Author Topic: Baker family Kilkenny ?  (Read 3055 times)

Offline hallmark

  • ~
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,525
    • View Profile
Re: Baker family Kilkenny ?
« Reply #18 on: Saturday 04 August 18 20:44 BST (UK) »
https://registers.nli.ie/registers/vtls000633504#page/27/mode/1up  gets 1892...then you can look though for whatever Month they married...
Give a man a record and you feed him for a day.
Teach a man to research, and you feed him for a lifetime.

Offline hallmark

  • ~
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,525
    • View Profile
Re: Baker family Kilkenny ?
« Reply #19 on: Saturday 04 August 18 20:46 BST (UK) »
Give a man a record and you feed him for a day.
Teach a man to research, and you feed him for a lifetime.

Offline heywood

  • RootsChat Honorary
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 40,860
    • View Profile
Re: Baker family Kilkenny ?
« Reply #20 on: Saturday 04 August 18 20:53 BST (UK) »
He is 51 in 1911  :-\
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline David0088

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 46
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Baker family Kilkenny ?
« Reply #21 on: Saturday 04 August 18 20:58 BST (UK) »


Offline hallmark

  • ~
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,525
    • View Profile
Re: Baker family Kilkenny ?
« Reply #22 on: Saturday 04 August 18 21:04 BST (UK) »
He is 51 in 1911  :-\

It just says of Full Age on Marriage Cert!  Grrrr   ;D
Give a man a record and you feed him for a day.
Teach a man to research, and you feed him for a lifetime.

Offline David0088

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 46
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Baker family Kilkenny ?
« Reply #23 on: Saturday 04 August 18 21:10 BST (UK) »
He is 51 in 1911  :-\

James is down as being 35 in 1901 10 years on he is 51 and is down as only being 5 years married in 1911, strange.

I know ages back then were not accurate but not to this extent, maybe some just lied about their ages lol.

Offline hallmark

  • ~
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,525
    • View Profile
Re: Baker family Kilkenny ?
« Reply #24 on: Saturday 04 August 18 21:13 BST (UK) »
He is 51 in 1911  :-\

James is down as being 35 in 1901 10 years on he is 51 and is down as only being 5 years married in 1911, strange.

I know ages back then were not accurate but not to this extent, maybe some just lied about their ages lol.


As Heywood said....  Seems to have a new wife in 1911
Give a man a record and you feed him for a day.
Teach a man to research, and you feed him for a lifetime.

Offline hallmark

  • ~
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,525
    • View Profile
Re: Baker family Kilkenny ?
« Reply #25 on: Saturday 04 August 18 21:16 BST (UK) »
Mary, born King's Co 1901

Mary born Co Monaghan in 1911
Give a man a record and you feed him for a day.
Teach a man to research, and you feed him for a lifetime.

Offline hallmark

  • ~
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,525
    • View Profile
Re: Baker family Kilkenny ?
« Reply #26 on: Saturday 04 August 18 21:20 BST (UK) »
2nd wife was Mary Cooper
Give a man a record and you feed him for a day.
Teach a man to research, and you feed him for a lifetime.