Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - hurworth

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 151
1
The Common Room / Re: New Scottish records at Ancestry.
« on: Wednesday 26 March 25 19:43 GMT (UK)  »
With the SP records, it's possible to put up the images in Gallery and link to them in the individual record.

Yes.  But if I can link the new record set to my tree it will help them to come up as hints for others.  The actual images are already there on Ancestry showing the baptism and the father was called James, and a death notice from a newspaper that states the father was James, but quite a few people who decided to link these just added them and don't seem to have looked at them properly.

If they go to link this index Ancestry will point out that they're linking a record for a James to someone in their tree called Henry and hopefully they'll think about this.

2
Ancestral Family Tree DNA Testing / Re: I am so upset .....
« on: Tuesday 25 March 25 19:20 GMT (UK)  »

The random ahnentafel numbers make it clear that these "foreign" trees haven't been built the hard way.  There is obviously some means of cobbling together different ancestry trees with minimal clicks/keystrokes.  I've taken an Ancestry DNA test and it seems thrulines may be how it happens.  Click on any ancestor with matches on the thrulines page, if in the Relationships (tree view) tab there are individuals in green with "evaluate" against them, a few more clicks seems to be all it takes to add entire branches.

Jane :-)

The green "potential ancestors" that appear, with Thrulines but also if you have a parentless individual in your tree is definitely how much of this happens.  Also Ancestry used to provide in hints to three other trees at a time with trees that have the same person in their tree, and it took a couple of clicks to link everyone.  Now it's just one tree.  I suspect many do not notice is the green EVALUATE button next to the potential ancestor in Thrulines.

Most of my trees are private including a large (30,000+) quick and dirty tree for when I'm playing around with ideas and still searching. I became very frustrated with incorrect info about one set of ancestors (in the 1970s was printed and distributed at a family reunion) that I have made that tree public with images from parish records, newspapers etc.  I regularly make contact with the incorrect info based on the 1970s info and send them a link to the tree (as many do not have a sub).  It's slow work....  Five years on from working out who were the correct parents of my Scottish gtgtgtgt-grandmother was there are still numerous trees that show her from Alloa, not Fife, and with the wrong parents.  And Ancestry brings up the wrong parents (in green) for her. 

3
The Common Room / Re: New Scottish records at Ancestry.
« on: Tuesday 25 March 25 18:42 GMT (UK)  »
Thank you for your replies everyone.

I'm a regular user of ScotlandsPeople - wish they did some bulk discount, or offered 5 free credits for every 50 you buy or something, or even a sub instead of pay as you go!  I have more than 500 records in my saved searches, and at at least 6 credits each that's around ...... mumble mumble....a lot.  The earliest being a will from the 1590s that's almost unreadable.  I also use our local FamilySearch affiliate library to browse records.  I trawled through a couple of decades of 17th century Edinburgh baptisms (it's about 100 images each year) as there was no way I could afford to buy that many records and I was mostly looking for sponsors to help work out kith and kin.  So I'm very familiar with ScotlandsPeople.

My question in my first post was whether accessing these three particular record sets via Ancestry is working for others.


4
The Common Room / Re: New Scottish records at Ancestry.
« on: Tuesday 25 March 25 08:26 GMT (UK)  »
This a different record set from Scotland, Select Births and Baptisms, 1564-1950 that has been available on Ancestry for some time.  The new set includes some family records that aren't included in those, but are on ScotlandsPeople.

I already have these records, but would also like to be able to link the records on Ancestry to various trees of mine.

5
The Common Room / Re: New Scottish records at Ancestry.
« on: Tuesday 25 March 25 06:50 GMT (UK)  »
I'm glad it's working for you.  Seems a sub that includes UK isn't accessing them at the moment although it should.

I know they're at ScotlandsPeople.  I just checked to see how many 'Saved Images" I have there and there's over 50 pages (so more than 500 records)


6
The Common Room / Re: New Scottish records at Ancestry.
« on: Tuesday 25 March 25 03:09 GMT (UK)  »
I use ScotlandsPeople all the time Rena. 


7
The Common Room / Re: New Scottish records at Ancestry.
« on: Tuesday 25 March 25 03:04 GMT (UK)  »
Hi Jang,

My sub is from the Australian site - UK Heritage Plus and I'm also being offered an upgrade for  $21.99 a month - that's the UK Heritage (Minus LOL) sub.

8
The Common Room / New Scottish records at Ancestry.
« on: Monday 24 March 25 23:56 GMT (UK)  »
I was pleased to see several new record sets at Ancestry, including Select Counties, Scotland, Church of Scotland, Burials, 1655-1854; Select Counties, Scotland, Church of Scotland, Baptisms, 1615-1854
and Select Counties, Scotland, Church of Scotland, Marriages, 1615-1854

However, even though my subscription includes UK records I'm not able to access them.

Is anyone else having this problem?

9
London and Middlesex / Re: Were babies of prostitutes usually baptised or registered?
« on: Sunday 23 February 25 06:44 GMT (UK)  »
There's a woman in the family tree that I think was a prostitute.  She didn't marry and had at least five children over almost 20 years.  I've mentioned her here before.  She was found guilty of being a lewd woman and having a child chargeable to the parish, so was sent to prison for a year.  Can't quite see how that helped matters as now she wasn't available to care for her children.

I have found baptisms for most of her children.  The youngest was born in 1832, prior to registration.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 151