RootsChat.Com
Old Photographs, Recognition, Handwriting Deciphering => Handwriting Deciphering & Recognition => Topic started by: martin hooper on Tuesday 16 April 24 12:04 BST (UK)
-
Hello
Two signatures this time for comparison, forty years apart. Martha Perrin married a Thomas Hancock on 4 Jun 1787 in North Nibley, Gloucestershire. Her signature in the register in the top one.
A Thomas Hancock died in 1827 - his wife applied for a Letter of Administration. Her signature is the lower one.
We can only compare on the word Martha - even though the two examples of writing are 40 years apart they seem to be quite different to me. Which suggests that the marriage of Martha Perrin is to a different Thomas Hancock.
Any thoughts?
Martin
-
Hmmm. My first reaction was that they are not by the same person: the capital M is quite different and the second signature has much more of a forward slant.
However, having said that, the formation of the letters "a" and "r" are quite similar.
Another thought: might the later one be a transcription?
-
ShaunJ
It's definitely not a transcription - there are two other signatures in different handwriting.
Can a person's handwriting change that much from aged early 20s to early 60s?
My problem is that I can't find any other marriage between a Thomas Hancock and a Martha. And the date of the marriage fits conveniently with the birth of the first child just over a year later.
Thanks
Martin
-
I think there's a good chance they're by the same person. The "artha" and also the "n" in the surnames look very alike (apart from the slant which, I think, could easily change in 40 years). The form of the "M" is a cause for doubt, certainly, but I know from personal experience some people are not consistent in the form they use.