Author Topic: Query re relationship  (Read 789 times)

Offline Betty S

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 160
    • View Profile
Query re relationship
« on: Wednesday 16 May 18 07:50 BST (UK) »
I am trying to work out a relationship in my Family tree......according to ancestry the person I am looking at is" the wife of the husband of the sister in law of the uncle of the wife of the uncle"

It  keeps going round and round in my head and cannot make sense of it........is there some kind, clever,  person out there who can help????????
Betty S
Rodger/Stewart: Ayr, Renfrew,Lanark: Stewart/Blair:Argyll,Ayr:
Macleod/Fraser/Matheson/Mcgregor:Sutherland
Breheny/Murphy:Tasmania, Ire
McLeods to Aus

Offline mckha489

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 9,547
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Query re relationship
« Reply #1 on: Wednesday 16 May 18 08:17 BST (UK) »
is "Uncle" meant to be the same person?  Because if so it makes no sense.
Lets call them
wife = Jane
Husband = John
Sister in law = Betty
Brother = Peter
Uncle (brother of Peter) = Frank

Step 1.
Wife of the Husband of the Sister in Law =   Husband here had 2 wives 1 named wife and 1 named Sister -in law
so Jane married John who was previously or later married to Betty

Step 2.
Sister in law was married to Brother of Uncle
so Betty was married either before or after to Peter

Step 3
Frank,  Peter's brother , was the uncle of his own wife!

Well thats how I see it. Personally I would just say no relation!

Offline Betty S

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 160
    • View Profile
Re: Query re relationship
« Reply #2 on: Wednesday 16 May 18 08:30 BST (UK) »
Thanks for your quick reply.......I agree....on the Ancestry FT, it will say " no direct relationship"  and I just happened to notice this other message and I wanted to see if we were connected to this family.

But thanks for your help. I think I will just claim there MIGHT be a connection, but not an actual relationship......
Regards
Betty S
Rodger/Stewart: Ayr, Renfrew,Lanark: Stewart/Blair:Argyll,Ayr:
Macleod/Fraser/Matheson/Mcgregor:Sutherland
Breheny/Murphy:Tasmania, Ire
McLeods to Aus

Offline majm

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 25,385
  • NSW 1806 Bowman Flag Ecce signum.
    • View Profile
Re: Query re relationship
« Reply #3 on: Wednesday 16 May 18 08:31 BST (UK) »
.... according to ancestry the person I am looking at is" the wife of the husband of the sister in law of the uncle of the wife of the uncle" ....


I think there's seven people there....

So I think the person you are looking at is a female (the wife of) and she is a married person (wife ) so there's TWO people there ...

THEN reading the sentence from the end to the beginning.

.. so two more people ... wife of the uncle
... two more people  .... sister in law of the uncle of the wife of the uncle
... one more  person ... husband of the sister in law of the uncle of the wife of the uncle 
Seven people  :)

I cannot see that the person you are looking at is related to you.

JM
The information in my posts is provided for academic and non-commercial research purposes. 
Random Acts of Kindness Given Freely are never Worthless for they are Priceless.
Qui scit et non docet.    Qui docet et non vivit.    Qui nescit et non interrogat.   
All Census Look Ups Are Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
I do not have a face book or a twitter account.


Offline majm

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 25,385
  • NSW 1806 Bowman Flag Ecce signum.
    • View Profile
Re: Query re relationship
« Reply #4 on: Wednesday 16 May 18 08:33 BST (UK) »
a husband's sister in law can be his wife's sister, or the his own brother's wife.

an ex-sister in law would suggest a divorce.

 ;D

ADD, it is the husband of the sister in law of the uncle ....  :)

JM
The information in my posts is provided for academic and non-commercial research purposes. 
Random Acts of Kindness Given Freely are never Worthless for they are Priceless.
Qui scit et non docet.    Qui docet et non vivit.    Qui nescit et non interrogat.   
All Census Look Ups Are Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
I do not have a face book or a twitter account.

Offline Betty S

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 160
    • View Profile
Re: Query re relationship
« Reply #5 on: Wednesday 16 May 18 09:27 BST (UK) »
Thanks for your replies, majm......is it a funny way of saying that there might be a connection? anyway it can't be a close connection!
Every time I look at the sentence I groan!!!!
So thanks again for your humorous remarks!!!!
Betty S
Rodger/Stewart: Ayr, Renfrew,Lanark: Stewart/Blair:Argyll,Ayr:
Macleod/Fraser/Matheson/Mcgregor:Sutherland
Breheny/Murphy:Tasmania, Ire
McLeods to Aus

Offline majm

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 25,385
  • NSW 1806 Bowman Flag Ecce signum.
    • View Profile
Re: Query re relationship
« Reply #6 on: Wednesday 16 May 18 09:45 BST (UK) »
 :)  glad you understood my musings :)  Ancestry can have some non-explainable ways of describing non-existing relationships.   ::)

JM
The information in my posts is provided for academic and non-commercial research purposes. 
Random Acts of Kindness Given Freely are never Worthless for they are Priceless.
Qui scit et non docet.    Qui docet et non vivit.    Qui nescit et non interrogat.   
All Census Look Ups Are Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
I do not have a face book or a twitter account.