RootsChat.Com

England (Counties as in 1851-1901) => England => Cumberland => Topic started by: moiramount on Friday 08 July 22 18:09 BST (UK)

Title: James Fearon b1871 Cockermouth
Post by: moiramount on Friday 08 July 22 18:09 BST (UK)
Hi, I have a James Fearon b1871Cockermouth
He married Clara Brook/s in 1894 Cockermouth. There is also a James Henderson Fearon born 1871 MMS Clark. This is where the puzzle starts. James no2 his parents are Joseph b1831 and either Mary or Elizabeth. On the 1871 census mother is Mary, 1881 census it's Elizabeth then 1891 it's Elizabeth. I've found a marriage in 1869 between Joseph and Elizabeth Young nee Clark in Cockermouth. On the census there is a William Clark stepson. No marriage for a Mary. Is it the same person, is James and James H the same person. Then to add to the mix there is another James Fearon born Cockermouth 1871, mother Mary Fearon living with Grandparents Downey. My head is a shed. On family trees in Ancestry they have Mary Henderson and Elizabeth Clark for Joseph's spouses.
Hopefully someone can sort it for me.
Thankyou
Title: Re: James Fearon b1871 Cockermouth
Post by: heywood on Friday 08 July 22 18:58 BST (UK)
Who is named as his father on the marriage certificate and what is the father’s occupation?
Title: Re: James Fearon b1871 Cockermouth
Post by: heywood on Friday 08 July 22 19:07 BST (UK)
There is a death for James Fearon aged 1 yr in December 1871

He is possibly the James William Fearon b 1870 with no mother’s maiden name.
He us then likely to the one with grandparents.

You seem to have 3 x James. Is that right?
Title: Re: James Fearon b1871 Cockermouth
Post by: amondg on Friday 08 July 22 19:46 BST (UK)
Using the children's names on the 1871 census

John Henry  1869 has mother maiden name Clark
James H  (Henderson) 1871 mother's maiden name Clark

The other children
William, Edmund and Elizabeth are not under Fearon or Clark unless they are under Henderson
they have a different mother.
Title: Re: James Fearon b1871 Cockermouth
Post by: moiramount on Friday 08 July 22 20:00 BST (UK)
Hi Heywood, no just two James seeing as the other one died in 1871.
I am doing a search for someone else and they don't have the certificate.
Title: Re: James Fearon b1871 Cockermouth
Post by: heywood on Friday 08 July 22 20:45 BST (UK)
Hi Heywood, no just two James seeing as the other one died in 1871.
I am doing a search for someone else and they don't have the certificate.

Where do you have the two James?
Title: Re: James Fearon b1871 Cockermouth
Post by: moiramount on Friday 08 July 22 20:49 BST (UK)
James and James H but I think they are the same person, but if James Henderson Fearon was named after his mother Mary ? why does he have Clark on his birth.
Title: Re: James Fearon b1871 Cockermouth
Post by: heywood on Friday 08 July 22 21:01 BST (UK)
His birth certificate would give his parents’ names and the marriage certificate would confirm this through the father’s name.

Title: Re: James Fearon b1871 Cockermouth
Post by: heywood on Friday 08 July 22 21:28 BST (UK)
Here is the transcription of the Fearon/Young/Clark marriage 1869
https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:HWQN-J66Z
Title: Re: James Fearon b1871 Cockermouth
Post by: moiramount on Friday 08 July 22 21:32 BST (UK)
 thankyou, just Mary's to find now
Title: Re: James Fearon b1871 Cockermouth
Post by: heywood on Friday 08 July 22 21:40 BST (UK)
Joseph is single according to that marriage record.
Perhaps Elizabeth and Mary are the same person.
Title: Re: James Fearon b1871 Cockermouth
Post by: amondg on Saturday 09 July 22 07:51 BST (UK)
Have you followed Elizabeth Young nee Clark ?

Was her mother widowed and remarried to Henderson
Title: Re: James Fearon b1871 Cockermouth
Post by: moiramount on Saturday 09 July 22 10:59 BST (UK)
No but I will check that out, thankyou
Title: Re: James Fearon b1871 Cockermouth
Post by: heywood on Saturday 09 July 22 12:02 BST (UK)
Father in law may also mean step father

James Henderson ‘father in law’ though is very difficult to trace before and after 1871.

