RootsChat.Com

Research in Other Countries => Australia => Topic started by: akissling on Sunday 22 March 15 19:32 GMT (UK)

Title: Geelong 1856-58
Post by: akissling on Sunday 22 March 15 19:32 GMT (UK)
My ancestor James Stanaway lived in Geelong from at least 1856 to 1858. He married Ellen Prescott of Lancashire and had at least one daughter, Ellen Elizabeth (born in 1857, died 1858). According to his marriage certificate he lived on C* and Yarra St. in Geelong. I am wondering if there are any resources to help me find out what he was doing there. I assume that he followed the gold rush as he originally moved from Cornwall to Wisconsin and ended up in El Dorado, California in 1850. I know that he came back to the US with Ellen because he is back in the US census in 1860. Thanks for any information or resources that you can recommend.
Title: Re: Geelong 1856-58
Post by: Nova67 on Sunday 22 March 15 20:35 GMT (UK)
Certainly plenty of work for a mason in the 1850's in Geelong, with many prominent buildings erected:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geelong.

Cannot find any James Stanaway on Trove in this time period:
https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper

On a quick look, sorry if I have missed something!
Cannot find him arriving in Australia, only leaving in 1858, but mentions Ellen Elizabeth Stanaway born 1857, who died at six months in Victoria in 1858.

And yet...

Victoria outward passenger lists 1852-1915 Transcription
First name(s)
Children With

Last name
Stanaway

Age
Child

Birth year
1858

Departure year
1858

Departure month
Mar

Destination
San Francisco, United States

Ship name
Lucy L Hale

Ship's master
Lull William

State
Victoria

Record set
Victoria outward passenger lists 1852-1915

Category
Travel & migration

Subcategory
Passenger lists

Collections from
Australasia

I guess it is a relatively short time period.This is the Geelong Family History Group: http://home.vicnet.net.au/~gfamhist/
Title: Re: Geelong 1856-58
Post by: cando on Sunday 22 March 15 23:31 GMT (UK)
James and Ellen obviously had another child as indicated by the entry on the Outward Passenger Index at Public Record Office of Victoria
http://www.rootschat.com/links/01f01/


They may not have stayed in Geelong as the death registration of the child born in 1857 at Geelong, shows BORN Geelong not died at Geelong.

Cando
Title: Re: Geelong 1856-58
Post by: cando on Sunday 22 March 15 23:54 GMT (UK)
I checked the 1860 census [Diamond Springs, El Dorado, California Roll M653_58 Page 785 Image 167]  and J STANAWAY b. England 45 years, mason, at Diamond Springs, Eldorado, California with a wife E, b. England 29 years however in the same household there are other STANAWAY's - male born England 20 years, farmer, and several children born Wisconsin.
Perhaps I have the wrong family.  Was James married previously?

Mmm James STANAWAY born England, miner, living at El Dorado on the 1850 US Census is 42 years of age. ::)

And age on marriage registration in 1855 is 41.

And according to his obituary, in 1904, was born England 1803.

http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GRid=17999572&ref=acom

Ellen died 1891
http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GRid=17999588&ref=acom

Cando
Title: Re: Geelong 1856-58
Post by: cando on Monday 23 March 15 02:38 GMT (UK)
Quote
According to his marriage certificate he lived on C* and Yarra St. in Geelong.

He lived in C**l*n Lane, which was off Yarra Street.   Yarra Street and Myers Street intersect. There are a couple of lanes that still exist off Yarra Street but no C**l*n Lane.

Unless James did something newsworthy which was reported in the newspapers of the day,  I doubt you will find anything about his life in Geelong.

Cando

Title: Re: Geelong 1856-58
Post by: judb on Monday 23 March 15 05:27 GMT (UK)
As Cando has already said there is no C*** Lane off Yarra St in Geelong now.  If you look on Googlemap you can see that there are only modern buildings on the north end of Yarra St, towards the beach area, so I suspect the C*** lane has been built over.  Judith
Title: Re: Geelong 1856-58
Post by: cando on Monday 23 March 15 06:15 GMT (UK)
James was married previously and  on the 1850 US Census his wife Jane and children are in Wisconsin.  I wonder if he had one of the children with him in Geelong.

http://www.cornwall-opc-database.org/search-database/
STANAWAY James  Batchelor  Of this Parish
BROWN Jane  Spinster   Of this Parish
16 Oct 1834
Parish Or Reg District   Probus

1841 Census HO107/148/5/8/33/13
Living at Probus, Cornwall
STANAWAY James 30  Mason  Born county
STANAWAY Janes  30   Born county
STANAWAY Ellen  5  Born county
STANAWAY Samuel 1 Born county

and a few doors away

STANAWAY James  60   Mason  Born county
STANAWAY Ellen    50    Born county
STANAWAY Caroline  18  Dressmaker  Born county
STANAWAY Mary  15  Born county
STANAWAY Hannah  10  Born county
GILES Elizabeth  60  Seamstress  Born county  [Is this Ellen/Eleanor's sister?]

Marriage in the Parish of Probus
STANAWAY James
GILES Elenor
10 Jan 1805

This looks like James baptism in the Parish of Probus so born 1806.  Eleanor aka Ellen.
http://www.cornwall-opc-database.org/search-database/
STANAWAY James
27 Dec 1807
Sex - son
Father James
Mother Eleanor
Notes   age 14 weeks; mother formerly TEALS - could this be GILES?  James' obituary refers to him as James G STANAWAY.

James and family emigrated to Canada prior to living in Wisconsin.

1850 US Census   
Living at Shullsburg, Lafayette, Wisconsin
STANAWAY Jane  41 years  Born England
STANAWAY Ellen A 14 years  Born England
STANAWAY Samuel  10 years  Born England
STANAWAY James  6 years  Born Canada West
STANAWAY Alice  5 years  Born Canada West
STANAWAY George W  3 years  Born Wisconsin
STANAWAY Henrietta  9 months  Born Wisconsin

You possibly have all this but I was curious after finding James' obituary.

Names of James parents on this thread
http://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php?topic=715629.0

Cando





Title: Re: Geelong 1856-58
Post by: akissling on Monday 23 March 15 14:09 GMT (UK)
Hi Cando and Judb,
Thanks so much for this information! The passenger list is a great find. Yes, you have the family correct. They immigrated to Canada, then Wisconsin and finally to California. James was married before so it is an interesting idea that he may have taken one of the children from his first marriage to Australia. I do know that Ellen and James had a child named Emily who may have been born in Australia (c1857) but it is also possible that she was born in California. Cando you found information on James that took me a long time to piece together :) I will check out some of the links that you both sent as well. Thanks for giving my research on the family an extra push!! This is so helpful!
Title: Re: Geelong 1856-58
Post by: akissling on Monday 23 March 15 23:10 GMT (UK)
When I look at the Public Record office I under the heading children it says 005. Would you think that mean 5 children came with him?
Title: Re: Geelong 1856-58
Post by: Nova67 on Monday 23 March 15 23:24 GMT (UK)

I don't think it means that as says CHILD born 1858:

Victoria outward passenger lists 1852-1915 Transcription
First name(s)
Children With

Last name
Stanaway

Age
Child

Birth year
1858

Departure year
1858

Departure month
Mar

Destination
San Francisco, United States

Ship name
Lucy L Hale

Ship's master
Lull William

State
Victoria

Record set
Victoria outward passenger lists 1852-1915

Category
Travel & migration

Subcategory
Passenger lists

Collections from
Australasia



Passenger list  transcription from genealogical site FIND MY PAST.
Title: Re: Geelong 1856-58
Post by: Nova67 on Monday 23 March 15 23:32 GMT (UK)
Hi Cando and Judb,
Thanks so much for this information! The passenger list is a great find. Yes, you have the family correct. They immigrated to Canada, then Wisconsin and finally to California. James was married before so it is an interesting idea that he may have taken one of the children from his first marriage to Australia. I do know that Ellen and James had a child named Emily who may have been born in Australia (c1857) but it is also possible that she was born in California. Cando you found information on James that took me a long time to piece together :) I will check out some of the links that you both sent as well. Thanks for giving my research on the family an extra push!! This is so helpful!

Re the Emily that died. In the birth/death index, as previously mentioned, just gives the state of Victoria rather than the district the event occurs in:

Name:
Ellen Elizabeth Stanaway

Father's name:
James Stanaway

Mother's name:
Ellen Prescott

Birth Place:
Victoria, Victoria

Registration Year:
1857

Registration Place:
Victoria

Registration Number:
10962


Name:
Ellen Elizabeth Stanaway

Birth Year:
abt 1857

Age:
6 Months

Death Place:
Victoria

Father's name:
James

Mother's name:
Ellen Prescott

Registration Year:
1858

Registration Place:
Victoria

Registration Number:
1157

I suppose another child could have been born in Victoria shortly before their departure for the United States and is not therefore registered?


Title: Re: Geelong 1856-58
Post by: Nova67 on Monday 23 March 15 23:39 GMT (UK)
Or maybe I am wrong?  What do other's think.  I do not know what 005 means either?
Title: Re: Geelong 1856-58
Post by: akissling on Monday 23 March 15 23:42 GMT (UK)
Thanks Nova67 on both comments. It might be worth it for me to purchase the death certificate so that I can at least place the family. I think you are also right that another child could have been born just before and not registered. Thanks again for the help!
Title: Re: Geelong 1856-58
Post by: akissling on Monday 23 March 15 23:46 GMT (UK)
I think you are probably right, because your transcription is much more specific. If there were 5 children listed I would think there would be four more entries with blank first names. He did have at least that many surviving children with his first wife but with his siblings still in the US he could have just as easily left them with his sisters in California. It is interesting that he left for at least a few years because he became a US citizen in 1852.
Title: Re: Geelong 1856-58
Post by: cando on Tuesday 24 March 15 00:21 GMT (UK)
One child on the manifest and the online subscription only websites have transcribed the information from the Public Records Office of Victoria.  I think it's best to only use the PROV indexes and they are free to access.

Transcribed from my resource - not an online website :-X

Birth
STANAWAY Ellen Elizabeth
Father James  Mother Ellen PRESCOTT
At Geelong  1857  Reg#10962

The Deaths index in this era only show the place of birth not the place of death.  Civil Registration commenced in Jul 1853 in the Colony of Victoria.  The certificate would have her place of death and place of burial although a couple of my deceased ancestors did not have their place of burial noted for deaths in Aug 1853 and Dec 1858.

Death
STANAWAY Ellen Elizabeth
Father James  Mother Ellen PRESCOTT
1858  6 months Born Geelong  Reg#1157

Geelong Cemetery records date back to 1839 and nothing on their database for Ellen therefore I think she died elsewhere in Victoria and if so would indicate that James did not spend all his time in Victoria in Geelong.

Cando

Title: Re: Geelong 1856-58
Post by: akissling on Tuesday 24 March 15 00:43 GMT (UK)
Thanks for the tip on death certificates! It is interesting that they didn't list where they died. It looks like I could see the original passenger list on microfiche at the PRO which is nice. I had a look to see if they have a pay service but couldn't see anything. Do you know if they have that service?
Title: Re: Geelong 1856-58
Post by: akissling on Tuesday 24 March 15 00:45 GMT (UK)
Never mind! I think I see where I can order a scan. Thanks anyway!
Title: Re: Geelong 1856-58
Post by: cando on Tuesday 24 March 15 01:04 GMT (UK)
Quote
Thanks for the tip on death certificates! It is interesting that they didn't list where they died.

I didn't write that....I wrote
Quote
The Deaths index in this era only show the place of birth not the place of death.  Civil Registration commenced in Jul 1853 in the Colony of Victoria.  The certificate would have her place of death and place of burial although a couple of my deceased ancestors did not have their place of burial noted for deaths in Aug 1853 and Dec 1858.

There are only three registrations for the name STANAWAY in Victoria to 1888 and they are James and Ellen's marriage and birth and death of Ellen Elizabeth.

James STANAWAY a defendant in £10 Cause lists 1855 Melbourne
http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article4811341

It is possible that James arrived in Victoria on a cargo ship from California.  It wasn't until 1852 that Unassisted Immigrants were required to be recorded.  I can't remember all the legislative details.

May I gently remind you we are required to transcribe all information from other websites.  It isn't the information that is copyrighted it is the format/presentation.  I link the page with the information as well as transcribing.

Cando
Title: Re: Geelong 1856-58
Post by: akissling on Tuesday 24 March 15 12:08 GMT (UK)
Thanks for the reminder. I will check out the other leads. I also get the difference now between the index and the actual certificates. Thanks again.
Title: Re: Geelong 1856-58
Post by: akissling on Tuesday 24 March 15 17:02 GMT (UK)
Found a birth announcement "On the 6th inst., Mrs. James Stanway, Sturt-street, Adelaide, of a daughter. 7 SEP 1857 in the South Australian Register. If this is them they sure got around but might explain why the death isn't in Geelong.
Title: Re: Geelong 1856-58
Post by: Spike H on Tuesday 24 March 15 20:29 GMT (UK)
It doesnt look like them.
The Mrs James Stanway in SA is a Mary Grace (Stephens), the daughter Annie born 6 Sep 1857 (ADE 11/124).
Title: Re: Geelong 1856-58
Post by: majm on Tuesday 24 March 15 22:38 GMT (UK)
That couple,  (Mr & Mrs James STANWAY) were in South Australia for many years, with babies born throughout the 1860s and into the 1870s ....

Mary Grace STANWAY died in 1875.   

The baby born in 1857 sadly succumbed the same year.  :(  :'(

http://www.genealogysa.org.au/resources/online-databases.html

Cheers,  JM
Title: Re: Geelong 1856-58
Post by: akissling on Friday 27 March 15 00:46 GMT (UK)
Thanks Spike and majam. It looks like my James Stanaway was only in Victoria and left from there in 1858. I have emailed the PRV to see if there is any significance in 005 under the field for a child's name. I will let you know when they respond in case anyone else has the same question. Thanks again.
http://prov.vic.gov.au/search_results?searchid=42&format=freetext&FamilyName=Stanaway&GivenName=&Ship=&Destination=&Month=0&Monthto=0&Year=0&Yearto=0&SearchSortField1=&SearchRecords=25&x=0&y=0