RootsChat.Com

Beginners => Family History Beginners Board => Topic started by: toby webb on Monday 13 August 18 11:49 BST (UK)

Title: HO 107 etc
Post by: toby webb on Monday 13 August 18 11:49 BST (UK)
We now have 2 instances where people trying to help us find something quote e.g.
" see HO107 1861 429 p5".
We would be pleased to know how to go about opening that page on Ancestry.
Thanks, T & daughter.
Title: Re: HO 107 etc
Post by: hallmark on Monday 13 August 18 11:55 BST (UK)
Buy a Subscription?   ;D
Title: Re: HO 107 etc
Post by: rosie99 on Monday 13 August 18 11:57 BST (UK)
From this link you can select the year the census was taken (Included data collections:)
https://search.ancestry.co.uk/search/group/ukicen

Having selected and clicked year/England etc at the bottom of the page you are asked for Piece - Folio and page

The instance you have given is
1851 (H0107)
Piece no 1861
folio 429
page 5


ADDED - If you have selected the year as I suggested it will not ask for the first bit of the reference quoted as it relates to the census year

1841 - H0107 (reference will also give a book number)
1851 - H0107
1861 - RG9
1871 - RG10
1881 - RG11
1891 - RG12
1901 - RG13
1911 - RG14

Hope that makes sense


Title: Re: HO 107 etc
Post by: toby webb on Monday 13 August 18 12:38 BST (UK)
Thanks rosie99. I am feeling a bit 'two plankish' for when I add piece, folio & page - exactly in each case, up comes
"Your search returned zero good matches." Is there someting else? T
Title: Re: HO 107 etc
Post by: rosie99 on Monday 13 August 18 12:48 BST (UK)
Is your family in Great Gaddesden, Hertfordshire

I have just used the 1851 page and only putting in the numbers and got results
1851
https://search.ancestry.co.uk/search/db.aspx?dbid=8860

Title: Re: HO 107 etc
Post by: toby webb on Monday 13 August 18 12:59 BST (UK)
No.
Joseph Cleall 39 dairyman born S. Perrott was living at Symondsbury, Dorset.
If you get Great Gaddesden then I feel that the information given me on Dorset RootsChat is suspect.
Back to the drawing board, but very many thanks for your trouble. T
Title: Re: HO 107 etc
Post by: rosie99 on Monday 13 August 18 13:06 BST (UK)
Try this
https://search.ancestry.co.uk/cgi-bin/sse.dll?db=uki1851&indiv=try&h=5597645
Title: Re: HO 107 etc
Post by: JenB on Monday 13 August 18 13:09 BST (UK)
Is your family in Great Gaddesden, Hertfordshire

I have just used the 1851 page and only putting in the numbers and got results
1851
https://search.ancestry.co.uk/search/db.aspx?dbid=8860

Using reference HO 107 / 1861/ 429/ 5 on FindMyPast takes me to entries in Symondsbury in Dorset. This was the reference given by nanny jan on your Dorset thread earlier today.
Title: Re: HO 107 etc
Post by: rosie99 on Monday 13 August 18 13:14 BST (UK)
It is Ancestry Jen  ::)   

I have just tried again and put that reference in on Anc and nothing else and the image it takes me to is H0107 /1715
Title: Re: HO 107 etc
Post by: Gadget on Monday 13 August 18 13:25 BST (UK)
Using the info that the OP has given in Reply #5 , the ref from Ancestry is Piece 1860 Folio 117 Page 5

Added - image gives that info too.

But living in South Perrott
Title: Re: HO 107 etc
Post by: Gadget on Monday 13 August 18 13:34 BST (UK)
Sorry - wrong Joseph Cleall. I know there's a reason for not using Ancestry!!!
Title: Re: HO 107 etc
Post by: rosie99 on Monday 13 August 18 13:35 BST (UK)
My head hurts  ::)   ;D

Hopefully OP will let us know if we are right

From the other thread so not the one I found

1851 has a Joseph Cleall (b 1812) with wife Fanny and three children at Vearse (?), Symondsbury.


HO107, piece 1861, folio 429, pg 5.   Image just shows "Parish of Symondsbury".
Title: Re: HO 107 etc
Post by: JenB on Monday 13 August 18 13:39 BST (UK)
I cannot find Symondsbury Parish on the 1851 on Ancestry. It doesn't appear in the drop-down list of parishes on the right-hand side of the page.
Title: Re: HO 107 etc
Post by: Gadget on Monday 13 August 18 13:44 BST (UK)
Just been doing the same search, Jennifer, with the same result.

I also tried the daughter, Elizabeth, without a surname but nothing came up for her either.

Think it's one of Ancestry's missing pieces  :-\
Title: Re: HO 107 etc
Post by: JenB on Monday 13 August 18 13:45 BST (UK)
Think it's one of Ancestry's missing pieces  :-\

I agree, I've tried searching for several other people on other pages and can't find any of them.

It ain't there  ;D  But it definitely exists because it's there loud and clear on FindMyPast.

I feel that the information given me on Dorset RootsChat is suspect.

No, the information you've been given here
http://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php?topic=798476.msg6557211#msg6557211 is absolutely correct. However, it doesn't seem to exist on Ancestry.
Title: Re: HO 107 etc
Post by: Gadget on Monday 13 August 18 13:46 BST (UK)
Family Search

https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:SG2K-1LH
Title: Re: HO 107 etc
Post by: JenB on Monday 13 August 18 13:51 BST (UK)
Family Search

https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:SG2K-1LH

Apparently already found by Toby Webb http://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php?topic=798476.msg6557164#msg6557164
Title: Re: HO 107 etc
Post by: stanmapstone on Monday 13 August 18 13:52 BST (UK)
In Ancestry Piece 1861 only goes up to Folio 303 Page 35.

Stan
Title: Re: HO 107 etc
Post by: Gadget on Monday 13 August 18 13:53 BST (UK)
Family Search

https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:SG2K-1LH

Complete with the correct reference.

 :D

I've added the ref on the other thread, just in case.
Title: Re: HO 107 etc
Post by: Gadget on Monday 13 August 18 13:54 BST (UK)
Sorry - double post.
Title: Re: HO 107 etc
Post by: LizzieL on Monday 13 August 18 14:11 BST (UK)
Just been doing the same search, Jennifer, with the same result.

I also tried the daughter, Elizabeth, without a surname but nothing came up for her either.

Think it's one of Ancestry's missing pieces  :-\

I've come across that a number of times - Ancestry has missing pages or a whole missing village when FindMyPast has the records - and sometimes the other way round.
There are also some records which neither have because they got lost or damaged in the distant past
Title: Re: HO 107 etc
Post by: toby webb on Monday 13 August 18 14:45 BST (UK)
Sorry to stir up a hornet's nest. Not all bad however. At least I now know how to use HO107 etc. T