Hi Ian,
Goodness he seems to have sent the article all over the place! I know he sent a version to a maritme newspaper in Gothenburg, with his name attached to it. But I have not been able to get a copy of it. That is why I guessed that he would be 'Sinbad' writing the Californian article.
So the link you just gave, written in Finnish(?) translated itself through google. But google translate isn't very good, so I really couldn't work out what was being written. But I got the feeling he was not recommending migrating to Australia? That the work for men was difficult and limited? He ws suggesting America instead? But for female servants prospects were good if they were prepared to work hard?
The second paragraph is the most puzzling? I do not understand what he was saying in comparison to America referring to George Washington.
He doesn't sound like a very nice person, from what I can make out in the article?
He signed the petition to federate Australia a decade after this was published and was naturalised in 1904. And he never left Australia. So he must have liked it a little.
I know a reasonable bit about his history, but his father, who was quite well known, dis-owned him and that is a mystery. But we believe that is why he migrated to Australia. He only arrived in Australia to live, in 1885, so his claim of living here 10 years is not true!
I wonder if he wrote other articles. I have 18 pages of lecture notes that he wrote in Swedish. But I think they must be a history of Sweden as it has a few dates and names of kings.
So I hope finding the Finnish article saved you from translating the page? I hope you hadn't already spent a lot of time on it! But could you just tell me what he is trying to say in the second paragrah?
Thanks Ian for sending the link.
Best wishes,
Libby