Author Topic: Illegitimacy and adoption around 1909  (Read 2069 times)

Offline LDaw

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 97
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Illegitimacy and adoption around 1909
« on: Friday 17 August 18 17:57 BST (UK) »
I've realised that I was assuming it was standard practice for illegitimate babies to be adopted but now I'm wondering if that was more of a 1950s/1960s "solution".

Does anyone know what was usual around 1909 for a family to do when the unmarried daughter had a baby?  The grandfather was a general labourer and the mother was a live in domestic servant in 1911.  (In this case the child stayed with the grandparents and the younger sister had an involvement in raising during the early years.  Was this usual?

Thanks

Offline lizdb

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 25,307
    • View Profile
Re: Illegitimacy and adoption around 1909
« Reply #1 on: Friday 17 August 18 18:03 BST (UK) »
Often happened. I have cases in my tree where illegitimate offspring were brought up by grandparents or other relations.

As for "usual", not sure there was a usual way!  Different families would react in different ways.
Edmonds/Edmunds - mainly Sussex
DeBoo - London
Green - Suffolk
Parker - Sussex
Kemp - Essex
Farrington - Essex
Boniface - West Sussex

census information is Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Online Gan Yam

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 583
  • Going Home - exploring my past
    • View Profile
Re: Illegitimacy and adoption around 1909
« Reply #2 on: Friday 17 August 18 18:13 BST (UK) »
My grandmother and her sister both had illegitimate children around 1910. Both children were brought up by their mothers even after their mothers married and not to the fathers
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Online Jebber

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,381
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Illegitimacy and adoption around 1909
« Reply #3 on: Friday 17 August 18 18:42 BST (UK) »
The adoption act did not come in until 1926: effective in 1927, before that it was an informal arrangement, sometimes through the Church when a childless couple were known to be receptive to bringing up a stranger's child.

It was quite common for grandparents to bring them up, sometimes the child grew up believing their mother was a their older sister. As has already been said, sometimes they were taken in by other family members.
CHOULES All ,  COKER Harwich Essex & Rochester Kent 
COLE Gt. Oakley, & Lt. Oakley, Essex.
DUNCAN Kent
EVERITT Colchester,  Dovercourt & Harwich Essex
GULLIVER/GULLOFER Fifehead Magdalen Dorset
HORSCROFT Kent.
KING Sturminster Newton, Dorset. MONK Odiham Ham.
SCOTT Wrabness, Essex
WILKINS Stour Provost, Dorset.
WICKHAM All in North Essex.
WICKHAM Medway Towns, Kent from 1880
WICKHAM, Ipswich, Suffolk.


Offline Creasegirl

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 216
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Illegitimacy and adoption around 1909
« Reply #4 on: Friday 17 August 18 19:26 BST (UK) »
My great grandmother had my grandfather in 1910 in the home if a woman which i think was an informal midwife/ maternity hospital for illegitimate births.  My grandfather was then adopted at a few months old to a childless couple.  This was in edinburgh  and my great grandmother was in domestic service. 
Ferguson (st fillans, comrie)
Garnock (lothian, fife)
Valet (london, switzerland)
Butcher (ramsgate, glasgow)
Blackbird (durham,  newcastle)
Barr (ayrshire, ireland)
Fleming (paisley)
Crone, croney ,(dumfriesshire, ireland)

Offline LDaw

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 97
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Illegitimacy and adoption around 1909
« Reply #5 on: Friday 17 August 18 20:31 BST (UK) »
Was the usual family response one of shame or did it vary quite widely?

Online Gan Yam

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 583
  • Going Home - exploring my past
    • View Profile
Re: Illegitimacy and adoption around 1909
« Reply #6 on: Friday 17 August 18 21:04 BST (UK) »
Was the usual family response one of shame or did it vary quite widely?

I think it probably varied greatly and each family responded differently.  My grandmother certainly wasn't ostracized by her family.
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline greyhobbes02

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 9
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Illegitimacy and adoption around 1909
« Reply #7 on: Wednesday 23 August 23 11:05 BST (UK) »
My great-great-grandmother had 5 illegitimate children in total, all with different fathers I think. She was in service in various places so her parents took in 3 but clearly refused at the fourth as she moved away. The fifth died as a baby.
Her sister also had two illegitimate kids that they took in. Very kind parents, I'm sure a lot would have turned them away much sooner.