Author Topic: Missing the obvious or not?  (Read 7004 times)

Offline avm228

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 24,827
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Missing the obvious or not?
« Reply #18 on: Thursday 11 October 18 10:21 BST (UK) »
I've just found the baptism record of nee Smith and see it's at the Our Lady of Reconciliation de la Salette church, interestingly is where his first born son's marriage takes place (although his own marriage is at St Anthony's)

It’s a pity he (apparently) didn’t marry in the church where he was baptised - sometimes when they did the priest would helpfully go back and annotate the baptism record with the date of marriage and name of the spouse :)
Ayr: Barnes, Wylie
Caithness: MacGregor
Essex: Eldred (Pebmarsh)
Gloucs: Timbrell (Winchcomb)
Hants: Stares (Wickham)
Lincs: Maw, Jackson (Epworth, Belton)
London: Pierce
Suffolk: Markham (Framlingham)
Surrey: Gosling (Richmond)
Wilts: Matthews, Tarrant (Calne, Preshute)
Worcs: Milward (Redditch)
Yorks: Beaumont, Crook, Moore, Styring (Huddersfield); Middleton (Church Fenton); Exley, Gelder (High Hoyland); Barnes, Birchinall (Sheffield); Kenyon, Wood (Cumberworth/Denby Dale)

Online ShaunJ

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 24,109
    • View Profile
Re: Missing the obvious or not?
« Reply #19 on: Thursday 11 October 18 10:28 BST (UK) »
Quote
I've just found the baptism record of nee Smith and see it's at the Our Lady of Reconciliation de la Salette

I did mention that in Reply#2
UK Census info. Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Horsley2016

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 294
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Missing the obvious or not?
« Reply #20 on: Thursday 11 October 18 10:42 BST (UK) »
Spot on Shaun, as always a million thanks. Great to have you all take interest and help. Amazing learning along the way with maps and district registration info! Not to mention I've learned to search the baptism records as a way of reconciling off possibles and finding another route in to a search!

Mx

Offline wivenhoe

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,556
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Missing the obvious or not?
« Reply #21 on: Thursday 11 October 18 11:19 BST (UK) »
What children do you have for James KENNEDY and Julia McCARTHY?


Offline Horsley2016

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 294
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Missing the obvious or not?
« Reply #22 on: Thursday 11 October 18 11:40 BST (UK) »
What children do you have for James KENNEDY and Julia McCARTHY?

Hi there,

I have William Kennedy born 8 Apr 1897 (2 months after their marriage....) and James Joseph Kennedy born 7 Oct 1912.

Bit of a gap isn't there?    ???

M

Online ShaunJ

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 24,109
    • View Profile
Re: Missing the obvious or not?
« Reply #23 on: Thursday 11 October 18 11:46 BST (UK) »
There was another child born on 3 July 1902 - James - baptised on 7 July at St Sylvesters.
UK Census info. Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline avm228

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 24,827
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Missing the obvious or not?
« Reply #24 on: Thursday 11 October 18 11:55 BST (UK) »
There was another child born on 3 July 1902 - James - baptised on 7 July at St Sylvesters.

Possibly buried 13 Dec 1908, aged 6, at Ford Cemetery.

There’s also a James Kennedy burial at Ford in Dec 1903, but the age of 14 months doesn’t match a July birthday.
Ayr: Barnes, Wylie
Caithness: MacGregor
Essex: Eldred (Pebmarsh)
Gloucs: Timbrell (Winchcomb)
Hants: Stares (Wickham)
Lincs: Maw, Jackson (Epworth, Belton)
London: Pierce
Suffolk: Markham (Framlingham)
Surrey: Gosling (Richmond)
Wilts: Matthews, Tarrant (Calne, Preshute)
Worcs: Milward (Redditch)
Yorks: Beaumont, Crook, Moore, Styring (Huddersfield); Middleton (Church Fenton); Exley, Gelder (High Hoyland); Barnes, Birchinall (Sheffield); Kenyon, Wood (Cumberworth/Denby Dale)

Offline wivenhoe

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,556
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Missing the obvious or not?
« Reply #25 on: Thursday 11 October 18 12:01 BST (UK) »
Census 1901 @  72 Virgil Street
KENNEDY James     25y                                 b. Liverpool
KENNEDY Julia        23y                                 b. Liverpool
KENNEDY William     3y                                  b. Liverpool
KENNEDY Daniel     18y     visitor                    b. Liverpool

The 1911 census has James and Julia KENNEDY, married 14 years. No children with them.

The 1911 census has Daniel KENNEDY 30y, wife Catherine 29y, married 9 years, and daughter Bridget 2y.
Also niece Ellen KENNEDY 6y  and nephew Christfer 3y

GRO birth
KENNEDY, Christopher mms.  MCCARTHY     
1907  DQ Liverpool  Vol 08b  pg 49

KENNEDY Bridget  mms. McCARTHY
1909 JQ Liverpool   Vol 08b  pg13   

Marriage
KENNEDY Daniel    m.  Catherine McCARTHY
SQ 1902 Vol Liverpool Vol 08b  pg234

I think it is likely that James KENNEDY b. Liverpool 1876/7, and Daniel KENNEDY b. ~1880 Liverpool, are brothers.

Offline carol8353

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 17,589
  • Me,mum and dad and both gran's c 1955
    • View Profile
Re: Missing the obvious or not?
« Reply #26 on: Thursday 11 October 18 12:03 BST (UK) »
In 1901 the family appear at 4 (72), Virgil Street, Liverpool.

James Kennedy 25 Ship Scalar b L'pool
Julia Kennedy wife 22 b L'pool
William Kennedy son 3 b L'pool

Also a Daniel Kennedy boarder single 18 b 1883 Ship Scalar b L'pool

(a possible brother?)

RG13/3407
Folio   104
Page   17

Snap Wivenhoe
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk