Author Topic: lost relations  (Read 594 times)

Offline pearlds001

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 10
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
lost relations
« on: Monday 16 April 18 11:47 BST (UK) »
Claydon estates Taplow 1812 .. Montague family from 1777  ti=o  1899.. when Cookham transferred to maidenhead

RootsChat is the busiest, largest free family history forum site in the country. It is completely free to use. Register now.
Also register instantly with Facebook or Twitter (and other social networks). Start your genealogy search now.


Online rosie99

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 27,244
    • View Profile
Re: lost relations
« Reply #1 on: Monday 16 April 18 11:55 BST (UK) »
Hi

We will need to have a bit more information to be able to help you, what is it you are trying to find out
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

RootsChat is the busiest, largest free family history forum site in the country. It is completely free to use. Register now.
Also register instantly with Facebook or Twitter (and other social networks). Start your genealogy search now.


Offline pearlds001

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 10
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: lost relations
« Reply #2 on: Monday 16 April 18 12:03 BST (UK) »
I have two sets of Names
1 William  & Phoebe Montague   Claydon Estate  Taplow  Bucks
2 William & Phebe  ( Note The spelling of Phoebe  ??)   all children Christened in Wooburn Bucks
Trying to find out if the family's are the same or Different
The spelling of Phoebe is different
So Confusing
Fred evans

Online rosie99

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 27,244
    • View Profile
Re: lost relations
« Reply #3 on: Monday 16 April 18 12:08 BST (UK) »
Phoebe/Phebe would sound the same to a clergyman who was writing it down, I doubt that she would have spelt it out for him  :)   They are often interchanged.
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline pearlds001

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 10
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: lost relations
« Reply #4 on: Monday 16 April 18 12:30 BST (UK) »
Thank you yes that is acceptable
My Problem is .. I have  A  William and Phoebe  from Claydon Estates Taplow  dating from 1777/ 1812
Then some born Taplow ,, Springfield estate ???
Then William and Phoebe 1842  from wooburn Bucks why should some be christned in taplow and some in Wooburn ,,  the dates dont add up

Offline MaureeninNY

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,388
    • View Profile
Re: lost relations
« Reply #5 on: Monday 16 April 18 13:23 BST (UK) »
The William and Ph*be (Montaque on Ancestry) who are on the 1841 census must be this couple:

William Montague
Marriage Date:   8 Jan 1827
Marriage Place:   Wooburn, Buckingham, England
Spouse:   Phebe Lacey
......
I'm not certain of her age on the 1841 census. It looks more like 35 than 25 to me. (and rounding up and down,etc.)

Just to check against the 1851 census:
GRO Births:
MONTAGUE, CHARLOTTE  AUGUSTA     mmn LACEY     
 1849  M Quarter in ETON BUCKS  Volume 06  Page 409

MONTAGUE, SAMUEL       mmn LACEY 
1844  D Quarter in ETON UNION, BUCKS  Volume 06  Page 349

Maureen





Online rosie99

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 27,244
    • View Profile
Re: lost relations
« Reply #6 on: Monday 16 April 18 13:28 BST (UK) »
I was just going to add 1841 Taplow has
Clayden Estate
William 30 Bn in county
Phoebe 35 Not born in County
Caroline 14
Rachel 12
Ann 7
Betsey 5
Mary 3
Harriett 4 months

Caroline, Rachel, Ann & Elizabeth (Betsey) all baptised Wooburn - abode on baptisms is Wooburn.  By 1841 they are living in Taplow
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline MaureeninNY

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,388
    • View Profile
Re: lost relations
« Reply #7 on: Monday 16 April 18 14:39 BST (UK) »
Thanks,Rosie!

Still not quite sure what we were/are looking for but it beats staring out the window at all the rain coming down here.

Maureen :)

Online rosie99

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 27,244
    • View Profile
Re: lost relations
« Reply #8 on: Monday 16 April 18 16:01 BST (UK) »
I am confused with the first post and the 1700's dates and 1812.  Not sure what is meant by Cookham transferring to Maidenhead either.  Can you please give a bit more information on the earlier Montagues.

Maureen, Sorry to hear you have rain,  we are promised sunshine this week after what seems like weeks of rain on/off.  I should be in the garden  ;D
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk