RootsChat.Com

England (Counties as in 1851-1901) => England => Shropshire => Topic started by: artisann on Friday 15 April 16 16:21 BST (UK)

Title: Have I got the correct family
Post by: artisann on Friday 15 April 16 16:21 BST (UK)
Wondering if anyone can help.
Edith A Haycock born abt 1894, Edith married a Walter Wallace in 1925 in Bristol, and fathers name is showed as James Haycock. I have found what I think is Edith on familysearch.org 1901 aged 7 yrs visiting grandparents... John and Harriet Haycock, is there anyway I can confirm I have the right Edith?....I can't access full 1901 census. And would like to confirm that this is James Haycocks parents.
Many thanks in advance for reading.
Just modifying Event Place: Much Wenlock Shropshire  :)
Title: Re: Have I got the correct family
Post by: ..claire.. on Friday 15 April 16 16:49 BST (UK)
Hi

Here is the transcription of the 1901

Much Wenlock

John Haycock hd mar 50  Carpenter   bn Baschurch Shrops.
Harriett          wf     "   46                       " Much Wenlock
Samuel         son        16 Apprentice Carpenter
Edith E          dau        14
Mary E             "          12
William J       son        10
Albert E          "            4
George S    Grandson 7
Edith    A    Grandaughter 7     All children born Much Wenlock

Class: RG13; Piece: 2530; Folio: 14; Page: 20

claire
Title: Re: Have I got the correct family
Post by: groom on Friday 15 April 16 16:53 BST (UK)

Going back to 1881, there is no James listed as a son, you would expect him to be there then.

RG11; Piece: 2640; Folio: 14; Page: 20

John Haycock           29
Harriet E. Haycock   27
Elizabeth R. Haycock   6
Martha E. Haycock   4
Harriet F. Haycock   1
John Bennett         23  lodger
Mary Bennett         22  lodger
Annie B. Bennett   
Title: Re: Have I got the correct family
Post by: artisann on Friday 15 April 16 16:56 BST (UK)
Hi Claire
Thank you so much for doing the look up...that's fits nicely as Edith's fathers profession is carpenter...(James Haycock).... Just need to find him now  :).
Many thanks again Claire
Title: Re: Have I got the correct family
Post by: artisann on Friday 15 April 16 17:01 BST (UK)
Hi groom
Thanks so much for taking the time to look up 1881 census...well I would have though he would have shown?....mmmm
Just love these puzzles   ;D
Title: Re: Have I got the correct family
Post by: ..claire.. on Friday 15 April 16 17:02 BST (UK)
Hi

SNAP ~ groom

I can't see this family with a son JAMES in any other census, although he could have been elsewhere.

 1891 does show a James aged 7months but in 1901 I think he could well be the 'William J' aged 10,  in the same household as Edith A aged 7.  ???

claire
Title: Re: Have I got the correct family
Post by: groom on Friday 15 April 16 17:09 BST (UK)
If Edith was born 1894, you would expect her father to be born around 1874 or perhaps earlier.
Title: Re: Have I got the correct family
Post by: artisann on Friday 15 April 16 17:09 BST (UK)
Hi again Claire
Mmmmmm but not old enough to be Edith's father?  ;D
Title: Re: Have I got the correct family
Post by: rosie99 on Friday 15 April 16 17:10 BST (UK)
Do you have Edith in 1939 as that may give a clue as to her date of birth, or her death registration
Title: Re: Have I got the correct family
Post by: artisann on Friday 15 April 16 17:11 BST (UK)
Sorry groom our posts crossed
Title: Re: Have I got the correct family
Post by: artisann on Friday 15 April 16 17:12 BST (UK)
Sorry groom our posts crossed
Title: Re: Have I got the correct family
Post by: ..claire.. on Friday 15 April 16 17:15 BST (UK)

I can't readily see a birth registration either ???

claire
Title: Re: Have I got the correct family
Post by: keyboard86 on Friday 15 April 16 17:15 BST (UK)
Hi the George T Haycock shown on 1901, could well be the baptism of a George Thomas Haycock 20th October 1893 Much Wenlock Mother Elizabeth Rebecca?
Keyboard86
Title: Re: Have I got the correct family
Post by: artisann on Friday 15 April 16 17:15 BST (UK)
Sorry having a bit of trouble posting today..last message went twice.
Edith's age  on marriage cert in 1925 says she was 30 yrs of age. So est 1894/95.
Title: Re: Have I got the correct family
Post by: groom on Friday 15 April 16 17:16 BST (UK)
Of course, the fact that she is with grandparents could mean that she was illegitimate and a name was added to her marriage certificate for respectability, and she gave her grandfather's occupation.
Title: Re: Have I got the correct family
Post by: ..claire.. on Friday 15 April 16 17:19 BST (UK)

