06 GMT (UK) »
Hi can anyone restore this precious picture please?

RootsChat is the busiest, largest free family history forum site in the country. It is completely free to use. Register now.
Also register instantly with Facebook or Twitter (and other social networks). Start your genealogy search now.


Offline McGroger

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,044
  • Convicts, Commoners and Outlaws
    • View Profile
Re: Tom O'Loughlin and Ann Marie Meelick Ireland 1940's
« Reply #1 on: Friday 16 February 18 06:13 GMT (UK) »
My try.
Peter
Convicts: COSIER (1791); LEADBEATER (1791); SINGLETON (& PARKINSON) (1792); STROUD (1793); BARNES (aka SYDNEY) (1800); DAVIS (1804); CLARK (1806); TYLER (1810); COWEN (1818); ADAMS[ON] (1821); SMITH (1827); WHYBURN (1827); HARBORNE (1828).
Commoners: DOUGAN (1844); FORD (1849); JOHNSTON (1850); BEATTIE (& LONG) (1856); BRICKLEY (1883).
Outlaws: MCGREGOR (1883) & ass. clans, Glasgow, Glenquaich, Glenalmond and Glengyle.

RootsChat is the busiest, largest free family history forum site in the country. It is completely free to use. Register now.
Also register instantly with Facebook or Twitter (and other social networks). Start your genealogy search now.


Offline smileygirl

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 209
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Tom O'Loughlin and Ann Marie Meelick Ireland 1940's
« Reply #2 on: Friday 16 February 18 08:03 GMT (UK) »
Thanks so much Mcgroger that looks amazing!! All those horrible yellow bits and cracks flying saucer the lot all gone!!!  ;D

Offline loord74

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,110
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Tom O'Loughlin and Ann Marie Meelick Ireland 1940's
« Reply #3 on: Friday 16 February 18 10:06 GMT (UK) »
color one

Offline smileygirl

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 209
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Tom O'Loughlin and Ann Marie Meelick Ireland 1940's
« Reply #4 on: Friday 16 February 18 10:33 GMT (UK) »
Good job loord74  that is a huge difference to the original messy picture.  Thank you so much it is always nice to see it in colour. Amazing !  ;D

Offline loord74

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,110
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Tom O'Loughlin and Ann Marie Meelick Ireland 1940's
« Reply #5 on: Friday 16 February 18 11:55 GMT (UK) »
Good job loord74  that is a huge difference to the original messy picture.  Thank you so much it is always nice to see it in colour. Amazing !  ;D

You are welcome  ;D

Offline Trishanne

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,253
    • View Profile
Re: Tom O'Loughlin and Ann Marie Meelick Ireland 1940's
« Reply #6 on: Friday 16 February 18 13:30 GMT (UK) »
Hi there, this is not easy to restore as the features on the faces are blurred. Here is my try though.
Pat
Bownass - Lancashire & Westmorland
Hoggarth - Lancashire & Westmorland
Jackson- Lancaster
Waller - Dent, Yorkshire dales
Omerod - Lancashire
Redburn - Lancashire
Evans - Hereford

RESTORERS please do not use my restores without my permission THANK YOU

Offline smileygirl

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 209
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Tom O'Loughlin and Ann Marie Meelick Ireland 1940's
« Reply #7 on: Friday 16 February 18 13:56 GMT (UK) »
Thanks Trish Anne really good job. Yes this is a very hard one. I think whoever took the picture must have focused on the horse and not the people.  If I ever get a better copy of it I will let you know.  I think this is a photo of a photo which doesn't help either. It looks a 100 x better than the original picture thank you so much.