1
London & Middlesex Completed Lookup Requests / Re: Worwoods lookup - 1841 & 1851
« on: Thursday 20 March 08 02:53 GMT (UK) »
Hi Bryant
My appologies, I do have a lot of what you have sent now.....so I am really sorry I should have asked Biker to change the Post to go with my worwood posts and out of the 1841 and Biker if you are listening (grin) Appologies to you also. I will remove the whole thing in a few days after I am certain you received my reply. I still cannot find him on the 1851 census either so that was why I left it there. The 1851 might answer a lot of questions. But nobody can find him.
But Bryant I still cannot ascertain the parentage, which is why I posted for the addresses to be checked in the 1841 & 1851 originally.
The IGI gives John and Sarah as having a daughter Charlotte Elizabeth Worwood chr Rotherhithe 1816
The fact that the only James unaccounted for, is with John and Sarah in the 1841 census and the right age of course, and he later lived in the same street, I am sure that he is my James....with John and Sarah
The marriage of Charlotte Elizabeth to John Fenton on the PR's does NOT state widowed so another Worwood researcher told me.
We have followed all the other James Worwood/Warwoods. One James (no middle name) remains unmarried his whole life and the other is up north in Staff and in an assylum. All the others are married to someone else.
We cannot find a Charlotte Elizabeths Worwoods death at all. So she remarried or married for the first time to John Fenton. We cannot find a death of a James Thomas Worwood the eldest either.
We have been through the waterman cd as well, collated and cross referenced and followed every one we can.
I really believe that Charlotte Elizabeth either lied about the father or the father was a cousin (the unmarried one perhaps)
and they were not allowed to marry. It said he was a carpenter on the PR
but a waterman on the marriage entry for James Thomas junior.
The family of the unmarried James are all watermen. So you see why we think Charlotte lied. I could go on and on with other vague proof.
But my Worwood cousin has decided to bite the bullet and hire a researcher. WE have a database of BMD's, and IGI, and everything you can think of, and cannot find any marriage, or James Thomas Worwood that fits, except those above. Put it this way we are doing reverse genealogy. If you can't prove something, prove it cannot be anything else. Sigh !!
Sorry for wasting your time hon.
The 1851 census might tie it all together but I have tried every trick in the book to find them another James and Charlotte, either or.
Cheers Pam
My appologies, I do have a lot of what you have sent now.....so I am really sorry I should have asked Biker to change the Post to go with my worwood posts and out of the 1841 and Biker if you are listening (grin) Appologies to you also. I will remove the whole thing in a few days after I am certain you received my reply. I still cannot find him on the 1851 census either so that was why I left it there. The 1851 might answer a lot of questions. But nobody can find him.
But Bryant I still cannot ascertain the parentage, which is why I posted for the addresses to be checked in the 1841 & 1851 originally.
The IGI gives John and Sarah as having a daughter Charlotte Elizabeth Worwood chr Rotherhithe 1816
The fact that the only James unaccounted for, is with John and Sarah in the 1841 census and the right age of course, and he later lived in the same street, I am sure that he is my James....with John and Sarah
The marriage of Charlotte Elizabeth to John Fenton on the PR's does NOT state widowed so another Worwood researcher told me.
We have followed all the other James Worwood/Warwoods. One James (no middle name) remains unmarried his whole life and the other is up north in Staff and in an assylum. All the others are married to someone else.
We cannot find a Charlotte Elizabeths Worwoods death at all. So she remarried or married for the first time to John Fenton. We cannot find a death of a James Thomas Worwood the eldest either.
We have been through the waterman cd as well, collated and cross referenced and followed every one we can.
I really believe that Charlotte Elizabeth either lied about the father or the father was a cousin (the unmarried one perhaps)
and they were not allowed to marry. It said he was a carpenter on the PR
but a waterman on the marriage entry for James Thomas junior.
The family of the unmarried James are all watermen. So you see why we think Charlotte lied. I could go on and on with other vague proof.
But my Worwood cousin has decided to bite the bullet and hire a researcher. WE have a database of BMD's, and IGI, and everything you can think of, and cannot find any marriage, or James Thomas Worwood that fits, except those above. Put it this way we are doing reverse genealogy. If you can't prove something, prove it cannot be anything else. Sigh !!
Sorry for wasting your time hon.
The 1851 census might tie it all together but I have tried every trick in the book to find them another James and Charlotte, either or.
Cheers Pam