Author Topic: 1916 rising Dublin  (Read 3169 times)

Offline Sinann

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 10,848
    • View Profile
Re: 1916 rising Dublin
« Reply #9 on: Monday 03 September 18 00:29 BST (UK) »
Was Christopher's wife Elizabeth Kelly?
Is this the family?
http://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1911/Dublin/Trinity_Ward/Cumberland_Street__South/93121/

Christopher's father was James edited to correct name.
https://civilrecords.irishgenealogy.ie/churchrecords/images/marriage_returns/marriages_1891/10659/5884060.pdf

This info might prove useful proving one of the women was related to Christopher.

Do the women's death Certs say if they were married or single.



Offline Sinann

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 10,848
    • View Profile
Re: 1916 rising Dublin
« Reply #10 on: Monday 03 September 18 00:50 BST (UK) »
Are you sure the woman was related to Christopher not his wife?

Offline Diarmuidgannon1916

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 83
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1916 rising Dublin
« Reply #11 on: Monday 03 September 18 01:14 BST (UK) »
Are you sure the woman was related to Christopher not his wife?

Yes Christopher, sorry about messages

Online heywood

  • RootsChat Honorary
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 40,786
    • View Profile
Re: 1916 rising Dublin
« Reply #12 on: Monday 03 September 18 06:50 BST (UK) »
Hi Hallmark,

See post # 4

Yes I saw that.

Shock and cardiac arrest and also had postpartum haemorrage wouldn't make her a Civilian Casualty of the 1916 Easter Rising in Dublin.....

Re Post #4 - nothing to do with cause of death.

I just meant she was a civilian and maybe that is why she was not mentioned in the book you referenced.

Additionally.
Is that death now being accepted as the correct lady?
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Offline Sinann

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 10,848
    • View Profile
Re: 1916 rising Dublin
« Reply #13 on: Monday 03 September 18 07:14 BST (UK) »
As none of the women in the list appear to be a married Jordan, it's possible she is a niece (single or married) of Christopher.
Christopher had sisters.
Their parents are James Jordan and Mary Fitzpatrick.
At least some of their children can be found on Irish Genealogy church records.
Find the daughters, find who they married, find their daughters. Maybe there will be a match.

Online heywood

  • RootsChat Honorary
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 40,786
    • View Profile
Re: 1916 rising Dublin
« Reply #14 on: Monday 03 September 18 07:22 BST (UK) »
Here is the birth of the baby to Kate Walsh whose death was posted earlier.

https://civilrecords.irishgenealogy.ie/churchrecords/images/birth_returns/births_1916/01345/1555070.pdf

Baby, Mary Bridget 22nd May parents James, a soldier and Kate Newton (possibly Heaton).
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Diarmuidgannon1916

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 83
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1916 rising Dublin
« Reply #15 on: Tuesday 04 September 18 17:52 BST (UK) »
As none of the women in the list appear to be a married Jordan, it's possible she is a niece (single or married) of Christopher.
Christopher had sisters.
Their parents are James Jordan and Mary Fitzpatrick.
At least some of their children can be found on Irish Genealogy church records.
Find the daughters, find who they married, find their daughters. Maybe there will be a match.
Hi
There
I have found all daughters of James Jordan and Mary Fitzpatrick,
Christopher sisters,Ellen , born feb13th 1874, Agnes born 1876 30th Nov, Mary 1880 24th may ,katherine Aug 20th 1883, Margaret, June 27th 1885 , could only one marriage , katherine married 4th Feb 1914.

Offline Sinann

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 10,848
    • View Profile
Re: 1916 rising Dublin
« Reply #16 on: Wednesday 05 September 18 16:29 BST (UK) »
Katherine, Margaret and Mary wouldn't be old enough to have a married daughter so that rules them out.
Pushing things with Agnes and Ellen as well. Think this idea was a non runner.
I take it that this is James and Mary in 1901
http://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1901/Dublin/Trinity/Cumberland_Street_South/1310155/
and this is likely to be Katherine and Margaret in 1911
http://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1911/Dublin/South_Dock/Queen_s_Square/81072/

Had both parents died by 1911, if Mary was alive she may have recorded how many children she had and how many were living.

Offline Diarmuidgannon1916

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 83
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1916 rising Dublin
« Reply #17 on: Wednesday 05 September 18 16:49 BST (UK) »
Katherine, Margaret and Mary wouldn't be old enough to have a married daughter so that rules them out.
Pushing things with Agnes and Ellen as well. Think this idea was a non runner.
I take it that this is James and Mary in 1901
http://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1901/Dublin/Trinity/Cumberland_Street_South/1310155/
and this is likely to be Katherine and Margaret in 1911
http://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1911/Dublin/South_Dock/Queen_s_Square/81072/

Had both parents died by 1911, if Mary was alive she may have recorded how many children she had and how many were living.
Yes both census are correct sinann have them but only found marriage for katherine Jordan she married a thomas ballance Feb 4th 1914 that's seems correct because her father worked as a marble works.so Agnes and Ellen may or may not married.
So it look like I am back to the drawing board. Thanks for your efforts.