Author Topic: Francis Samuel & Mary Ann Stevens - can they be enhanced?  (Read 982 times)

Offline McGroger

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,724
  • Convicts, Commoners and Outlaws
    • View Profile
Re: Francis Samuel & Mary Ann Stevens - can they be enhanced?
« Reply #9 on: Monday 14 May 18 02:37 BST (UK) »
Bit different take on japeflakes's idea.
Peter
Convicts: COSIER (1791); LEADBEATER (1791); SINGLETON (& PARKINSON) (1792); STROUD (1793); BARNES (aka SYDNEY) (1800); DAVIS (1804); CLARK (1806); TYLER (1810); COWEN (1818); ADAMS[ON] (1821); SMITH (1827); WHYBURN (1827); HARBORNE (1828).
Commoners: DOUGAN (1844); FORD (1849); JOHNSTON (1850); BEATTIE (& LONG) (1856); BRICKLEY (1883).
Outlaws: MCGREGOR (1883) & ass. clans, Glasgow, Glenquaich, Glenalmond and Glengyle.

Offline Avondale16

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 880
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Francis Samuel & Mary Ann Stevens - can they be enhanced?
« Reply #10 on: Monday 14 May 18 11:45 BST (UK) »
Bit different take on japeflakes's idea.
Peter

Very creative Peter - great use of the flag - I now have a lovely collection of this super photo.
Thanks for your time & work on this one
Keith

Offline McGroger

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,724
  • Convicts, Commoners and Outlaws
    • View Profile
Re: Francis Samuel & Mary Ann Stevens - can they be enhanced?
« Reply #11 on: Monday 14 May 18 13:40 BST (UK) »
Always a pleasure, Keith.
Peter
Convicts: COSIER (1791); LEADBEATER (1791); SINGLETON (& PARKINSON) (1792); STROUD (1793); BARNES (aka SYDNEY) (1800); DAVIS (1804); CLARK (1806); TYLER (1810); COWEN (1818); ADAMS[ON] (1821); SMITH (1827); WHYBURN (1827); HARBORNE (1828).
Commoners: DOUGAN (1844); FORD (1849); JOHNSTON (1850); BEATTIE (& LONG) (1856); BRICKLEY (1883).
Outlaws: MCGREGOR (1883) & ass. clans, Glasgow, Glenquaich, Glenalmond and Glengyle.