Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Forguette

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 17
1
The Stay Safe Board / Re: Anti-vaxxers' arguments
« on: Friday 03 September 21 18:31 BST (UK)  »
Yes erato, so you keep saying.
Means nothing, adds nothing.
But it is your opinion and you're entitled to it.

2
The Stay Safe Board / Re: Anti-vaxxers' arguments
« on: Friday 03 September 21 18:09 BST (UK)  »
Semantics, trials/experiments. Still leaves a lot of guinea pigs, no matter how  you split the terminology.
This being a family history forum, I think it is fair to expect a high percentage of experienced, historical researchers, whose capabilities stretch beyond 2020 and the onset of covid. Who can go back as far as their searches take them. Who can then assimilate or join the dots of those searches and form their own conclusions, opinions and decisions based on those findings.
They reserve and deserve that right .
Nobody has the right to demand that someone else should be forced to comply with their opinion/decision. No matter WHO they may be, or what 'position' they hold.
Emotional appeals of don't mention/consider/research/refer to... it's hurtful to Jews, is in itself harmful.
I may be Jewish.
I may be Jewish and multi vaccinated.
It's not about Jews, they were only one segment of a targeted population. It's not even about Nazis, it went beyond and further back than that.
Aktion T4 was ongoing before either of the World Wars. The main advocates, among others, being USA, CANADA, DENMARK.
Soldiers enlisting for WW1, had to comply to be vaccinated, conscription effectively was forced medical compliance. Many of these soldiers died as a result of vaccination before they even had a chance to die abroad.
Covid is just another link in a very long chain of scientists and their ideas/ideals.
Some may say that the Mad Scientists have taken over. The lunatics running the asylum so to speak.
Science and Technology and religion, my personal research and experience, my dots, join to form a much bigger picture than what is shown on the surface of each individual dot.
But these are my opinions, of which I have the right to form and to go by. I don't insist that you must adhere to them.
I do insist that you research and find your own dots, to form and follow your own bigger picture... and that your research goes beyond 2020.
As I have already said, this is a family history forum, that is why I chose to be on this forum, that is why I am here. This is not a medical research forum, I'm sure there are plenty medical forums to be joined if that is your wont. The only connection I can see is the use of unwitting family history researchers who upload their Dna/genetics to form a worldwide database.
Let's hope they, or their descendants don't suffer because of that decision.
Our original OP has declined to join his own thread apparently, left his inflammatory post, jumped in once, reply #11, with the tired (and tiresome) old trope about conspiracy theories then shuffled off to hide. In street parlance, a troublemaker, a sh*t stirrer and nothing more.
In summary, this forum is not the place for this topic. But it does show that facism is still alive and festering.

3
The Stay Safe Board / Re: Anti-vaxxers' arguments
« on: Thursday 02 September 21 19:36 BST (UK)  »
Firstly, this link should allay any questions on the FACT that this IS a medical trial.

https://covid19vaccinetrial.co.uk

Secondly, the link I posted previously,
Very much relevant to medical trials being forced upon human subjects.
Here it is again.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(04)17619-8/fulltext
Is from THE LANCET.
Lastly, you attempt to tarnish the validity of these MEDICAL AUTHORITY links, with an unreferenced, anonymous quote from a museum spokesperson.
If anyone fails, or ignorantly refuses to see the correlation between history and today, then we are on the road to repeating it.

4
The Stay Safe Board / Re: Anti-vaxxers' arguments
« on: Thursday 02 September 21 00:35 BST (UK)  »
Elaborate, please?
Dissect my comment, word for word, what is in there that is 'deplorable'?
Then have a read of the tone of the provaxxer comments. I find that deplorable.

Goodnight.

5
The Stay Safe Board / Re: Anti-vaxxers' arguments
« on: Thursday 02 September 21 00:03 BST (UK)  »
Actually, this whole thread is not nice. Actually this whole thread is offensive , as are many of the posts on this board. If anyone wishes to partake in medical experimentation, because that is what these different vaccines are, medical trials. Then that is your prerogative but to insist that everyone else should... Well, all that's missing is your jackboots. Nuremberg anyone?
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(04)17619-8/fulltext

6
The Stay Safe Board / Re: Anti-vaxxers' arguments
« on: Wednesday 01 September 21 23:19 BST (UK)  »
Now Now, Chas...

"Technically, it is not wrong is it?"

Definitely gives the reader the impression that your follow up comment is referring to the content of the article/s posted.
When in reality there is no correlation there at all... If you check the articles
Bushlnn posted.
Doing that, the reader is then left with the impression that you were attempting to belittle the content of the posting...
and that's just not nice. Nor is it unbiased.
Think you should say sorry.

7
The Common Room / Re: Death Cert
« on: Wednesday 01 September 21 22:01 BST (UK)  »
Reflector, may I enquire whether you and your cousin have done Dna tests?

8
Dublin / Re: How to find Prisoner's charges in Mountjoy Prison
« on: Wednesday 01 September 21 21:51 BST (UK)  »
This depends on your perspective. I see no shame nor embarrassment in finding a prisoner in my tree. I'm just thankful not to find the prison dodgers. The real criminals. i.e the rich, the slave traders, those who get fat on the misery, deprivation and hard work of others. The Lords, the "gentlemen",  the landed gentry, feudal landlords, the mill owners, and etc. etc.
These are the real embarrasment. The real criminals.

9
Angus (Forfarshire) / Re: Hutchisons in Montrose (late C18th)
« on: Wednesday 01 September 21 21:32 BST (UK)  »
Have you tried the kirk session records on the link provided? They are not indexed so wouldn't appear in search results. You just need to chose your relevant parish and start reading through them.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 17