...and here is the text as I couldn't fit it into my previous posting:
Now the latest discovery, from the Hampshire Telegraph and Sussex Chronicle of 12th March 1881.
I quote the article in full to help put it in context: and my question is, was this march back to British India under pressure of weather or of enemy action? It certainly looks as if he was under pressure and over-reacted – indeed judging from the article I'm surprised he was only found guilty on one count, and the effects on poor Khodadad Khan were pretty dire. What were the 24th Native Infantry doing, had they had a mauling at the hands of the Afghans?
SERIOUS CHARGES AGAINST AN OFFICER -.At a general court-martial, assembled at Mooltan on January 10th. 1881, Captain John James Money-Simons, 24th Bengal N.I., was charged with conduct to the prejudice of good order and military discipline, in the following instances :-First,- having, when in command of a detachment on the line of march from Afghanistan to British India, on October 2nd, 1880, upon a hasty and wholly insufficient inquiry, ordered Khodadad Khan, a sepoy of the 24th Bengal N.I., to be flogged for the alleged offence that he had neglected to obey the detachment order which prohibited any soldier from riding in a cart without permission of competent authority, whereas he, Khodadad Khan, had in fact received the permission of Hospital Assistant Mahommed Yassein Khan, of the Subordinate Medical Department, to ride on a hospital cart, because he, Khodadad Khan, was suffering from a sore heel, the said Mahommed Yassein Khan being under such conditions competent authority. Second, - With having, when in command of a detachment on the line of march from Afghanistan to British India, on October 2, 1880, administered corporal punishment to Khodadad Khan, a sepoy of the 24th Bengal N.I., illegally, that is to say, without trial. Third, with having, when in command of a detachment on the line of march from Afghanistan to British India, on October 2, 1880, administered corporal punishment to Khodadad Khan. a Sepoy of the 24th Bengal N.I. otherwise than upon the bare back in accordance with the usage of the Service, by which conduct he, Khodadad Khan, believed that a stigma was cast upon him, and that he was disgraced in the eyes of his comrades. The Court found that Captain Money-Simons was not guilty of the first instance of the charge; guilty of the second instance of the charge; not guilty of the third instance of the charge; and guilty of the preamble of the charge as respects its application to the second instance of the same only: in and sentenced him to be reprimanded. In confirming the decision the Commander-in-Chief gives the following reasons for commuting the court-martial sentence of death on Khodadad, the sepoy concerned in Captain Money-Simons' case. for firing at a superior officer:- “In my minute on the proceedings of the general court-martial held on Khodadad, sepoy, 24th Punjab [sic] N.I.. I stated that my reasons for commuting the sentence to transportation for life would be published to the Army. Those reasons are contained in the proceedings of the present court-martial on Captain Money-Simons, who has been convicted of conduct to the prejudice of good order and military discipline, in having illegally flogged Sepoy Khodadad. Although it is not any justification, yet when I was called upon to confirm the sentence of death, I was confronted with the fact that the crime of the prisoner had its origin in the illegal act of his superior officer, Capt. Money-Simons, and I was constrained by this cause to to commute the sentence to transportation for life."