1
Kent / Re: James Hickmott bc1839-44
« on: Friday 12 May 23 14:16 BST (UK) »
Again, thanks to everyone who has contributed to this thread.
On the 1864 Hickmott / Wallace marriage, despite a bit more digging and the fact that there is no GRO registration and no mention of the couple in the 1871+ Census Returns suggests to me that perhaps the marriage never took place.
I'm also still puzzled why Samuel and Susanna's 1839 Marriage does not appear on the FreeBMD site?
Anyway, onwards and upwards...
On the 1864 Hickmott / Wallace marriage, despite a bit more digging and the fact that there is no GRO registration and no mention of the couple in the 1871+ Census Returns suggests to me that perhaps the marriage never took place.
I'm also still puzzled why Samuel and Susanna's 1839 Marriage does not appear on the FreeBMD site?
Anyway, onwards and upwards...