RootsChat.Com

England (Counties as in 1851-1901) => England => Huntingdonshire => Topic started by: castlebob on Thursday 26 March 09 18:42 GMT (UK)

Title: Woodlands/forests owned by the Duke of Manchester
Post by: castlebob on Thursday 26 March 09 18:42 GMT (UK)
Hello All,
Does anyone know of any woodlands/forests in Hunts that were owned by the Duke of Manchester? A distant branch of my family worked the woods there in the 1800s, I believe.
Cheers
Bob
Title: Re: Duke of Manchester
Post by: bedfordshire boy on Saturday 28 March 09 08:43 GMT (UK)
The 1873 Return of Owners of Land shows the Duke of Manchester of Kimbolton Castle, as owning 13,585 acres of land having a gross estimated rental of £20,589-11-0. There's no breakdown of where the land is situated, nor is there a breakdown of the type of land.

David
Title: Re: Duke of Manchester
Post by: castlebob on Saturday 28 March 09 09:07 GMT (UK)
Thanks David,
Pretty substantial acreage! One of my ancestors was thought to have managed some woods/forests for the Duke, plus Carderet in Beds
Bob
Title: Re: Duke of Manchester
Post by: linmey on Tuesday 19 May 09 20:03 BST (UK)
He also rented the sporting rights to my GG grandfathers land for of £8 per annum. You would think that his own 13,585 acres would have been enough to keep him happy wouldnt you!!! ::) ;)

Linda.
Title: Re: Duke of Manchester
Post by: castlebob on Tuesday 19 May 09 20:31 BST (UK)
True, Linda
Probably shot out the wildlife on his own land!
Cheers
Bob
Title: Re: Duke of Manchester
Post by: linmey on Tuesday 19 May 09 20:39 BST (UK)
In the 1920s the Duke used to hunt there with George V and his sons and then pop in and expect to be fed and I believe on occasions had picnic lunches brought out into the fields.
Obviously thats what happened to the family fortune Bob!! ;)

Linda.
Title: Re: Duke of Manchester
Post by: castlebob on Tuesday 19 May 09 21:20 BST (UK)
Fascinating stuff!
Bob
Title: Re: Duke of Manchester
Post by: linmey on Wednesday 20 May 09 07:22 BST (UK)
All very `feudal` back then wasnt it! So many of my family seem to have been employed by the Duke from gamekeepers to laundry women. I went round kimbolton Castle last November. I expect you have been Bob.

Linda.
Title: Re: Duke of Manchester
Post by: castlebob on Wednesday 16 December 09 19:02 GMT (UK)
 
 Do you know if forestry records survive from the 1800s?
Thanks,
Bob
Title: Re: Duke of Manchester
Post by: castlebob on Saturday 08 January 11 05:25 GMT (UK)
A distant branch of my family worked in forests apparently owned by the Duke in Hunts. They did so in the 1800s. I have no knowledge of anything else connected to the Duke, other than that extremely tenuous link.
Bob
Title: Re: Duke of Manchester
Post by: linmey on Saturday 08 January 11 12:09 GMT (UK)
Hi David,
I expect my family were partly to blame for the servant shortage and probably found more lucrative employment elsewhere, which is why they can now afford to be educated in said `properity`.  ::)

Linda.
Title: Re: Duke of Manchester
Post by: Berlin-Bob on Tuesday 11 January 11 20:31 GMT (UK)
I think castebob's query has been answered and the topic can be marked as completed.

The other discussion about the Duke of Manchester belongs elsewhere, not here.


Berlin-Bob