RootsChat.Com

Maggie 1895 I know this is an old post but your G Wilson and Mary Ann Leitch were my g g grandparents . His daughter Janet married A Haddow which is my line . George and Mary are in Torryburn churchyard

Wow!  I’ve hardly been on here for a long time but wanted to get back to it as soon as I had time, it’s a brilliant site.  This evening an email alert on this post just came up and now here’s a new cousin... but it’s far too late in the evening to work out how many times removed.   Thank goodness that Scots just say ‘cousins’ and leave it at that!
I’m the gr.granddaughter of James, Margaret’s surviving son, so George’s nephew.  I’d send you a personal message but I seem to remember you need to post 3 times on the board before your ability to use PMs opens.  Reply to this twice!

My great great grandfather was also the same Boys Spicer b 1819, d 1874, I visited Church in Marden & an old man told me old graves were moved some time ago because they wanted easy maintenance. A brother of some people doing some rose care in front of the Church told us some history, I beleive it was from him I leant that a Boys Spicer drowned.  There was a son of this Boys Spicer who was also called Boys, born 1847 so it was this one who drowned They lived & farmed at Chainhurst Farm Marden or Staplehurst. I'm descended from Julia Spicer - daughter of Boys senior.

Amandasqu, So sorry I haven't been on the board for a while and didn't see your post.   Definitely we are cousins, though I'm never sure of how many times removed...
My great grandmother was Mary Ann Spicer, daughter of Boys Spicer (the one who drowned) and Frances Highwood.   I'm very fond of Mary Ann, not only because her photos show a friendly smile and my own mother had lovely memories of her grandmother, but also because I have her tea set, apparently used every Sunday throughout her married life without any breakages.    I wish I could hand it on in the same state, but not confident on that!    Also because it is Mary Ann and her line that lead me to my one and only gateway ancestors (all as detailed earlier in this thread)
According to what I've found building my tree, Mary Ann was the fifth child born in 1851, then came Elizabeth, and then your great grandmother Julia was the seventh born in 1858?   Does that tie in with your information?

I really can't thank you both, and everyone else on this thread, enough.  For the two of you, Priscilla and easterHammer, not just for the information, but also for your kind messages.  I've been off the board for some time, I retired earlier than originally planned, my husband cut down his work abroad, we moved house south to be nearer family and then, 7 weeks ago, my husband died suddenly and very unexpectedly.  I'm now planning to downsize and move again, probably within the next couple of months.
Life happens.  We all know that.   I have a lot of things I need to do, but not much that I want to do or am particularly looking forward to doing, so working through all the information this thread has given me is going to be my treat to myself whenever I can.
I'm still a bit shocked by the connection to the Plantagenet roll - I've always been happy to come from a long line of nobody in particular (though special to me) with absolutely no gateway ancestor within miles.    This is my mother's side of the family, and my father's is pure Scot with family traditions taking us back to one of the many 'wrong side of the blanket' children of The Bruce.    If Edward II really comes into it the idea that the family might have been on both sides at Bannockburn is a bit disconcerting, to say the least...
On the other hand, John of Gaunt and Richard III have always been quite heroic to me, and I read everything I can get my hands on about the Plantagenets and have always the ramifications of Edward III's children and the steps towards the Cousins' Wars fascinating, so it's really exciting.   
Looking at my own tree as far as I had got, the difference to all your information is first and very minor, the name, which I have variously as Simons or Simmons.   I had got the Spicers, and Mary Barton, and gone back to Hester Chilman and her marriage to Boys Simmons,.  There the difference comes in.   I had Hester's father as Stephen Chilman, b 1680 but no note of her mother.
Boys' parents (this is her husband Boys, who I had as b 1723 in Southwark) I have down as the son of William Simmons and 'Elizabeth'.   Elizabeth was work in progress, with possible candidates noted as Ellizabeth Boys or Elizabeth Hughes.    I can't remember at this distance why I had those two surnames for candidates, but going back to that brick wall (it was a brick well for me if not for you) and looking at it in the light of all the information you two have provided is going to give me many interesting hours when I've had enough of downsizing my possessions.   
I'm really interested to see so many mentions of the name Philadelphia.    In the family tree/story book I made for my children a few Christmases ago, I mentioned that my favourite names in the ancestors I had found were Titus Spicer and Philadelphia Simmons or Simons.    That Philadelphis had died age 15, and as far as I remember was buried in St Michael's in Marden.
So much for that line centres around Marden.    My gr.grandfather (different line of my mother's) originally watchmaker/jeweller was the first PostMaster there, and his daughter, my much loved Great Aunt, carried on the post office until she retired at the end of the war.   Seems there was so much more history for us there than ever of us ever realised...
Thank you both again.

Boston 14,
So glad you found what you wanted, and sorry I didn't help.  I got sidetracked - understatement - by moving house and am only just getting back up to speed on FH.
Maggie

Thanks both, I totally agree on Merchant, in that now you've said it it's blindingly obvious!

The first word is confusing me as well though - larger extract as requested