RootsChat.Com

England (Counties as in 1851-1901) => England => Yorkshire (East Riding & York) => Topic started by: andrewp91 on Tuesday 21 March 23 18:16 GMT (UK)

Title: Francis Hunter 1806-1876
Post by: andrewp91 on Tuesday 21 March 23 18:16 GMT (UK)
I am looking for anything that could help me locate the parents/Siblings of Francis Hunter (abt.1806-abt. 13 Jun 1876) please. I am also looking for a burial record of his if possible.

I am aware of a tree that has a father and mother with a headstone, however, there is little other a coincidence to provide some sort of proof that these are his parents.

The following information is what I have on him in order.

Baptism; 10 Jan 1806 Sutton in Holderness, York, England. (Father is William Hunter).

Marriage; 18 Oct 1822 Sculcoates, York, England.
Married Jane Gibson (abt.1807 -  Sep 1878)

Occupation; Joiner/Carpenter

1841 Census; Piece 1226, Book 8, Folio 8
1851 Census; Piece 2358, Folio 407, Page number 10
1861 Census; FOUND, BUT UNABLE TO LOCATE PIECE, FOLIO, AND PAGE NUMBER.
1871 Census; Piece 4765 Folio 17, Page number 5

Children;
Jemima Hunter (abt.1823 - 1 February 1907) - Married James Voakes (11 Jan 1818 - 2 Jun 1894)
Elizabeth Hunter (abt.1824 - March 1912) - Married William Coates (abt.1831) on 18 Mar 1852
Sarah Hunter (abt.1827)
Samuel Hunter (abt.1830)
Mary Hunter (abt.1831)
Ann Hunter (abt.1833)
Jane Hunter (abt.1836)
Frances Hunter (abt.1837)
William Thomas Hunter (abt.1841)
Jane Ellen Hunter (abt.1844)

Probate; 18 Sep 1876. Leaves Effects to Jane Hunter.

*Note* Further details may be found here for Thomas William Hunter whom I am under the impression (after a bit of digging) is the son of Elizabeth Hunter before her marriage to William Coates https://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php?topic=870291.new#new (https://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php?topic=870291.new#new)
Title: Re: Francis Hunter 1806-1876
Post by: Neale1961 on Tuesday 21 March 23 23:56 GMT (UK)
William Hunter death 1822 Sutton-on-Hull (born abt 1763)
Spouse Sarah Hunter
https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/217899427/william-hunter

1841 census Sutton-on-Hull (Chamberline Hospital)
Sarah Hunter 75 born in county

1851 census Sutton-on-Hull
Sarah Hunter 86 widow annuitant born Hull (born abt 1765)
Title: Re: Francis Hunter 1806-1876
Post by: Neale1961 on Tuesday 21 March 23 23:57 GMT (UK)
Marriage 13 May 1787 Hull
Sarah Thompson to William Hunter

CHILDREN:
•   James Hunter baptism 15 Mar 1788 Hull Holy Trinity -  Father William, mother Sarah

      All other children baptised St James, Sutton-on-Hull -  father William

•   Elizabeth 8 Apr 1790
•   Robert Hall 3 July 1791
•   Jane 19 Mar 1793
•   William 11 Mar 1795
•   Samuel 14 Mar 1797
•   Benjamin 5 May 1799
•   Thomas McKie 14 Sept 1801
•   George 9 June 1803
•   Francis 10 Jan 1806
•   Septimus 28 June 1807
•   Johnson 2 July 1808
•   Anthony 21 Jun 1811


I haven’t looked to see which children died in infancy / childhood.
One might expect to see the surnames Hall and McKie in earlier generations
Title: Re: Francis Hunter 1806-1876
Post by: Neale1961 on Wednesday 22 March 23 00:21 GMT (UK)
Francis Hunter (abt.1806-abt. 13 Jun 1876) please. I am also looking for a burial record of his if possible.
Francis Hunter
Burial 15 June 1876, Eastrington Yorkshire East RIding
Residence: Newport

The clue is in the probate index
Probate for Francis Hunter late of Gilberdyke in the Parish of Eastrington in the East Riding …… Joiner who died 13 June 1876 …….
Title: Re: Francis Hunter 1806-1876
Post by: Neale1961 on Wednesday 22 March 23 00:55 GMT (UK)

1861 Census; FOUND, BUT UNABLE TO LOCATE PIECE, FOLIO, AND PAGE NUMBER.

1861 census Gilberdike Mill, Yorkshire East Riding

RG9/3566/21 p 14
Title: Re: Francis Hunter 1806-1876
Post by: Treetotal on Monday 27 March 23 22:45 BST (UK)
Great work Neale  8)
Carol
Title: Re: Francis Hunter 1806-1876
Post by: Neale1961 on Monday 27 March 23 23:01 BST (UK)
Thanks Carol.  :)
What a shame that Andrewp91 doesn't seem to be interested in his own post.
I see no point in posting further information.
Title: Re: Francis Hunter 1806-1876
Post by: Treetotal on Monday 27 March 23 23:06 BST (UK)
I thought that too, but didn't like to say in case he had sent s personal message to you.
I don't think people realise how much works goes into searches  :-\
Carol
Title: Re: Francis Hunter 1806-1876
Post by: andrewp91 on Tuesday 28 March 23 08:49 BST (UK)
Thank you to the person who sent a notification to me about this via private message.

