Author Topic: John HOADL(E)Y  (Read 7242 times)

Offline sillgen

  • RootsChat Honorary
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 11,523
    • View Profile
Re: John HOADL(E)Y
« Reply #9 on: Thursday 13 October 05 19:17 BST (UK) »
I would be concerned that Rotherfield is not exactly close to Eastbourne.   In fact it is miles away!  Andrea

Offline gougy

  • I am sorry my emails are not working
  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 925
    • View Profile
Re: John HOADL(E)Y
« Reply #10 on: Thursday 13 October 05 19:24 BST (UK) »
Could it be Easebourne mistranscribed?
Sussex:<br />Lishers of Sompting, Cunninghams of Houghton, Hammonds of Angmering, Humphrey, Hambleton, Ayling, Pope, Gent<br />
London: Le Franc, Watson, Read<br />
Cornwall: Phillips of St. Ives, Chappells of Penwith<br />Ireland: O'Connors of Co. Clare<br /><br />Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline sillgen

  • RootsChat Honorary
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 11,523
    • View Profile
Re: John HOADL(E)Y
« Reply #11 on: Thursday 13 October 05 19:30 BST (UK) »
That would create a chaos!   It is in West Sussex and even more miles away.   Interesting thought though.  It has happened before.
I have now looked at the census records from 1861 on and it is obviously the same man with wife Maria born Benenden Kent in all the records.  The 1881 has ditto marks for Rotherfield so may have been an enumerator's error but the 91 and 1901 actually have it written out.   Very odd.   It probably means a visit to Lewes Record office if at all possible and just trawling through all the local parish registers until you find him.  Otherwise getting the films from your local LDS centre.  A long job ahead!
Andrea

Offline Yip0905

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 9
    • View Profile
Re: John HOADL(E)Y
« Reply #12 on: Thursday 13 October 05 22:14 BST (UK) »
Hi all

Thanks for all the input  :)

That Henry is a possibility - I'll have to check that out.

With the Eastbourne, I have had a look at the original (through Ancestry) and it definately looks like Eastbourne not Easebourne to me.

As you say Sillgen, a long job ahead!

Once again, thank you all.

Yip


Offline emmatwiglet

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 2
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: John HOADL(E)Y
« Reply #13 on: Sunday 17 September 06 12:05 BST (UK) »


My family name is Hoadley

Offline sillgen

  • RootsChat Honorary
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 11,523
    • View Profile
Re: John HOADL(E)Y
« Reply #14 on: Sunday 17 September 06 12:49 BST (UK) »
Hi emmatwiglet
Welcome to Rootschat.    Do your Hoadley family come from Sussex?
Andrea

Offline emmatwiglet

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 2
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: John HOADL(E)Y
« Reply #15 on: Sunday 17 September 06 14:38 BST (UK) »
No from East London.

Offline snoulton

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 78
    • View Profile
Re: John HOADL(E)Y
« Reply #16 on: Sunday 19 November 06 17:45 GMT (UK) »
Hello, hope this may help you

East Dean PR's [East Sussex]

23 March 1834 John Townsend Hoadley was christened, the son of Henry and Ann Hoadley

Henry Hoadley married Ann Bond 23 June 1833 at East Dean

Regards........Brenda

Offline Daisypetal

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 4,374
    • View Profile
Re: John HOADL(E)Y
« Reply #17 on: Monday 20 November 06 10:07 GMT (UK) »
Hi,

Could this be John in 1841 with his BOND relatives,

1841  HO107/1118/12  f.6  p.5  East Dean

John BONDS     60  Ag Lab
Susan             67
James             30
John               26
Susan             14
William            11
John HOADLEY   7               All born in County


Regards
Daisy
All Census Data included in this post is Crown Copyright (see: www.nationalarchives.gov.uk)