That looks good Keyboard  :)

George T is listed as 'son' of John and Harriet in the last available census

claire
Title: Re: Have I got the correct family
Post by: artisann on Friday 15 April 16 17:20 BST (UK)
Quite possible groom...so are you thinking like me I have the correct family so far ...well apart from James who is mentioned on the marriage cert  :)
Title: Re: Have I got the correct family
Post by: artisann on Friday 15 April 16 17:25 BST (UK)
Hi Claire George T is listed as grand son in 1901...  :)

Title: Re: Have I got the correct family
Post by: keyboard86 on Friday 15 April 16 19:16 BST (UK)
Hi again, if the Elizabeth R b c 1875 in 1881 is the one who at least had an illegitimate son George Thomas Haycock,  then her baptism was:-

Elizabeth Rebecca Haycock 27th September 1874 Much Wenlock Father John occ Carpenter Mother Harriet

She married an Alfred James Bagley,  this looks to be her in 1901 census :-

James Alfred Bagley 27 b Broseley
Elizabeth Rebecca 26 b Much Wenlock
Ethel Gertrude 4 b Manchester
Harriet Mary 3 b Manchester
Gladys May 0 b Manchester
Residing Grosvenor Street, Prestwich, Manchester
Census ref RG13/3769/125/27

In 1891 she is Rebecca Haycock aged 16 b Much Wenlock
Census ref RG12/2101/11/16
Keyboard86
Title: Re: Have I got the correct family
Post by: groom on Friday 15 April 16 19:31 BST (UK)
That could explain why Edith and George were with grandparents in 1901 - possibly there as their mother had just had a baby. We don't know that they were actually living there, just that they were there on census night.


Quote
James Alfred Bagley 27 b Broseley       

Could that be where the James on the marriage certificate came from? Not her biological father, but the man who brought her up?
Title: Re: Have I got the correct family
Post by: artisann on Friday 15 April 16 19:32 BST (UK)
Hi Keyboard
thank you so much for looking that info up and replying....just shows how much digging has to be done ;D....
Many thanks again though for digging :)
Title: Re: Have I got the correct family
Post by: artisann on Friday 15 April 16 19:37 BST (UK)
Hi groom
well its all fitting together...so am thinking Elizabeth is Ediths mother too?....hope I have got this correct
Many thanks again Groom :)
Title: Re: Have I got the correct family
Post by: keyboard86 on Friday 15 April 16 19:43 BST (UK)
Hi groom
well its all fitting together...so am thinking Elizabeth is Ediths mother too?....hope I have got this correct
Many thanks again Groom :)

 ;D I am also thinking Elizabeth Rebecca is the mother of Edith, only problem is at present no baptism like George Thomas ( As a matter of interest was held privately)  or a nailed on birth registration on Freebmd?
Keyboard86
Title: Re: Have I got the correct family
Post by: artisann on Friday 15 April 16 19:50 BST (UK)
Keyboard
Once again thank you for the info... ;)
Title: Re: Have I got the correct family
Post by: keyboard86 on Friday 15 April 16 19:55 BST (UK)
 ;D Hi from your PM. ( Should have been really posted so all can see)! " Held privately " I would suggest was only in the presence of Elizabeth and the cleric carrying out the baptism,  in the case of both Edith & Elizabeth in Madeley births,  cannot locate with full name?
Keyboard86
Title: Re: Have I got the correct family
Post by: artisann on Friday 15 April 16 20:02 BST (UK)
Thanks so much Keyboard for explaining ...learn things everyday  ;D
and once again thanks for all your help :)
Title: Re: Have I got the correct family
Post by: artisann on Friday 15 April 16 20:10 BST (UK)
Keyboard could I ask if its possible that Edith and Thomas could be twins as they are both aged 7yrs on the 1901. ???
Title: Re: Have I got the correct family
Post by: groom on Friday 15 April 16 20:15 BST (UK)
Doesn't a baptism held privately sometimes mean at home, straight after the birth as the child wasn't expected to live? It seems a bit strange though, that if they were twins, they weren't both baptised at the same time, and also why, if George's birth was registered, why wasn't Edith?
Title: Re: Have I got the correct family
Post by: groom on Friday 15 April 16 20:19 BST (UK)
I wonder if Edith wasn't Elizabeth's daughter, but was the daughter of her younger sister, Martha, so making her and George cousins not siblings? 
Title: Re: Have I got the correct family
Post by: artisann on Friday 15 April 16 20:19 BST (UK)
That's a point groom  ::)....that's if correct age was given on the census ::)
Title: Re: Have I got the correct family
Post by: artisann on Friday 15 April 16 20:21 BST (UK)
 Could be cousins ;D ;D back digging again ;D
Title: Re: Have I got the correct family
Post by: keyboard86 on Friday 15 April 16 20:40 BST (UK)
Hi if Martha Ellen Haycock baptism 24th September 1876 Much Wenlock Father John occ Carpenter Mother Harriet is the mother of Edith, she marries a William Martin December qtr 1900 Prestwich 8d 642 Residing Rectory View, Prestwich in 1901
Census ref RG13/3778/130/36
Keyboard86

