Author Topic: 1943 Home Guard  (Read 1011 times)

Offline cupcake

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,302
  • My G Grandfather - Robert Johnstone Moffat
    • View Profile
1943 Home Guard
« on: Sunday 25 February 18 12:22 GMT (UK) »
Would it be possible for someone to improve this photograph - taken in Brighton 1943.

cupcake
Moffat- Mein - Titterington - Kidman

Offline loord74

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,400
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1943 Home Guard
« Reply #1 on: Sunday 25 February 18 21:15 GMT (UK) »
color one

Offline loord74

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,400
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1943 Home Guard
« Reply #2 on: Sunday 25 February 18 21:16 GMT (UK) »
b.w

Offline cupcake

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,302
  • My G Grandfather - Robert Johnstone Moffat
    • View Profile
Re: 1943 Home Guard
« Reply #3 on: Monday 26 February 18 07:12 GMT (UK) »
color one

Thank you for the colour and B&W photo's. I do like the coloured one.

cupcake
Moffat- Mein - Titterington - Kidman


Offline Wiggy

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 9,424
  • coloured by Gadget
    • View Profile
Re: 1943 Home Guard
« Reply #4 on: Monday 26 February 18 07:51 GMT (UK) »
I tried to straighten it but lost part of the soldier's head so  - the vase has to look on a slippery slope!   ;)  What a proud looking father!

Sorry but the focus wasn't good to start with.  :(   And once again, it looked much better on the computer than it does now when loaded onto this thread.   :(

Wiggy 
Gaunt, Ransom, McNally, Stanfield, Kimberley. (Tasmania)
Brown, Johnstone, Eskdale, Brand  (Dumfriesshire,  Scotland)
Booth, Bruerton, Deakin, Wilkes, Kimberley
(Warwicks, Staffords)
Gaunt (Yorks)
Percy, Dunning, Hyne, Grigg, Farley (Devon, UK)
Duncan (Fife, Devon), Hugh, Blee (Cornwall)
Green, Mansfield, (Herts)
Cavenaugh, Ransom (Middlesex)
 

 Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.

Offline Mike Morrell (NL)

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 502
  • Netherlands
    • View Profile
Re: 1943 Home Guard
« Reply #5 on: Monday 26 February 18 09:48 GMT (UK) »
One from me.
Mike
Photo restorers may re-use and improve on my posted versions. Acknowledgement appreciated.

Offline cupcake

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,302
  • My G Grandfather - Robert Johnstone Moffat
    • View Profile
Re: 1943 Home Guard
« Reply #6 on: Monday 26 February 18 13:06 GMT (UK) »
I tried to straighten it but lost part of the soldier's head so  - the vase has to look on a slippery slope!   ;)  What a proud looking father!

Sorry but the focus wasn't good to start with.  :(   And once again, it looked much better on the computer than it does now when loaded onto this thread.   :(

Wiggy

He looks a proud father with his first son.

Many thanks

cupcake
Moffat- Mein - Titterington - Kidman

Offline cupcake

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,302
  • My G Grandfather - Robert Johnstone Moffat
    • View Profile
Re: 1943 Home Guard
« Reply #7 on: Monday 26 February 18 13:09 GMT (UK) »
One from me.
Mike

Many thanks Mike. It can't be easy when the old photo's aren't good and sometimes out of focus.

Thank you all for your time.

Kind regards

cupcake
Moffat- Mein - Titterington - Kidman

Offline Mike Morrell (NL)

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 502
  • Netherlands
    • View Profile
Re: 1943 Home Guard
« Reply #8 on: Monday 26 February 18 16:37 GMT (UK) »
Forgive this rant, cupcake but IMHO this is actually a very good photo. It's well-composed and it captures the man's emotions perfectly. The man's face and expression are clearly recognisable. The baby's less so unfortunately, but this may well be due to his/her slight movement during the (long) exposure.

In this age of high-tech digital photography we tend to forget about how challenging the 'art of photography' was back then. Especially indoor photography with little light. This photo is well-balanced in terms of exposure.

These days, we're used to sharp photos. But older, 'softer' photos have a positive quality too. The main thing I really like about this photo is that it looks spontaneous and expressive (rather than static and posed as so many others are).

Old photos fade and get damaged and to a large extent, we can repair the damage and make old photos look less faded. But the original quality of the photo (composition, expressiveness) remains the same.

Mike
Quote
Many thanks Mike. It can't be easy when the old photo's aren't good and sometimes out of focus.
Kind regards

cupcake
Photo restorers may re-use and improve on my posted versions. Acknowledgement appreciated.