RootsChat.Com

England (Counties as in 1851-1901) => England => Surrey => Topic started by: Ratty2 on Sunday 28 November 21 06:43 GMT (UK)

Title: Cassell, George b1875
Post by: Ratty2 on Sunday 28 November 21 06:43 GMT (UK)
George Cassell was born in 1875 and married Rose Inness 6 Aug 1903 at the Wesleyan church, Lucknow, India. His father's name was Emmanuel Cassell, and Rose's father, John Inness.
At the time of the marriage, George was 28, Rose was 18. This info taken from their MC now held at the British Library.
From the MC he said he was a Private with the IInd Battalion, East Surrey - hence my belief he was born and baptized somewhere in East Surrey.
Looking for information of the family. Not found in 1901 or 1911 Census that I could see; and no sign of Rose or her father John.
As always, your help is much appreciated.
David
Title: Re: Cassell, George b1875
Post by: Kay99 on Sunday 28 November 21 07:12 GMT (UK)
I think George's army records are on FindMyPast - Lists him as born 1874 Kingston, Surrey - Recruited -1893 - discharged 1905 with permisson to remain in India  His surname is spelt Casell

Next of Kin listed as Mother Elizabeth residing in Bristol and  Sister residing at 25 Fairfield PLace Kingston on Thames

Kay
Title: Re: Cassell, George b1875
Post by: tonepad on Sunday 28 November 21 08:29 GMT (UK)
Christian names     George   
Surname     Casell   
City     Lucknow   
Location     St. Peter's church   
Type of record     Burial   
Year     1948   
Ref No     SPTD117   
Photo Nos     P1050476   

https://fibis.ourarchives.online/bin/aps_detail.php?id=1548601

There are also other records on the fibis database


Tony


Added: Rose Casell also appears under this Ref No in 1948.
Title: Re: Cassell, George b1875
Post by: Kay99 on Sunday 28 November 21 08:57 GMT (UK)
Just in case this helps - his sister is listed as 25 Fairfield Place Kingston on the Army Records and this couple were living there in 1901.   I noticed that Ellen was also born in Kingston - possible sister :-\  I can't see a marriage for the couple

William F Nicholls 34 b Birmingham Intinerant Musician
Ellen S Nicholls    29 b Kingston

Kay
Title: Re: Cassell, George b1875
Post by: heywood on Sunday 28 November 21 09:46 GMT (UK)
In 1891 610/25
Elizabeth Hilton, widow and 7 children are at the address 25 Fairfield Place - the two youngest children, 3 yrs and 1 yr were born Kingston, the other Windsor.

Title: Re: Cassell, George b1875
Post by: hanes teulu on Sunday 28 November 21 10:47 GMT (UK)
FindMyPast has 2 records for George Casell

The earlier attestation, 4th Bat East Surrey Regt, No 7249, 7 Mar 1893 includes -
Current address - 4, Young's Buildings, Eden Street and last 12 months 25, Mill Street, Kingston.
Occpn - bricklayer's labourer

Title: Re: Cassell, George b1875
Post by: hanes teulu on Sunday 28 November 21 11:34 GMT (UK)
Trying to decide if George Casell, attested 1893 (twice) is the George Casell that attested 1889, No 2880 (transcribed as 28800 by FindMyPast), born Clewer near Windsor.

There is a Clewer baptism for a Henry George Castle, 7 Sep 1873, abode Clewer, parents Henry and Elizabeth.

