Author Topic: DNA Testing  (Read 1237 times)

Offline Eric Hatfield

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 174
  • Sydney, Australia
    • View Profile
Re: DNA Testing
« Reply #9 on: Friday 02 March 18 22:57 GMT (UK) »
Quote
DNA Testing might only lead to more confusion

But I think more often it leads to clarity. Besides adoptions with unknown parents, which can really only be solved through DNA except in exceptional circumstances, there are many cases (some say somewhere between 10% and 30% of births) where the named father (generally the husband of the mother) isn't in fact the biological father. I know of a case where it seems likely (not certain, as DNA hasn't led to an answer yet) that the named father was paid to accept paternity. Probably all of us with trees that go back more than 2 or 3 generations have false paternity "errors" in our trees but in many cases we don't know, and again, DNA or some written "confession" are the only ways to find out.

Surely this is an unnecessary argument. Both paper and DNA genealogy are important, both are necessary or very helpful in most trees. Being aware of the dangers and pitfalls of both is obviously important.

RootsChat is the busiest, largest free family history forum site in the country. It is completely free to use. Register now.
Also register instantly with Facebook or Twitter (and other social networks). Start your genealogy search now.


Offline Bobby G

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 74
    • View Profile
Re: DNA Testing
« Reply #10 on: Friday 02 March 18 23:10 GMT (UK) »
Excluding Ancestry, which has least helpful DNA tools, the others (geni, myhertiage, gedmatch, livingDNA (this year) are rapidly improving the helpfulness of the tools available to assist us with connecting to other.

For example, another update for Myheritage - https://blog.myheritage.com/2018/03/major-upgrade-to-the-myheritage-chromosome-browser-for-better-exploration-of-dna-matches/
Researching Gambrill www.gambrillfamilytree.com Gedmatch T909876 Join our Gambrill FB Group

RootsChat is the busiest, largest free family history forum site in the country. It is completely free to use. Register now.
Also register instantly with Facebook or Twitter (and other social networks). Start your genealogy search now.


Offline hurworth

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,099
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: DNA Testing
« Reply #11 on: Friday 02 March 18 23:22 GMT (UK) »
I've just been playing with the MyHeritage chromosome browser Bobby.  It's certainly an improvement on what they had, and I was thrilled when they added a chromosome browser a few weeks ago.  It almost makes up for a 2nd cousin whose DNA is incredibly useful who isn't keen on transferring from MyHeritage.

Hopefully in the future there will be a way to just select shared matches and put them straight in the chromosome browser.

I had been viewing each match on particular lines one by one and then uploading to spreadsheets.  This will involve far fewer downloads and cut and pastes.

Offline Eric Hatfield

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 174
  • Sydney, Australia
    • View Profile
Re: DNA Testing
« Reply #12 on: Friday 02 March 18 23:42 GMT (UK) »
Those interested in My Heritage may be interested in the rather exciting announcements in this post on DNA Explained - down towards the bottom.

Offline davidft

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,520
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: DNA Testing
« Reply #13 on: Saturday 03 March 18 11:30 GMT (UK) »
Those interested in My Heritage may be interested in the rather exciting announcements in this post on DNA Explained - down towards the bottom.

Thanks for posting the link. I had a read and particularly liked the DNApainter. I watched the YouTube presentation by one reviewer and it ties in with an article I once saw on the blog run by rootschatter "DevonCruwys"  https://cruwys.blogspot.co.uk/ where one person had constructed a similar painted effect the old fashioned way using spreadsheets etc. I see the cruwys blogspot also has an interview with Jonny Perl who developed the DNAPainter tool

(if I understood the youtube presentation I mentioned then DNAPainter is easier to use with results from companies like 23andme, ftDNA but more difficult to use with results from Ancestry (you have to request additional information from ancestry before you can use it)

I do not like the way these DNA Genealogy companies are creating speculative trees because although they are based on DNA results (OK) they are also including names dates and places culled from peoples trees and as we all know there are a lot of mistakes in some trees

Offline CarolA3

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,521
  • My adopted home
    • View Profile
Re: DNA Testing
« Reply #14 on: Saturday 03 March 18 13:15 GMT (UK) »
A similar fantastic(!) idea discussed here:
http://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php?topic=788974.0

Carol
OXFORDSHIRE / BERKSHIRE
Bullock, Cooper, Boler/Bowler, Wright, Robinson, Lee, Prior, Trinder, Newman, Walklin, Louch

Offline Bobby G

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 74
    • View Profile
Re: DNA Testing
« Reply #15 on: Saturday 03 March 18 22:28 GMT (UK) »
For those that would like to try DNApainter https://dnapainter.com/about

It greatly benefits your research... just keep adding those chromosome matches.

Researching Gambrill www.gambrillfamilytree.com Gedmatch T909876 Join our Gambrill FB Group

Offline BushInn1746

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,311
  • Selby 1815. Have You Seen Signature Anywhere Else?
    • View Profile
Re: DNA Testing
« Reply #16 on: Wednesday 24 October 18 21:47 BST (UK) »
DNA Testing? Oh Yes - Oh No!!

So far my Niece (my Sister's Daughter) has only managed to take our tree forward!

She contacted me and said she had a Spencer match, I was quaking with absolute excitement!

I had two Spencer Marriages in the same line to a Hood, in the early to mid 18th Century (which I just can't link back to), but also Spencer on my Mother's side in the 20th Century.

I'm afraid the DNA relative was a descendant from the 20th Century Spencer, but obviously very pleased to hear from her!

My excitement evaporated when I realised I knew her late Grandfather very well (he used to come and stay with his Sister, my late Gt Aunt and they came to our house for meals). But glad to see we both have the same trees (with Certs etc.) going back 200 years, on my Mother's side.

So that is my brush with DNA!

Mark
"George HOOD of Selby" Before 1812?

Born about 1785 (Yorkshire per 1841 Census)

Married Sarah RUSSELL at Selby 1815 newspaper - "both of that place".

Buried in the Quaker Burial Ground at Selby as "Not in Membership" in 1845, aged 60 years.

George HOOD of Selby was refused Membership of the Quakers in 1836.

Elected Overseer of the Poor of Selby in 1838.

Had both known (Selby) and unknown (some not stated 1846) property interests.

Possible (but unknown) links to COOK and/or PEARSON names.