Author Topic: Returned from WW1 in 1918?  (Read 1653 times)

Offline jonw65

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 10,770
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Returned from WW1 in 1918?
« Reply #9 on: Saturday 22 September 18 14:10 BST (UK) »
Has a little "a" there as well, denoting an absent voter.

Offline stanmapstone

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 25,798
    • View Profile
Re: Returned from WW1 in 1918?
« Reply #10 on: Saturday 22 September 18 14:50 BST (UK) »
You can see a list of abbreviations used in the 20th Century in Electoral Registers at
http://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php?topic=800159.msg6583845#msg6583845

Stan
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Regorian

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,484
  • Henry Griffiths Jnr c1914, HMS Achilles
    • View Profile
Re: Returned from WW1 in 1918?
« Reply #11 on: Saturday 22 September 18 14:56 BST (UK) »
Could have been any reason. There were plenty of replacements ready for sending to France in later 1918, but Lloyd George held them back.
Griffiths Llandogo, Mitcheltroy, Mon. and Whitchurch Here (Also Edwards),  18th C., Griffiths FoD 19th Century.

Offline dtcoulson

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 674
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Returned from WW1 in 1918?
« Reply #12 on: Sunday 23 September 18 02:18 BST (UK) »
Hello Jon,

Big shock for me to see the 'a' on the left, following the number, whereas I had been looking at the 'NM' on the right and wondering why there was no 'a' next to it. Thanks heaps.

But to continue the mystery, I have screenshots of two ER listings dated 1918, one in which the name Thomas Coulson is followed by an 'R' and one in which 'NM' is on the right of the name.

I have no clue yet as to why there should be two distinct listings dated 1918, nor which of the two came first.

* To combat that, I have seen that the year-dates attached to the ER files aren't always correct.
In one instance, a file that appears on the search index as '1918' has on its front page 'Autumn 1919' when you look inside.

-DC