All a bit tenuous
Title: Re: Cassell, George b1875
Post by: Kay99 on Sunday 28 November 21 11:47 GMT (UK)
They both spelt their first name as Gorge and surname as Casell and this physcial description is similiar  :)

Kay
Title: Re: Cassell, George b1875
Post by: hanes teulu on Sunday 28 November 21 12:00 GMT (UK)
Checked again - his early 1893 attestation mentions the 3rd Royal Berks!!
Title: Re: Cassell, George b1875
Post by: Kay99 on Sunday 28 November 21 12:05 GMT (UK)
Yes - I think it's the same person.   I wonder if he changes his birthplace based on his home at the time? :-\

Kay
Title: Re: Cassell, George b1875
Post by: Kay99 on Sunday 28 November 21 12:14 GMT (UK)
Interesting that the person living at 25 Fairfield Place in 1891 (the address of George's sister ) was born in Windsor close Clewer!   Maybe just a coincidence :-\

In 1891 610/25
Elizabeth Hilton, widow and 7 children are at the address 25 Fairfield Place - the two youngest children, 3 yrs and 1 yr were born Kingston, the other Windsor.

Kay
Title: Re: Cassell, George b1875
Post by: heywood on Sunday 28 November 21 12:15 GMT (UK)
Trying to decide if George Casell, attested 1893 (twice) is the George Casell that attested 1889, No 2880 (transcribed as 28800 by FindMyPast), born Clewer near Windsor.

There is a Clewer baptism for a Henry George Castle, 7 Sep 1873, abode Clewer, parents Henry and Elizabeth.

All a bit tenuous

Henry G Castle is still at home in 1901 1170/129/ 27 with parents Henry and Adelaide E (could that be Elizabeth?)
Title: Re: Cassell, George b1875
Post by: heywood on Sunday 28 November 21 12:22 GMT (UK)
Interesting that the person living at 25 Fairfield Place in 1891 (the address of George's sister ) was born in Windsor close Clewer!   Maybe just a coincidence :-\

In 1891 610/25
Elizabeth Hilton, widow and 7 children are at the address 25 Fairfield Place - the two youngest children, 3 yrs and 1 yr were born Kingston, the other Windsor.

Kay

Elizabeth Hilton’s husband was Emanuel Hilton in 1881 1324 /53/10

The children look to have mother’s name Brown.
Title: Re: Cassell, George b1875
Post by: hanes teulu on Sunday 28 November 21 12:25 GMT (UK)
George gives his previous address as "25 Mill Street, Kingston" in his April 1893 attestation. "Fairfield Place" runs off Mill Street.
 

Think we can rule out the Clewer baptism.
Title: Re: Cassell, George b1875
Post by: Kay99 on Sunday 28 November 21 12:31 GMT (UK)
Interesting that the person living at 25 Fairfield Place in 1891 (the address of George's sister ) was born in Windsor close Clewer!   Maybe just a coincidence :-\

In 1891 610/25
Elizabeth Hilton, widow and 7 children are at the address 25 Fairfield Place - the two youngest children, 3 yrs and 1 yr were born Kingston, the other Windsor.

Kay

Elizabeth Hilton’s husband was Emanuel Hilton in 1881 1324 /53/10

The children look to have mother’s name Brown.

And Emanuel's birthplace was Kingston, Surrey  :-\ 
Title: Re: Cassell, George b1875
Post by: hanes teulu on Sunday 28 November 21 12:48 GMT (UK)
An Emanuel Hilton was in trouble with the authorities in Jun 1881 and Feb 1882 for deserting his wife and six children, leaving them chargeable to the Windsor Union. Mrs Hilton had discharged herself from the workhouse early Feb 1882 and Emanuel was sentenced to 2 mths imprisonment.
Title: Re: Cassell, George b1875
Post by: heywood on Sunday 28 November 21 12:52 GMT (UK)
Surrey electoral registers have Emanuel Hilton at 25 Fairfield Place in 1890.
Title: Re: Cassell, George b1875
Post by: hanes teulu on Sunday 28 November 21 12:58 GMT (UK)
There's a lengthy article in the Windsor and Eton Express, 27 Apr 1878 where Mrs Hilton describes herself as "married 15 years", the address was "Park Row, Spital".

