1
Lancashire / Re: Yarwood Thomas 1861
« on: Today at 18:40 »
There are so many of the same names, no wonder you are finding it hard. 
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
2
Mayo / Re: Bridget CURRAN
« on: Today at 18:22 »
Thank you Octo.
Sadly, not much help.
There are a couple of Bridget Currans in Oldham about the right time but one is married and the other, an older widow.
There is a Michael and Mary Prendergast in Oldham in 1871 but I don’t see them later.
There are quite a few Irish born in 1871/81 around Smethurst Street too.
Not yet found any good records in Mayo either.
What was Daniel’s occupation given as, please?
Sadly, not much help.
There are a couple of Bridget Currans in Oldham about the right time but one is married and the other, an older widow.
There is a Michael and Mary Prendergast in Oldham in 1871 but I don’t see them later.
There are quite a few Irish born in 1871/81 around Smethurst Street too.
Not yet found any good records in Mayo either.
What was Daniel’s occupation given as, please?
3
Lancashire / Re: Yarwood Thomas 1861
« on: Today at 17:20 »
Thomas Yarwood snr was a Blacksmith so may well have been a brother. His son, Thomas was a Fustian Dyer and looks to have married and settled in Ashton under Lyne.
4
Lancashire / Re: Yarwood Thomas 1861
« on: Today at 17:11 »
Oh I only looked at William and Woodhouses!
Su,
When you say he was in his father’s accounts books with an Ardwick address, are there other clues?
There is a Thomas and Ann, with a son Thomas of similar age, living in Ardwick with Bowden connections.
Could the father be William’s brother?
Su,
When you say he was in his father’s accounts books with an Ardwick address, are there other clues?
There is a Thomas and Ann, with a son Thomas of similar age, living in Ardwick with Bowden connections.
Could the father be William’s brother?
5
Lancashire / Re: Yarwood Thomas 1861
« on: Today at 16:53 »
He is not with his parents in 1851 2162 /615/23
He is with his family at 1841 91/7/20
Thomas Yarwood, 7 yrs
There is a Thomas in 1851, 16 yrs at 1851 2162 /634/21
He is a farm labourer in the household of Marlborough Hardey
He is with his family at 1841 91/7/20
Thomas Yarwood, 7 yrs
There is a Thomas in 1851, 16 yrs at 1851 2162 /634/21
He is a farm labourer in the household of Marlborough Hardey
6
Galway / Re: Peter REILLY - son of James REILLY - see previous chats on James
« on: Today at 15:05 »
Thanks for the explanation.
7
Galway / Re: PETER REILLY - SON OF JAMES REILLY - SEE PREVIOUS CHATS ON JAMES
« on: Today at 13:36 »
Sorry - so did Peter emigrate?
Have you found any records other than that death?
Are his parents mentioned in the death record?
Have you found any records other than that death?
Are his parents mentioned in the death record?
8
Galway / Re: PETER REILLY - SON OF JAMES REILLY - SEE PREVIOUS CHATS ON JAMES
« on: Today at 13:14 »
Is this his birth? - James and Nellie (Cullinan)
https://civilrecords.irishgenealogy.ie/churchrecords/images/birth_returns/births_1918/01269/1526594.pdf
Are you now trying to find him in US?
As Carole says, have you got him in US censuses?
What exactly are you looking for?
https://civilrecords.irishgenealogy.ie/churchrecords/images/birth_returns/births_1918/01269/1526594.pdf
Are you now trying to find him in US?
As Carole says, have you got him in US censuses?
What exactly are you looking for?
9
Census Lookup and Resource Requests / Re: Brick Wall due to marriage not with GRO
« on: Today at 10:44 »
Another tree matches David Phelps with Martha James.
This leaves William John and Anne Griffith as possible spouses.
Found the marriage - his father is James John and William is a collier. Does that fit?
This leaves William John and Anne Griffith as possible spouses.
Found the marriage - his father is James John and William is a collier. Does that fit?