Author Topic: Why were ages on 1800s census's so loosely accurate?  (Read 1425 times)

Offline chirp

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 404
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.natio
    • View Profile
Re: Why were ages on 1800s census's so loosely accurate?
« Reply #36 on: Tuesday 06 March 18 17:15 GMT (UK) »
Thank you Sloe Gin. I too have a couple of these short certificates and they were issued some years after the child's birth so I wondered if they had been obtained when the individual was starting work.
AVERY, Berks, BLUNDELL, North Meols, BOND, Wilts,  BRUNDRETT, Lancs, CHORLTON, Salford, DUNKLEY, West Haddon, FOGGIN, Yorks, GRANT, Durham,  GRESTY, Salford, GRINDROD, Salford, HUMM, Bethnal Green, MALONEY, Limerick & Lancs,  MARCHANT, Worcs, McPHERSON, Kent, MELLISH, Finsbury, PERRETT, Wilts,  RAGG, Yorks, RAINSFORD, Staffs, RENSHAW, Salford, ROSS, Leicester, TIGHE/TYE, All, WELLER, Berks, WILKINSON, Wes
Early 19th C Hairdressing & Perfumery
Spittalfields Silkweavers
Glass making, S Shields

RootsChat is the busiest, largest free family history forum site in the country. It is completely free to use. Register now.
Also register instantly with Facebook or Twitter (and other social networks). Start your genealogy search now.