An Emanuel Hilton married Elizabeth Brown, Dec Qtr 1868, Windsor, 2c 852
 
Title: Re: Cassell, George b1875
Post by: Kay99 on Sunday 28 November 21 13:10 GMT (UK)
This is just a thought but

Emanuel Hilton
Baptism   23 Jun 1844 Long Ditton, St Mary, Surrey,
Mother: Jane Ellinor Hilton

Then I think Jane Eleanor Hilton marries a James Castle a widower on 5 Oct 1850 at  St Mary, Hadlow, Kent and Emanuel was living with the couple in 1851 in Cowley, Kingston

Thomas Castle    38 b Bucks
Jane Castle    26 b Kent
Emanuel Castle 7 b Surrey
Mary Castle    18 Daughter
James Castle    3 Son
Elizabeth Castle 91 Visitor
Thomas Castle    35 Brother
Thomas Castle    13 Son
George Castle    7 Son
Henry Castle    3 Son

Kay
Title: Re: Cassell, George b1875
Post by: heywood on Sunday 28 November 21 13:13 GMT (UK)
Looking good - a step closer  :)

Where does George b 1874/5 fit in, I wonder?

I had been thinking he could be illegitimate and Emmanuel Hilton was the father  :-\
Title: Re: Cassell, George b1875
Post by: Kay99 on Sunday 28 November 21 13:27 GMT (UK)
Looking good - a step closer  :)

Where does George b 1874/5 fit in, I wonder?

I had been thinking he could be illegitimate and Emmanuel Hilton was the father  :-\

I thought that but also wonder if one of Emanuel and Elizabeth's children changed his name as he names his mother as Elizabeth :-\
Title: Re: Cassell, George b1875
Post by: hanes teulu on Sunday 28 November 21 13:29 GMT (UK)
I have been wondering if he changed his name completely - he had a tough upbringing from the newspaper reports.
In 1881 we have an Emanuel Hilton, 9 and Joseph Hilton 7 - both born Windsor. Trying to find them in '91.
Title: Re: Cassell, George b1875
Post by: Kay99 on Sunday 28 November 21 14:41 GMT (UK)
I have been wondering if he changed his name completely - he had a tough upbringing from the newspaper reports.
In 1881 we have an Emanuel Hilton, 9 and Joseph Hilton 7 - both born Windsor. Trying to find them in '91.

I can see Joseph in 1901 I think but not Emanuel post 1881
Title: Re: Cassell, George b1875
Post by: hanes teulu on Sunday 28 November 21 15:04 GMT (UK)
A Joseph Hilton attested for the 3rd Bat Royal West Surry regt, 30 Sep 1892, No 6984, age 18yrs 6 mths, born Kingston, labourer.
Address 2, Hope Avenue.

Puzzled by the naming of George Albert Hilton, born 1883, Jun Qtr 1883, Windsor - mother Brown.

George attesting in 1893 states "mother, Bristol" but Elizabeth can be found in Fairfield Place in 1891 and 1901 - all very frustrating.
Title: Re: Cassell, George b1875
Post by: Kay99 on Sunday 28 November 21 15:17 GMT (UK)
On the first 1889 attestion for George Casell at the time he was 17 yrs 11 months on 15 Oct 1889 (although he was younger in the two later attestations).

If my maths is OK that puts him as born in Nov 1871 which would match with Emanuel Hilton's birth record   He's my best suggestion re George
Births Dec 1871   
Emanuel Hilton     Windsor    2c   417

Title: Re: Cassell, George b1875
Post by: Kay99 on Sunday 28 November 21 15:36 GMT (UK)
A Joseph Hilton attested for the 3rd Bat Royal West Surry regt, 30 Sep 1892, No 6984, age 18yrs 6 mths, born Kingston, labourer.
Address 2, Hope Avenue.

Puzzled by the naming of George Albert Hilton, born 1883, Jun Qtr 1883, Windsor - mother Brown.

George attesting in 1893 states "mother, Bristol" but Elizabeth can be found in Fairfield Place in 1891 and 1901 - all very frustrating.


