RootsChat.Com

England (Counties as in 1851-1901) => England => Norfolk => Topic started by: Spidermonkey on Saturday 26 November 16 13:35 GMT (UK)

Title: Robert Reeve - Honingham
Post by: Spidermonkey on Saturday 26 November 16 13:35 GMT (UK)
Dear all,

I have having trouble moving backwards from Robert Reeve (c. 1725 - 1797).  I have found him in the 1768 poll book for Honingham (occupying land owned by John Cork, if I am reading it correctly).  I then have him marrying Ann Grand/Grant by licence in 1771.  On the licence, it states that both Robert and Ann were widower/widow, but I can't find a previous marriage for either of them.  On the licence, Robert gives his profession as shoemaker, resident in Honingham.  Ann was from East Tuddenham.

I would appreciate any hints or suggestions (or answers!!).

Many thanks,

Spidermonkey
Title: Re: Robert Reeve - Honingham
Post by: The Yokel on Saturday 26 November 16 16:42 GMT (UK)
Hi

Have you seen the baptism of Robert Reeve 13 March 1730 in North Tuddenham
see:- http://www.rootschat.com/links/01iwu/

edit:-
Ah, looks like he was buried in 1731 http://www.rootschat.com/links/01iwv/

yokel
Title: Re: Robert Reeve - Honingham
Post by: Spidermonkey on Saturday 26 November 16 19:04 GMT (UK)
Thank you for looking, Yokel!
Title: Re: Robert Reeve - Honingham
Post by: mijath on Tuesday 06 December 16 02:29 GMT (UK)
Hello, you've probably seen that Robert and Ann have at least three sons, baptised in Honingham after their marriage - Thomas (1771) Robert (1773) and Stephen (1776).

I notice that a Tabitha, daughter of Robert Reeve and an unnamed wife is buried in the same parish in 1765.

It could be coincidence, but in the parish of Swannington (about seven miles to the north), a Robert REEVES is born to Roger and Tabitha in 1724, baptised on June 15th. Roger Reeve married Tabitha Curtis in Swannington in 1715.


Mike
Title: Re: Robert Reeve - Honingham
Post by: Spidermonkey on Tuesday 06 December 16 09:15 GMT (UK)
Thank you Mike - I hadn't come across the Roger and Tabitha Reeves entry before.  It would certainly be worth investigating, I think!

Once again, thank you for pointing that one out!