Author Topic: Adam Jackson 1893  (Read 2899 times)

Offline keyboard86

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 17,056
    • View Profile
Re: Adam Jackson 1893
« Reply #27 on: Sunday 13 May 18 17:33 BST (UK) »
Hi again, 1892 or 1893 Preston?
Keyboard86

PS As I said, possible childrens births do not appear to contain any of his own family members if correct Adam?!
Pelly/Pelley/Kingsbury/Challis/Nalder/Rochester/Raydenbow

UK Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline sadge

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 81
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Adam Jackson 1893
« Reply #28 on: Sunday 13 May 18 19:04 BST (UK) »
Lancashire BMD says 1893 but school records say 1892, his stepfather Henry Bamford put him down as 25.3.92 and then on another school record it says 24.7.92, so I will say now 92. Confusing

Susan

Offline keyboard86

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 17,056
    • View Profile
Re: Adam Jackson 1893
« Reply #29 on: Sunday 13 May 18 19:26 BST (UK) »
Lancashire BMD says 1893 but school records say 1892, his stepfather Henry Bamford put him down as 25.3.92 and then on another school record it says 24.7.92, so I will say now 92. Confusing

Susan

Hi again, you may need that marriage 1919 to confirm whether it is him or not, the possible childrens births do not bode well with me, but you never know?
Have you ordered the 1893 birth?
Keyboard86
Pelly/Pelley/Kingsbury/Challis/Nalder/Rochester/Raydenbow

UK Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline sadge

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 81
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Adam Jackson 1893
« Reply #30 on: Sunday 13 May 18 19:36 BST (UK) »
Not yet but will this coming week, and then maybe the marriage certificate. When I have the birth certificate I will post on here confirming dates. I see on the death record for Adam V Jackson it does give his birth on there as 1893 not 1896 as on the 1939 record so I am a little hopeful :)