Author Topic: bridget stafford duncormick  (Read 644 times)

Offline BLSstory

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 22
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: bridget stafford duncormick
« Reply #18 on: Wednesday 14 March 18 06:28 GMT (UK) »
Yes, that is my mistake.  My post should have read "There is no Anne in the parish registers".

What do you make of all this?  I would love for this to work but I'm just not sure.

Thank you for any guidance you can give me.

:-)

RootsChat is the busiest, largest free family history forum site in the country. It is completely free to use. Register now.
Also register instantly with Facebook or Twitter (and other social networks). Start your genealogy search now.


Online hallmark

  • -
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,336
    • View Profile
Re: bridget stafford duncormick
« Reply #19 on: Wednesday 14 March 18 07:26 GMT (UK) »
Well someone found that Mary Anne  was formerly a Hawkins before marrying Patrick Donohoe (no 'O') and they were the parents of Patrick O'Donohoe mentioned above and in the 1911 census.....

Where it was found wasn't mentioned.....

RootsChat is the busiest, largest free family history forum site in the country. It is completely free to use. Register now.
Also register instantly with Facebook or Twitter (and other social networks). Start your genealogy search now.


Offline BLSstory

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 22
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: bridget stafford duncormick
« Reply #20 on: Wednesday 14 March 18 11:51 GMT (UK) »
Ok, I'm going to go with that.  You're the expert !!

I'm going to claim that the Mary that was born in 1839 is the same as the Anne in the 1901 census.  And they are both the same as the Mary Anne in the 1911 census.

If you agree with that, then that's what I'll record.

Thanks for all your help.

:-)