RootsChat.Com

General => The Common Room => The Lighter Side => Topic started by: mckha489 on Saturday 02 February 19 09:28 GMT (UK)

Title: Too many names for the vicar
Post by: mckha489 on Saturday 02 February 19 09:28 GMT (UK)
While looking at 1826 Westminster baptisms came across this entry

Napoleon James Russell Frederick Alexander son of James and Sarah Inch Ender Russell

Vicar has noted “in consequence of the father being so absurd as to give his child so many [names] the register could not be entered in the regular way.

There are two words at the end underlined with little + signs, can anyone see what they are (just out of interest)  Joshua Quinton???
Title: Re: Too many names for the vicar
Post by: Rhododendron on Saturday 02 February 19 09:36 GMT (UK)
Love it!!
Title: Re: Too many names for the vicar
Post by: macwil on Saturday 02 February 19 09:46 GMT (UK)
::)  ;D
Title: Re: Too many names for the vicar
Post by: Wiggy on Saturday 02 February 19 09:57 GMT (UK)
Love it!!

Me too!!  ;D  ;D

Can't read the missing bit though.

Wiggy
Title: Re: Too many names for the vicar
Post by: Yorkslass on Saturday 02 February 19 11:08 GMT (UK)
Could it be an abbreviation of "Christian" - xistian …. ?  ???

Yorkslass
Title: Re: Too many names for the vicar
Post by: arthurk on Saturday 02 February 19 11:18 GMT (UK)
I agree with Yorkslass that the upper (underlined) one may be Xstian, for Christian, and I think the + is to indicate that the word below clarifies or amends this. Could that be parents?

I'm actually a little bit confused as to some of the other names and initials. Is the surname Inch Ender Russell, or are some of these the mother's middle names?

The clergy are also a bit puzzling. From looking at the whole page at FindMyPast (it's St James, Westminster) and the Clergy Database, they appear to be Peter Felix and Gerrard Thomas Andrewes (initials GTH in this note), yet there's no record in the Clergy Database that either of them was appointed to St James.
Title: Re: Too many names for the vicar
Post by: Treetotal on Saturday 02 February 19 23:05 GMT (UK)
I like that  ;D
Carol
Title: Re: Too many names for the vicar
Post by: Kiltpin on Saturday 02 February 19 23:33 GMT (UK)
I don't think that that is an X, but rather a +. Our last vicar in the village used to sign his name "Wiffle +". 

Regards 

Chas
Title: Re: Too many names for the vicar
Post by: heywood on Sunday 03 February 19 00:03 GMT (UK)
I don’t know about the + but I think it might say Xstian names.
Title: Re: Too many names for the vicar
Post by: Wiggy on Sunday 03 February 19 01:10 GMT (UK)
I don’t know about the + but I think it might say Xstian names.


Think you are right Heywood.    :)

Wiggy
Title: Re: Too many names for the vicar
Post by: mckha489 on Sunday 03 February 19 01:20 GMT (UK)
Yes i agree it’s a + then X written two Cs back to back eg )(stian.    NO idea what the other word is though. Except that it does appear to start with a Q

Have now got completely sidetracked by him...

James RUSSELL’s partnership with Godfrey Bingley WADSWORTH (surgeons Broad Street, Golden Square was dissolved 1 July 1843.  He’s at the Broad street address at the baptism and also in newspapers in the 1830s

1841 he’s 45 with an assumed wife a Hannah age 30
 James was born Ireland
 O children

1851 20 Grove End Road, Marylebone he is a retired Surgeon age 55  Born Ireland
Hannah and her two sisters and a niece.

So it would seem Sarah Inch Ender and Napoleon of the absurd number of names both died? But I cannot see the burials so far.
Title: Re: Too many names for the vicar
Post by: Melbell on Sunday 03 February 19 18:49 GMT (UK)
This is a quote from arthurk's post: "The clergy are also a bit puzzling. From looking at the whole page at FindMyPast (it's St James, Westminster) and the Clergy Database, they appear to be Peter Felix and Gerrard Thomas Andrewes (initials GTH in this note), yet there's no record in the Clergy Database that either of them was appointed to St James".
[/quote]

CofE clergy can perform marriages in churches other than 'their own', so no mystery there!

