RootsChat.Com

England (Counties as in 1851-1901) => England => Lancashire => Topic started by: northern_rose on Sunday 13 January 19 22:20 GMT (UK)

Title: Brian Robert Martin after 1946
Post by: northern_rose on Sunday 13 January 19 22:20 GMT (UK)
Trying to trace Brian Robert Martin after 1946. Born 12 Feb 1917 in Blackburn.

In 1939 he was a policeman in Nelson. He married and then had a son but disappeared in c1946.

Waiting to hear back from LRO about his police records, website shows he served 1937-1946.

I can find a possible death in Preston in 2011 but the registration doesn’t give exact DOB.

Anyone any other ideas where to look?
Title: Re: Brian Robert Martin after 1946
Post by: CaroleW on Sunday 13 January 19 22:39 GMT (UK)
There is no other birth for that name between 1917-1919 so I think he is the one you are looking for
Title: Re: Brian Robert Martin after 1946
Post by: rosie99 on Monday 14 January 19 11:56 GMT (UK)
He should appear in online electoral registers probably until 2012. There is a possible match in Preston
Title: Re: Brian Robert Martin after 1946
Post by: northern_rose on Monday 14 January 19 18:46 GMT (UK)
He should appear in online electoral registers probably until 2012. There is a possible match in Preston

I'm not sure where to look for the 2011 electoral role - where are you looking?

On Ancestry I can see a possible in 2003-4 in Great Harwood and then in Preston at 1 East Cliff in 2005-7.
Title: Re: Brian Robert Martin after 1946
Post by: CaroleW on Monday 14 January 19 21:13 GMT (UK)
www.192.com is one of several sites with the 2011 electoral register. 
Title: Re: Brian Robert Martin after 1946
Post by: willyam on Monday 14 January 19 22:29 GMT (UK)
There is in FindMyPast an item headed "Preston Decrees" in the Lancashire Evening Post issue of 21st October 1954 which reports that:

"At Preston Divorce Court, today Mr Commissioner Maddocks granted a decree nisi, in [an] undefended case, to Brian Robert Martin, Lowthorpe Road Preston, desertion by Mary Martin"

Also in FindMyPast is a detailed report, from the Nelson Leader of 10th October 1941 of their marriage on 4th October at St Mary's Church in Nelson.

Willyam
Title: Re: Brian Robert Martin after 1946
Post by: lancs-lassie on Monday 14 January 19 22:39 GMT (UK)
Slightly off topic...
I have a sub with Ancestry but not sure how to locate electoral registers as is mentioned in a previous reply. Can anyone enlighten me please?
Many thanks, Lancs lassie
Title: Re: Brian Robert Martin after 1946
Post by: CaroleW on Monday 14 January 19 23:00 GMT (UK)
On the Ancestry home page select Search.  Then select Card Catalogue.   In Title input Electoral registers
Title: Re: Brian Robert Martin after 1946
Post by: northern_rose on Tuesday 15 January 19 18:50 GMT (UK)
There is in FindMyPast an item headed "Preston Decrees" in the Lancashire Evening Post issue of 21st October 1954 which reports that:

"At Preston Divorce Court, today Mr Commissioner Maddocks granted a decree nisi, in [an] undefended case, to Brian Robert Martin, Lowthorpe Road Preston, desertion by Mary Martin"

Also in FindMyPast is a detailed report, from the Nelson Leader of 10th October 1941 of their marriage on 4th October at St Mary's Church in Nelson.

Willyam

Thank you so much for this - the divorce is something I didn't have. My subs on FindMyPast doesn't give me access to newspapers. Can you tell me is there is any more details on the divorce? If there are I will go and access at the library or Lancs record Office. My friend believed her grandfather left her grandmother but this reads that Mary left Brian - am I reading that correct???
Title: Re: Brian Robert Martin after 1946
Post by: CaroleW on Tuesday 15 January 19 20:46 GMT (UK)
Reply 5 makes it clear that Brian was granted a divorce on the grounds of his wife’s desertion  and she did not contest the divorce
Title: Re: Brian Robert Martin after 1946
Post by: northern_rose on Tuesday 15 January 19 20:48 GMT (UK)
Reply 5 makes it clear that Brian was granted a divorce on the grounds of his wife’s desertion  and she did not contest the divorce
thanks that's how I read it but that is the exact opposite of the story told in the family - just needed it confirmed that I read it correct!