Author Topic: Wood Family Group - can this be improved?  (Read 603 times)

Offline Avondale16

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 787
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Wood Family Group - can this be improved?
« Reply #18 on: Friday 06 July 18 17:50 BST (UK) »
Thank you Keith. Do you think Arthur was expecting Mrs Woods to clean his shoes and she said if you don't clean your own shoes, they wont get cleaned.  ;D ;D ;D

 ;D ;D if he did it looks like Mrs Woods has thrown them in the dustbin!

RootsChat is the busiest, largest free family history forum site in the country. It is completely free to use. Register now.
Also register instantly with Facebook or Twitter (and other social networks). Start your genealogy search now.


Offline Treetotal

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 21,958
  • Great Grandma Capes
    • View Profile
Re: Wood Family Group - can this be improved?
« Reply #19 on: Friday 06 July 18 18:05 BST (UK) »
Maybe he refused to wear his good shoes in the garden on the premise that, nobody would notice, besides which, they are comfy  :D
Carol
CAPES Hull. KIRK  Leeds, Hull. JONES  Wales,  Lancashire. CARROLL Ireland, Lancashire, U.S.A. BROUGHTON Leicester, Goole, Hull BORRILL  Lincolnshire, Durham, Hull. GROOM  Wishbech, Hull. ANTHONY St. John's Nfld. BUCKNALL Lincolnshire, Hull. BUTT Harbour Grace, Newfoundland. PARSONS  Western Bay, Newfoundland. MONAGHAN  Ireland, U.S.A. PERRY Cheshire, Liverpool.
 
RESTORERS:PLEASE DO NOT USE MY RESTORES WITHOUT PRIOR PERMISSION - THANK YOU

RootsChat is the busiest, largest free family history forum site in the country. It is completely free to use. Register now.
Also register instantly with Facebook or Twitter (and other social networks). Start your genealogy search now.


Offline Avondale16

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 787
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Wood Family Group - can this be improved?
« Reply #20 on: Friday 06 July 18 18:19 BST (UK) »
Maybe he refused to wear his good shoes in the garden on the premise that, nobody would notice, besides which, they are comfy  :D
Carol

Arthur was a postman by trade so no doubt his feet had taken a pounding over the years so you may well be right that he needed a comfy pair of shoes - unfortunately they stick out like a sore thumb  :)