PS on the same page as George Thomas Haycock baptism there were at least 3 more for some reason "Held Privately"  none a single women!
Title: Re: Have I got the correct family
Post by: artisann on Friday 15 April 16 20:44 BST (UK)
Hi Keyboard
Thank you so much once again...going to be fun trying to sort this out ;D
Title: Re: Have I got the correct family
Post by: keyboard86 on Friday 15 April 16 21:14 BST (UK)
 :) Hi again. have you found Edith in 1911 census, and when was her death?
Keyboard86
Title: Re: Have I got the correct family
Post by: keyboard86 on Friday 15 April 16 21:22 BST (UK)
Hi was her death also where both candidates for her birth were in later returns/marriage :-

Edith Annie Wallace born 25th January 1894 Death March 1979 Manchester aged 85?
Keyboard86

So can you find her in 1911/1939?
Keyboard86
Title: Re: Have I got the correct family
Post by: artisann on Friday 15 April 16 21:31 BST (UK)
Hi Again Keyboard
in 1925 when she married the address on cert is Henleaze Gardens, Henleaze, Bristol. and yes that's the correct death :)
Title: Re: Have I got the correct family
Post by: keyboard86 on Saturday 16 April 16 00:08 BST (UK)
Hi was her death also where both candidates for her birth were in later returns/marriage :-

Edith Annie Wallace born 25th January 1894 Death March 1979 Manchester aged 85?

Hi again,  so can you find her 1911/1939 or even birth registration?
Keyboard86
Title: Re: Have I got the correct family
Post by: artisann on Saturday 16 April 16 01:27 BST (UK)
Sorry keyboard I don't have access to the 1911 census ... :)
Title: Re: Have I got the correct family
Post by: keyboard86 on Saturday 16 April 16 01:33 BST (UK)
OK did Edith A have a child prior to marriage?
Keyboard86
Title: Re: Have I got the correct family
Post by: artisann on Saturday 16 April 16 01:35 BST (UK)
Hi again ..she did but I only am aware of his name ...no dob or where he was born ....
Title: Re: Have I got the correct family
Post by: artisann on Saturday 16 April 16 01:38 BST (UK)
Hi again
Unsure of any living rellies with regard to last post so really can't say any more  :)
Title: Re: Have I got the correct family
Post by: Hunt4relatives on Wednesday 29 June 16 21:50 BST (UK)
Hi. Mary Eliza Haycock born 1888 from Much Wenlock was my Grandma. Jim was her brother. I think another reply you received was correct......James was his 2nd name.  My Grandma only ever referred to join as Jim. In his later years he bacame Mayor of Pontypridd in Wales. Their brother Albert sadly died in WW1 when on a minesweeper.
My Grandma died in 1988 just short of her 100th birthday.  When she died I took some of her photos so know a little bit of history.....and from stories she told me. I don't have much information of other members of the family. Happy to answer what queries you may have.
Title: Re: Have I got the correct family
Post by: Hunt4relatives on Wednesday 29 June 16 22:03 BST (UK)
Further to my last post, Edith was my Grandma's (Mary Elsa Haycock) favourite sites. Edith used to come and girl my Grandma at her home in Cheetham Hill in Manchester. I met Aunty Edith on a few occasions. Once in around 1967 she went for a walk to the shops in Cheetham Hill and my Grandma sent me out to find her; I think I was 10 yrs old. When I knew Aunty Edith I'm not sure how old she was but I think she could have been about 80 yrs old. She was very smiley. I'm not sure but I think I may have a photo of her.
Hope this into helps/is of interest. I do know some of the history of the family. I know the Hancock children were all born in Sheinton Street ( or road ) in Much Wenlock.
Title: Re: Have I got the correct family
Post by: Hunt4relatives on Wednesday 29 June 16 22:06 BST (UK)
Sorry for spelling errors in last post..... predictive text.
I meant all the Haycock children were born in Sheinton Street.
And it should have said Edith came to visit my Grandma in Cheetham Hill. Hope the rest makes sense.
Title: Re: Have I got the correct family
Post by: artisann on Wednesday 29 June 16 22:12 BST (UK)
Hi Hunt4
 Have sent you a pm  :)