I think George Albert is with Elizabeth and family in 1891.   Can't explain why it is mother Bristol though - it looks like it was added at a later date?  :-\

Title: Re: Cassell, George b1875
Post by: hanes teulu on Sunday 28 November 21 15:45 GMT (UK)
My money also is on Emanuel, 1871. The newspaper reports paint a very sad story of the hardships the family suffered. I wondered if he wanted to disassociate himself from his father's name? As usual, all very speculative.

Why are both Emanuel and Joseph so elusive in 1891?
Title: Re: Cassell, George b1875
Post by: heywood on Sunday 28 November 21 16:09 GMT (UK)
There is an Edward Hilton, 19yrs b Windsor, Berks at Farnborough North Camp, Farnborough. He is a Private in the Light Infantry (I think).
Title: Re: Cassell, George b1875
Post by: Ratty2 on Sunday 28 November 21 22:25 GMT (UK)
Thank you all for this most helpful research.
You have uncovered George's move to India and his parentage, which is great.

Would mind checking out Rose Inness, please?

Here is a snip from a family photo taken in India (unknown date). The three children of Rose (left) and George (right) are not shown, but are Anglo-Indian. They are holding their two grandchildren.

I am checking to see if Rose was herself Anglo-Indian married George 6 Aug 1903.
How do we go about clarifying Rose's heritage, please?

Thank you
David
Title: Re: Cassell, George b1875
Post by: Kay99 on Monday 29 November 21 03:45 GMT (UK)
Hello David

Does the MC give any occupation for Rose's father John??   Could he also have been in the Army? 

Kay
Title: Re: Cassell, George b1875
Post by: wivenhoe on Monday 29 November 21 03:50 GMT (UK)


George CASSELL marr. Rose INNESS 6 Aug 1903, Wesleyan church, Lucknow, India.

What names do you see for witnesses?
Title: Re: Cassell, George b1875
Post by: Ratty2 on Monday 29 November 21 10:01 GMT (UK)
No occupation given.

Witnesses are: Henry Hargreaves (maybe something else) and William Smith - but no occupations.
Roses' father was John Inness.

Going through FIBIS I found a John Innes married Jeanie Learmont, and John Innes could have had a father W Innes 1757-1816, who died at Dyrham, Somerset.

It's all rather garbled and uncertain from the few hits via FIBIS.

Title: Re: Cassell, George b1875
Post by: tonepad on Monday 29 November 21 10:30 GMT (UK)
The top witness looks like Henry Gardener


Tony
Title: Re: Cassell, George b1875
Post by: Kay99 on Monday 29 November 21 10:50 GMT (UK)

Going through FIBIS I found a John Innes married Jeanie Learmont, and John Innes could have had a father W Innes 1757-1816, who died at Dyrham, Somerset.

It's all rather garbled and uncertain from the few hits via FIBIS.

The John Innes - Jeanie Learmont marriage is also on FindMyPast
British India Office Marriages
9 Nov 1881 Calcutta
John Innes age 30 Coachbuilder father John Innes
Jeanie Learmont age 23 father Alexander Innes
Witnesses Peter Dickson Govan, Annie Govan and Robert Lawson

Kay
Title: Re: Cassell, George b1875
Post by: Ratty2 on Tuesday 30 November 21 01:30 GMT (UK)
Thank you very much.
Ive checked FindMyPast and Ancestry, there is very little re Rose Inness but there are some others named Rose or Inness who might be related (by a long shot).
Capt W Inness 1757-1816 is to be found via FIBIS, a surgeon. He married Isabelle Rawstorne in 1799, born to Major General Edward Rawstorne.
But proving these links seems to me to be pretty tenuous.

I was interested that the births of the children at that early date were recorded euphemistically (?) as "The lady of General was delivered of a son/daughter."

Title: Re: Cassell, George b1875
Post by: horsesmad on Sunday 13 February 22 14:36 GMT (UK)
Hi emmanuel 1844 is my x great grand fathers half brother, they share the same mother jane hilton, can anyone tell me where the stories are about the hiltons, also we have a dna match with a person with george cassell and rose innes in their tree so it was very interesting to read all the above. its the right family as all the places and addresses are correct.