Melbell
Title: Re: Too many names for the vicar
Post by: arthurk on Sunday 03 February 19 19:03 GMT (UK)
"... there's no record in the Clergy Database that either of them was appointed to St James".

CofE clergy can perform marriages in churches other than 'their own', so no mystery there!

Except that this wasn't just a one-off - there were lots of entries signed by one or other of them, suggesting a longer-term association with the church. Moreover, the note about the multiplicity of names has the air of having been written by someone who is responsible for the church and its registers, rather than a visiting cleric.
Title: Re: Too many names for the vicar
Post by: heywood on Sunday 03 February 19 19:22 GMT (UK)
Gerrard Thomas Andrewes married at St James in 1819.

I am not familiar with the Clergy database but there are a few references to him here unless it is his father, perhaps?

http://db.theclergydatabase.org.uk/jsp/persons/DisplayCcePerson.jsp?PersonID=1548

He is living in the parish in 1841.
Title: Re: Too many names for the vicar
Post by: heywood on Sunday 03 February 19 19:24 GMT (UK)
I think that must be his father or a relative in the database (not the marriage or 1841j

https://www.grosvenorprints.com/stock_detail.php?ref=16374
Title: Re: Too many names for the vicar
Post by: arthurk on Sunday 03 February 19 19:39 GMT (UK)
I am not familiar with the Clergy database but there are a few references to him here unless it is his father, perhaps?

http://db.theclergydatabase.org.uk/jsp/persons/DisplayCcePerson.jsp?PersonID=1548

Yes - the one listed as just Gerrard Andrewes, who was Rector of St James, died in 1825, so can't have been doing baptisms in 1826.

I wonder - maybe as his father was getting old, GTA might have helped out (while holding appointments and living off tithes etc elsewhere), and even after a new rector had been appointed (John Giffard Ward, 24 Jun 1825), he carried on doing that. And maybe Peter Felix was doing the same kind of thing - London life must have been so much more agreeable than dealing with ag labs and other ordinary people out in the sticks.
Title: Re: Too many names for the vicar
Post by: ThrelfallYorky on Monday 04 February 19 15:11 GMT (UK)
Perhaps not quite to the point but : How do all those people who give their poor son the names of an entire football team manage?
Title: Re: Too many names for the vicar
Post by: Maiden Stone on Tuesday 05 February 19 00:27 GMT (UK)
So it would seem Sarah Inch Ender and Napoleon of the absurd number of names both died? But I cannot see the burials so far.
Perhaps Napoleon James Russell Frederick met Wellington Blucher Ainscough who was baptised on 7th July 1814 at St. Leonard, Walton-le-Dale, Lancashire and young Napoleon J. R. F., being outnumbered in the famous names department, came off worse in the encounter. I expect they met at a well-known railway station in London.
Title: Re: Too many names for the vicar
Post by: Rosinish on Tuesday 05 February 19 00:57 GMT (UK)
Perhaps not quite to the point but : How do all those people who give their poor son the names of an entire football team manage?

My daughter has a relative on her paternal side who has a child named after the whole of Glasgow Rangers Football Team (Scotland)!

I had to smile at the pun 'manage'  ;D

Annie
Title: Re: Too many names for the vicar
Post by: pinefamily on Tuesday 05 February 19 03:46 GMT (UK)
Interesting note from the officiating vicar. I've seen entries from titled folk who give their children multiple names, with not a word of complaint from the minister. Perhaps he thought the parents were getting above their station in life.
As for the Clergy Database, while it is a useful tool, it is riddled with errors and omissions. At least it is for the ancestors I've looked up.  ::)
Title: Re: Too many names for the vicar
Post by: Maiden Stone on Tuesday 05 February 19 04:33 GMT (UK)
Interesting note from the officiating vicar. I've seen entries from titled folk who give their children multiple names, with not a word of complaint from the minister. Perhaps he thought the parents were getting above their station in life.
Choice of Napoleon as first name on the list probably caused him to purse his lips or sniff disapprovingly. Parents either had republican or pro-French feelings.