RootsChat.Com

General => The Common Room => The Lighter Side => Topic started by: Top-of-the-hill on Wednesday 27 November 24 21:56 GMT (UK)

Title: Interesting occupation
Post by: Top-of-the-hill on Wednesday 27 November 24 21:56 GMT (UK)
  Looking someone up in the 1921 census, I was surprised to see that among other things he was listed as "daisy farmer". On looking at the original I was quite disappointed!
  I am assuming that the second word on the lower line is "forage" but it is a very strange f.
Title: Re: Interesting occupation
Post by: youngtug on Wednesday 27 November 24 22:10 GMT (UK)
Corn & Forage merchant [with a mangled F ]   The "F" in farmer is similar
Title: Re: Interesting occupation
Post by: Jebber on Wednesday 27 November 24 22:34 GMT (UK)
I agree Corn and Forage Merchant and Dairy Farmer.
Title: Re: Interesting occupation
Post by: maddys52 on Thursday 28 November 24 08:28 GMT (UK)
Shame it wasn't a daisy farmer, sounds quite nice.  ;D ;D
Title: Re: Interesting occupation
Post by: DianaCanada on Thursday 28 November 24 22:05 GMT (UK)
Lots of Daisy Farmer births on Free BMD!
Title: Re: Interesting occupation
Post by: Top-of-the-hill on Thursday 28 November 24 22:19 GMT (UK)
  Well, he wasn't a daisy farmer, but he had a good name - Felix Bourne. It caught my eye as I thought he would be part of my husband's family, which I have confirmed with a bit of a struggle. He was a first cousin of husband's grandfather.
Title: Re: Interesting occupation
Post by: MollyC on Friday 29 November 24 08:20 GMT (UK)
His handwriting is very similar to that of my paternal grandmother, neat and distinctive.
Title: Re: Interesting occupation
Post by: Gadget on Friday 29 November 24 09:06 GMT (UK)
Oh dear, apologies but  I thought it was more 'style over substance' 
Title: Re: Interesting occupation
Post by: MollyC on Friday 29 November 24 09:29 GMT (UK)
I suppose I got used to it over the years!  There are some captions in her photo albums written on the dark album pages which might be difficult if I did not know the general context.
Title: Re: Interesting occupation
Post by: Top-of-the-hill on Friday 29 November 24 10:57 GMT (UK)
  He did work himself up from fairly lowly circumstances to be a man of considerable substance, so a bit of showing off might be understandable!
Title: Re: Interesting occupation
Post by: Gadget on Friday 29 November 24 12:54 GMT (UK)
Was this the original form that individual household heads completed or the form  or the completed register?

It looks like the final register to me.
Title: Re: Interesting occupation
Post by: JenB on Friday 29 November 24 13:05 GMT (UK)
I just took a look. Someone has written everything out for him. Take a look at his signature bottom right of the form.
Title: Re: Interesting occupation
Post by: Gadget on Friday 29 November 24 13:35 GMT (UK)
1've just been looking up the process. This from Wiki:

Quote
In England and Wales, a team of 65,000 enumerators[7] delivered forms ahead of the chosen day. On Friday 29 September 1939, householders were required to record details on the registration forms. On the following Sunday and Monday the enumerators visited every householder, checked the form and then issued a completed identity card for each of the residents. All cards at this time were the same brown/buff colour. Some 45 million identity cards were issued.[6] The estimate of the population of England and Wales for 1939 was 41.465 million exclusive of army, navy and merchant seamen abroad,[8] and some sources record the register as [clarification needed]so the figure of 45 million may include the members of the armed forces abroad or in Scotland.

So it would seem that, the individual household forms were then used to compile a 'living register' for use to record changes in individuals' identities.

ADD - And, obviously, in addition to Identity Cards, they were used for Ration Cards, National Health info, etc.

 add 2 - I did know this but was unsure of how the info was collected and collated.




Title: Re: Interesting occupation
Post by: JenB on Friday 29 November 24 14:07 GMT (UK)
Was this the original form that individual household heads completed or the form  or the completed register?

I thought it was the 1921 census - at least that's what I looked at  :-\
Title: Re: Interesting occupation
Post by: Gadget on Friday 29 November 24 14:14 GMT (UK)
 :-[ :-[ :-[

Oh dear  I was drawn to the handnwriting  and somehow thought it was the 1939!

As you found, Jennifer,  the signature of the HofH/the person giving the info was different to the one showm in the snip.
Title: Re: Interesting occupation
Post by: Top-of-the-hill on Friday 29 November 24 15:16 GMT (UK)
  How very confusing. The signature bottom right is certainly different, and it looks as if the housekeeper wrote the rest. The writing varies a bit, but not much.