To your original comments. Thank you for also finding the information that I had regarding a William and Sarah Thompson, not sure how you managed to select these two people as the being the definite people considering there does not seem to be a record showing Francis’s mother anywhere and with a name like William Hunter, I’m sure there probably been many families around at a similar time. (Hence the reason I was asking for some proof of the parents).

Thank you also finding the information I didn’t have (the burial), not sure where this is sourced or how you found it (the date) but you managed to find something I didn’t have. So genuinely, thank you for that.

Regarding your newer post understandably you might seem a little annoyed at not receiving a reply back, although petty, it doesn’t cost a lot to say ‘thank you’. However,.. you know what actually, I just wrote a whole thing about the reason why but then realised I don’t need to explain myself to anyone on why I failed to report back with questions or appreciations. The world does not revolve around Rootschat and things happen in peoples lives.

And as for your ‘I see no point in posting further information’ think it’s best for all if you don’t reply back with all due respect. But again thank you for the burial you did find.


Title: Re: Francis Hunter 1806-1876
Post by: Neale1961 on Tuesday 28 March 23 23:00 BST (UK)
Regarding your newer post understandably you might seem a little annoyed at not receiving a reply back, although petty, it doesn’t cost a lot to say ‘thank you’. However,.. you know what actually, I just wrote a whole thing about the reason why but then realised I don’t need to explain myself to anyone on why I failed to report back with questions or appreciations. The world does not revolve around Rootschat and things happen in peoples lives.
And as for your ‘I see no point in posting further information’ think it’s best for all if you don’t reply back with all due respect.

Andrewp91, Your rudeness / insulting reply is on display for all to see.
I did NOT contact you via private message. I did NOT ask for a reply, NOR did I ever request a reason for your lack of response.
What I DID DO, was respond to your request for assistance, by willingly spending a large part of a day researching your family for you, and responding to your particular questions.
Your hostility towards me is totally unwarranted.


Thank you for also finding the information that I had regarding a William and Sarah Thompson, not sure how you managed to select these two people as the being the definite people considering there does not seem to be a record showing Francis’s mother anywhere and with a name like William Hunter, I’m sure there probably been many families around at a similar time. (Hence the reason I was asking for some proof of the parents).

You are quite free to disregard my research, as you seem to have contrary information from all the other contributors here on this thread. Had you been able to engage in logical, mature and respectful discussion, I would have been happy to demonstrate the proof of parentage.
Title: Re: Francis Hunter 1806-1876
Post by: andrewp91 on Tuesday 28 March 23 23:13 BST (UK)
Considering I’ve had a few messages of support and concern from users saying my comment was fair in a challenging way and asking if everything is okay, I think I’m more than happy to keep my comments visible.

Who said you private messaged me? Who asked if you wanted to reply to you?
I see no correlation into what you are saying there...

You forgot to mention what you DID DO was you ‘added extra comments’ which were RUDE, argumentative and unhelpful. There was absolutely no reason for you to write that. It was 5 days from your post til your extra comments.
Your later comment where you state that I have no interest in my on family posts is extremely disgusting. You had absolute zero right to say that when you have no idea in what is going on in other peoples lives.

As I mentioned before, there is an awful lot more to deal with at the moment, none of it is your personal business, whilst I originally was going to share with you why, I then realised the way in writing you was using was very negative and distasteful. As mentioned, there are reason for why I had to put this on the back foot.

Had you added ‘extra comments’ that would have helpful in a respectful way you may have had a much better more considerate response. You cannot claim you are innocent in this. And neither can I (as I did not come back with questions or appreciation within the 5 days of you posting till now), however I was not the one to add silly comments about showing lack of interests.

I asked you politely once before to not respond to this as you clearly know how to play people and manipulate situations.

I have thanked you and and now I kindly request ONCE AGAIN to please not respond to this. It will be a form of harassment if you do as clearly you want to try and antagonise
Thank you.

Andrewp91, Your rudeness / insulting reply is on display for all to see.
I did NOT contact you via private message. I did NOT ask for a reply, NOR did I ever request a reason for your lack of response.
Title: Re: Francis Hunter 1806-1876
Post by: sarah on Wednesday 29 March 23 19:53 BST (UK)
Quote
it doesn’t cost a lot to say ‘thank you’.
Quite so Andrew totally agree it does not take long to say "Thank you" two little words. Sadly all your other words you chose to use were used to cause upset and offense I do not understand why you would want to cause someone who was helping you so much upset ?

Sarah