Author Topic: John Alcock, father of Thomas b 1850 Hanley  (Read 2023 times)

Online rosie99

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 42,053
  • ALFIE 2009 - 2021 (Rosbercon Sky's the Limit)
    • View Profile
Re: John Alcock, father of Thomas b 1850 Hanley
« Reply #9 on: Tuesday 10 July 18 14:12 BST (UK) »
Possible for Thomas:

Baptism at St Giles, Cheadle (Roman Catholic)

Thomas, son of Johannis and Maria Teresa Douglas - born 15 March 1849, baptised 18 March 1849.

This couple are in Cheadle in 1851 that John was also a Carrier
HO107 /2009 f460 p26
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline ChrissieL

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 878
  • Ben and John Hardman meeting up in Cairo
    • View Profile
Re: John Alcock, father of Thomas b 1850 Hanley
« Reply #10 on: Tuesday 10 July 18 21:37 BST (UK) »
Might be a long shot but....
On the 1851 census for Wolviston, Durham
HO107; Piece: 2384; Folio: 68; Page: 37
there is a Thomas Alcock aged 8 months, grandson born in Staffordshire
at the home of William Bone aged 46
There is a daughter called Jemima Bone aged 21.  I noticed one of Thomas Alcock's children is called Jemima

Chris
Staffordshire: Lawton Probyn Horrobin
Durham: Bamlett Hardman Winship Robinson
Suffolk: Leggett

Offline pergamond

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 271
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: John Alcock, father of Thomas b 1850 Hanley
« Reply #11 on: Tuesday 10 July 18 21:49 BST (UK) »
I don't think this is a long shot. I have seen an Alcock family tree online which includes a Jemima Bone... thank you so much. I'll need to investigate this further.

Offline ChrissieL

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 878
  • Ben and John Hardman meeting up in Cairo
    • View Profile
Re: John Alcock, father of Thomas b 1850 Hanley
« Reply #12 on: Tuesday 10 July 18 21:57 BST (UK) »
I noticed that although Jemima has the surname 'Bone' on the 1851 census entry, she did in fact marry a John Alcock in 1949  1849 in Stockton on Tees

Chris
Staffordshire: Lawton Probyn Horrobin
Durham: Bamlett Hardman Winship Robinson
Suffolk: Leggett


Offline ChrissieL

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 878
  • Ben and John Hardman meeting up in Cairo
    • View Profile
Re: John Alcock, father of Thomas b 1850 Hanley
« Reply #13 on: Tuesday 10 July 18 21:59 BST (UK) »
It looks like Jemima may have died in 1858 

Staffordshire: Lawton Probyn Horrobin
Durham: Bamlett Hardman Winship Robinson
Suffolk: Leggett

Offline pergamond

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 271
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: John Alcock, father of Thomas b 1850 Hanley
« Reply #14 on: Tuesday 10 July 18 22:51 BST (UK) »
I've found a John Alcock with wife Jemima and family in 1881, but John was a shipwright, and Jemima was born about 1836 in Sunderland, Durham. In the 1851 census Jemima was born about 1830 in Wolviston, Durham.

Offline pergamond

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 271
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: John Alcock, father of Thomas b 1850 Hanley
« Reply #15 on: Tuesday 10 July 18 23:09 BST (UK) »
I've looked for deaths for John Alcock prior to 1874, but none of the ones I found were tailors.

Offline pergamond

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 271
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: John Alcock, father of Thomas b 1850 Hanley
« Reply #16 on: Wednesday 11 July 18 01:20 BST (UK) »
If I ordered the 1849 marriage for John Alcock and Jemima Bone, is it likely to give the occupations?

Online BumbleB

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,301
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: John Alcock, father of Thomas b 1850 Hanley
« Reply #17 on: Wednesday 11 July 18 06:41 BST (UK) »
Yes, it should give you John's occupation, plus probably the occupations of the two fathers.
Transcriptions and NBI are merely finding aids.  They are NOT a substitute for original record entries.
Remember - "They'll be found when they want to be found" !!!
If you don't ask the question, you won't get an answer.
He/she who never made a mistake, never made anything.
Archbell - anywhere, any date
Kendall - WRY
Milner - WRY
Appleyard - WRY