Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Uncle Jack must have been overexposed - can he be improved?  (Read 431 times)

Offline alistquin

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 762
  • Never say Never!
    • View Profile
Uncle Jack must have been overexposed - can he be improved?
« on: Sunday 12 August 18 11:48 BST (UK) »
I discovered a batch of old negatives and had some of them printed, but my late uncle and Godfather, Jack Winton has almost lost his bottom half. Is it possible to make this photo look more respectable?

Alistair
Quinlan - Glasgow & Ireland + married Hogbin, Best & King, Australia
Winton - Angus
Joyce - Westport, County Mayo, Ireland
Aitkin/Aitken - Roxburghshire, Selkirkshire, Co. Galway, Australia
Taylor - County Tyrone, Skibereen, Loughrea, Liverpool, Beccles
Higgins, Ryan and Kelly - Athenry
White - Clara, Kings County/County Offally
Law - Ayrshire, Argyllshire
Orr - Ayrshire, County Antrim, Australia
Burnett - Kincardineshire, Angus, Clydebank
Carnegie - Kincardineshire

Offline Trishanne

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,247
    • View Profile
Re: Uncle Jack must have been overexposed - can he be improved?
« Reply #1 on: Sunday 12 August 18 19:26 BST (UK) »
I couldn't save the bottom part of the photo unfortunately
Pat
Bownass - Lancashire & Westmorland
Hoggarth - Lancashire & Westmorland
Jackson- Lancaster
Waller - Dent, Yorkshire dales
Omerod - Lancashire
Redburn - Lancashire
Evans - Hereford

RESTORERS please do not use my restores without my permission THANK YOU

Offline japeflakes

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,304
    • View Profile
Re: Uncle Jack must have been overexposed - can he be improved?
« Reply #2 on: Sunday 12 August 18 21:22 BST (UK) »
..

Offline McGroger

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,728
  • Convicts, Commoners and Outlaws
    • View Profile
Re: Uncle Jack must have been overexposed - can he be improved?
« Reply #3 on: Monday 13 August 18 08:51 BST (UK) »
My try.
Peter
Convicts: COSIER (1791); LEADBEATER (1791); SINGLETON (& PARKINSON) (1792); STROUD (1793); BARNES (aka SYDNEY) (1800); DAVIS (1804); CLARK (1806); TYLER (1810); COWEN (1818); ADAMS[ON] (1821); SMITH (1827); WHYBURN (1827); HARBORNE (1828).
Commoners: DOUGAN (1844); FORD (1849); JOHNSTON (1850); BEATTIE (& LONG) (1856); BRICKLEY (1883).
Outlaws: MCGREGOR (1883) & ass. clans, Glasgow, Glenquaich, Glenalmond and Glengyle.

Offline alistquin

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 762
  • Never say Never!
    • View Profile
Re: Uncle Jack must have been overexposed - can he be improved?
« Reply #4 on: Monday 13 August 18 11:31 BST (UK) »
A big 'thank you' to Pat, japeflakes and Peter. A great improvement!  ;D ;D ;D

Alistair
Quinlan - Glasgow & Ireland + married Hogbin, Best & King, Australia
Winton - Angus
Joyce - Westport, County Mayo, Ireland
Aitkin/Aitken - Roxburghshire, Selkirkshire, Co. Galway, Australia
Taylor - County Tyrone, Skibereen, Loughrea, Liverpool, Beccles
Higgins, Ryan and Kelly - Athenry
White - Clara, Kings County/County Offally
Law - Ayrshire, Argyllshire
Orr - Ayrshire, County Antrim, Australia
Burnett - Kincardineshire, Angus, Clydebank
Carnegie - Kincardineshire
Pages: [1]