Mary Thompson/William Richardson

[heywood]

1861 2893/10/13
127 York Street Hulme

John Thompson   37 yrs Pattern Maker b West Ward Cumberland
Eliza Thompson   37 yrs b Manchester
Mary Thompson   4 yrs b Manchester
Hannah Thompson 1 yr b Manchester

[lancsann]

did your great grandmother become Mary Sutton and were her siblings Hugh, William, Alice, Hannah & James?

[heywood]

did your great grandmother become Mary Sutton and were her siblings Hugh, William, Alice, Hannah & James?

Ah now, I have siblings to Mary Richardson in 1891 - John W; James and Annie 

[lancsann]

did your great grandmother become Mary Sutton and were her siblings Hugh, William, Alice, Hannah & James?

Ah now, I have siblings to Mary Richardson in 1891 - John W; James and Annie 

I was querying because there is this other family that fit mmn Gannon for all those I listed (5 siblings to Mary as stated by OP) including a Mary Ann registered June qtr 1887. I wondered if that Thomspson birth certificate was the wrong one

William Richardson married Mary Ann Gannon in Pemberton in 1883

[heywood]

I was assuming Manchester because of the ‘marriage’ details given.

[lancsann]

Freebmd has a marriage June quarter 1880 in Chorley, Mary Thompson with a William Richardson on the same page, Williams entry is in italics which has some significance but I don’t know what

Mike

It is in italics because it is mistranscribed. It should be Fylde 8e 803

[lancsann]

I was just trying to think 'outside the box' really. Assumptions are often made and a wrong certificate sent for. The poster has not given any census details to prove the area born or details of the 5 siblings

[heywood]

Good point.
At the moment though, I don’t think  there is a likely marriage, is there?

[heywood]

I was just trying to think 'outside the box' really. Assumptions are often made and a wrong certificate sent for. The poster has not given any census details to prove the area born or details of the 5 siblings

Mmm. Not sure I can find the birth now that I found to check the quarter so I could be completely wrong there.
Apologies if all this is wrong!

Added
Found it - I was confusing Richardson and Thompson