RootsChat.Com
Census Lookups General Lookups => Census and Resource Discussion => Topic started by: bikermickau on Monday 19 July 21 05:01 BST (UK)
-
I was doing a search for mary l* Atkins England 1871 census (search terms). I get the above subject error message when I click on "Mary Le Atkins born 1858 Reddilch, Worcestershire to see the household index.
There is at least one other record where I get that same error. Albert L Atkins 1858 Great Yarmouth, Norfolk
With others on the 1st search page I can view the household index.
I contacted familysearch, the person who replied thinks I'm asking why I can't see the image. I've replied.
Any Ideas?
Mick
-
For Mary Le Atkins, I get this message:
"We're unable to show this record to you.
This record can only be displayed on certain accounts. FamilySearch must honor the agreements we have with our partners, record owners, and internal policies."
But I can see the next record in the list, Mary L W. Atkins. I've never seen that message before at FamilySearch but I mostly look at US records.
-
I think this is the one in 1871 - They were all born Redditch Living at Webheath Road, Webheath, Bromsgrove
William H Atkins Head 33 Needle Scourer? Worcestershire, England
Mary Atkins Wife 30 Worcestershire, England
Mary L Atkins Daughter 13 Worcestershire, England
Matilda Atkins Daughter 9 Worcestershire, England
Reuben Atkins Son 6 Worcestershire, England
Kay
Added - I get the same error message when searching for Reuben Atkins on Family Search
-
Thanks Erato and Kay99 for checking.
I was able to view the 1871 census index for Mary Le Atkins born 1858 Reddilch, Worcestershire on familysearch around 10 days ago or so.
1871 census on Ancestry the family surname is spelt Alkins. On viewing the image I see Atkins.
Class: RG10; Piece: 3076; Folio: 32; Page: 10 at Webheath, Worcestershire, England
I have some members of the family 1881
Class: RG11; Piece: 2943; Folio: 77; Page: 35 at Redditch, Worcestershire, England
I've not located them 1861 census
Mick
-
I take it you have access to Ancestry, Mick.
There are 3 other children besides those Kay lists. They are Jane, 4 yrs; William H 2yrs and Edward 2 months.
I got the same message from F S. I tried searching all Edwards born 1871, Worcestershire. Some work, some have the error message but then load and some are like your Edward - no access.
-
Here are Mary and Mary L in 1861 1932/90/34
They are in the household of John and Mary Jones and family
Mary Atkins married 21 yrs sister b Abergelly, Wales
Mary L, 3 yrs niece b Birmingham
-
Thanks Heywood for that 1861 reference,
I have free access to Ancestry library version online via my local library.
Here are Mary and Mary L in 1861 1932/90/34
They are in the household of John and Mary Jones and family
Mary Atkins married 21 yrs sister b Abergelly, Wales
Mary L, 3 yrs niece b Birmingham
-
In 1861 I think William is listed on Anc as William Adkins 27 b Redditch a Needle Scourer? although he is listed as unmarried? William was lodging at Evesham Street Redditch
Kay
-
Thanks Kay, it could be him as 1871 has Needle Scourer also
Mick
In 1861 I think William is listed on Anc as William Adkins 27 b Redditch a Needle Scourer? although he is listed as unmarried? William was lodging at Evesham Street Redditch
Kay
-
That 1871 census entry is as far as I can tell no longer on Familysearch as of the past 2 weeks or so.
If there is a replacement on Familysearch I've not located it.
I'm still in "conversation" with familysearch.
Mick