RootsChat.Com

Ireland (Historical Counties) => Ireland => Topic started by: dusty2 on Wednesday 03 June 20 14:19 BST (UK)

Title: Correct form of surname
Post by: dusty2 on Wednesday 03 June 20 14:19 BST (UK)
I came across someone in a report named as Thomas Murphy or Mackereenah. This last name looks like an attempt to write what was heard, but what would the correct form of that surname be (if it is a surname)? Because of the first surname I have assumed that the second would be Irish. Any suggestions, please?
Title: Re: Correct form of surname
Post by: Maggsie on Wednesday 03 June 20 15:37 BST (UK)
Hi,
Where did you see this?
It may be a miss spelled townland name.
Maggsie
Title: Re: Correct form of surname
Post by: Milliepede on Wednesday 03 June 20 15:43 BST (UK)
Are you able to post a snippet for us to show what you are reading?
Title: Re: Correct form of surname
Post by: heywood on Wednesday 03 June 20 16:09 BST (UK)
I came across someone in a report named as Thomas Murphy or Mackereenah. This last name looks like an attempt to write what was heard, but what would the correct form of that surname be (if it is a surname)? Because of the first surname I have assumed that the second would be Irish. Any suggestions, please?

Here is the surname - O Murchadha (in modern Irish O Murchu) and Mac Murchadha

https://www.johngrenham.com/surnamescode/surnamehistory.php?surname=murphy&search_type=full

Maybe, as Maggsie says it is meant to be a place name.
Title: Re: Correct form of surname
Post by: dusty2 on Wednesday 03 June 20 16:57 BST (UK)
Thanks for the replies. I am collating various pieces of information about the inmates of Saltley Reformatory School in Birmingham. In the Admissions Register entry 95, in 1856, it gives the name of the boy as Thomas Murphy, with 'or Mackereenah' written below in even smaller print. Several of the inmates had alternartive names, and I assumed this was another. I attach an image of the name in the Admissions Register. Sorry, my original photo is not as high definition as I would have liked. As you can see, it is all hand-written, which can add its own difficulties!
Title: Re: Correct form of surname
Post by: gaffy on Wednesday 03 June 20 17:08 BST (UK)
Or could it be 'or Thomas [followed by something like Keenan]'?

I'm just guessing with alternative eyes...  :)
Title: Re: Correct form of surname
Post by: dusty2 on Wednesday 03 June 20 18:04 BST (UK)
That's an interesting idea. Looking at it closely, I don't think that the letter shapes below for your suggested Thomas match the above Thomas, but I wouldn't want to be too dogmatic about that.
Title: Re: Correct form of surname
Post by: josey on Wednesday 03 June 20 18:07 BST (UK)
Could it be Macksheenah? His mother & father may have had different surnames, or his mother have married a second time. The alternative names could be aliases used when offences were committed.

Can you tell us what other info is in that admission register  - does it give parent/guardian details or offence [might be able to find in newspaper]
Title: Re: Correct form of surname
Post by: dusty2 on Wednesday 03 June 20 18:46 BST (UK)
I appreciate the efforts that are being made here. A bit lengthy, but here is the full entry as I read it:

Date of Admission: 29 May 1857
By whom nominated: Committed by Magistrate, Liverpool, for 5 years
By whom recommended: -
Name: Thomas Murphy or ...
Age: 12
Number: 95
Education: Very little
Employment before committal: tailor
What trained for in Reformatory: tailor
When left the Institution: 30 March 1857
Parentage and family: Father dead; mother a washwoman
Residence: 58 Coppice Hill, Liverpool
Trade etc [of father, I think]: Tailor
With whom the boys are placed: Sent to Akbar Reformatory [a training ship moored in the Mersey] 30 March 1857

And that is everything.
Title: Re: Correct form of surname
Post by: josey on Wednesday 03 June 20 22:46 BST (UK)
Trying to look in 1851 census, cannot find Coppice Hill nor on a google search.....
Title: Re: Correct form of surname
Post by: heywood on Wednesday 03 June 20 23:23 BST (UK)
I thought it would likely be Copperas Hill.
Title: Re: Correct form of surname
Post by: dusty2 on Thursday 04 June 20 00:09 BST (UK)
It's a bit of a scrawl but there is an 'i' in there, so perhaps whoever filled in the Register or supplied the details hadn't heard of the word Copperas so put in what they thought it might be. Thanks for the suggestion.
Title: Re: Correct form of surname
Post by: dathai on Thursday 04 June 20 08:07 BST (UK)
http://www.rootschat.com/links/01pjl/
Title: Re: Correct form of surname
Post by: dusty2 on Thursday 04 June 20 09:17 BST (UK)
Well, well, it's good to have the address confirmed. I don't have time to check every detail (I'd never finish the task), so it's good to get confirmation. Thanks, dathai, and thank you to everybody else who offered suggestions - much appreciated.