If that marriage is correct, and you would have to check, why would he marry Elizabeth in 1869 but live with Mary in 1871?
Title: Re: James Fearon b1871 Cockermouth
Post by: moiramount on Saturday 09 July 22 12:38 BST (UK)
I've just gone to print that Young marriage off and at the side there were some births, I clicked on John Henry who was 1 yr in 1871 census and Elizabeth was his mother. There are 3 more children born before 1869 when he married Elizabeth. William,Edmund and Elizabeth, 61.63 and 65 they were born. Mary is on here as Joseph's wife. I thought did Elizabeth have these to her last husband and gave them the Fearon name, if so who is Mary.
Title: Re: James Fearon b1871 Cockermouth
Post by: heywood on Saturday 09 July 22 13:15 BST (UK)
I have seen instances where a woman (or man for that matter) is called by one name and then another.
It might be an error on the census too.
At the moment we have no idea.

I have tried to search for those births but nothing definite and for later sightings in censuses or marriages.
Title: Re: James Fearon b1871 Cockermouth
Post by: heywood on Saturday 09 July 22 13:24 BST (UK)
This is perhaps Elizabeth  in 1881 5170 /110/9

Elizabeth Young, 15 yrs Servant b Keswick in the home of the Tickle family in Above Derwent.
Title: Re: James Fearon b1871 Cockermouth
Post by: moiramount on Saturday 09 July 22 13:53 BST (UK)
The William born 1861 is now William B Clarke stepson in 1881. It's driving me nuts, I will call it a day on this one for now, thanks for all your help.
Title: Re: James Fearon b1871 Cockermouth
Post by: heywood on Saturday 09 July 22 15:15 BST (UK)
Yes, we don’t seem to be getting anywhere and I can only reiterate that certificates might be more helpful.
In 1881 5171/11/3
William Clarke has been transcribed as William B but if you look at the census page, it looks like ‘N’. In fact there have been user submissions with corrections to ‘N’ too.

In 1891 4300/115
William Clark has his birthplace as Hensingham. This seems to be in Whitehaven district.
There is a birth December quarter 1861 Whitehaven
William Nevason Clark with no mother’s name.

Title: Re: James Fearon b1871 Cockermouth
Post by: moiramount on Saturday 09 July 22 15:26 BST (UK)
Yes I checked the three children I mentioned and no mother's name on any of them
Title: Re: James Fearon b1871 Cockermouth
Post by: heywood on Saturday 09 July 22 15:31 BST (UK)
Did you already have a birth for William?

Have you found the births for Edmund and Elizabeth?

I don’t think I found them.

Title: Re: James Fearon b1871 Cockermouth
Post by: moiramount on Saturday 09 July 22 15:40 BST (UK)
William under Fearon
Edmund under Young
Elizabeth Young too b ,Whitehaven
Title: Re: James Fearon b1871 Cockermouth
Post by: heywood on Saturday 09 July 22 15:54 BST (UK)
Sorry about this do you have the dates?
I can see
1863 Edmund Young Whitehaven mmn Walker

There is a William Walker Fearon mmn Walker in 1861 but why would he be Fearon?

Both Elizabeth Youngs b Whitehaven have mother’s names too.

Am I going wrong somewhere?
Title: Re: James Fearon b1871 Cockermouth
Post by: moiramount on Saturday 09 July 22 15:57 BST (UK)
It's like a minefield out there, my brain is mashed lol. Thanks for your help, much appreciated but I think I will leave it for now otherwise we both will be mad
Title: Re: James Fearon b1871 Cockermouth
Post by: heywood on Saturday 09 July 22 16:08 BST (UK)
Certificates!
Unfortunately, that seems to be the only way.
Title: Re: James Fearon b1871 Cockermouth
Post by: moiramount on Saturday 09 July 22 16:21 BST (UK)
Thankyou
Title: Re: James Fearon b1871 Cockermouth
Post by: heywood on Sunday 10 July 22 07:01 BST (UK)
Just for your information -  you might want to note for any future search

September 1863 Whitehaven

Edward (often interchanged with Edmund) Young mmn Clark

I found too a possible Elizabeth Clark through censuses to 1861  but no marriage to Mr Young  :-\