RootsChat.Com

Some Special Interests => Occupation Interests => Topic started by: jane k on Friday 19 November 21 18:07 GMT (UK)

Title: "Clergyman without care of souls"
Post by: jane k on Friday 19 November 21 18:07 GMT (UK)
Just seen this on a census - would it mean a retired vicar?
Title: Re: "Clergyman without care of souls"
Post by: iluleah on Friday 19 November 21 18:15 GMT (UK)
A clergyman without any pastoral duties, so could describe someone who was retired or working in another occupation such as religious teaching
Title: Re: "Clergyman without care of souls"
Post by: Vance Mead on Friday 19 November 21 19:57 GMT (UK)
Is it "without care" or "without cure" of souls. As sine cura?
Title: Re: "Clergyman without care of souls"
Post by: majm on Friday 19 November 21 20:25 GMT (UK)
From the census document, how old is the clergyman? 

JM
Title: Re: "Clergyman without care of souls"
Post by: Bookbox on Friday 19 November 21 21:20 GMT (UK)
His age is immaterial. ‘Without cure of souls’ is a standard phrase, indicating that he was ordained but was not officiating in a parish at that time.

As Vance has said, the usual word is ‘cure’, not ‘care’, although there is always a chance that the person who filled in the household schedule, and/or the census enumerator, wrote it incorrectly.
Title: Re: "Clergyman without care of souls"
Post by: GrahamSimons on Friday 19 November 21 21:39 GMT (UK)
Often seen linked to Fellows of universities, or to teachers.
Title: Re: "Clergyman without care of souls"
Post by: jane k on Saturday 20 November 21 08:26 GMT (UK)
Thanks very much. It`s difficult to see if it is "care" or "cure".  He is 59 and, according to his probate records later, quite a wealthy chap