RootsChat.Com

on 1881 census online, we have frederic lavey  publican of the Pelican public house with wife Esther.
frederic was born 1851 at Silchester,Hampshire.
If any one has 1851 hampshire census [or any other census which he may be on]i would be very grateful for any info about him and his family.

incidently, there is a brill site  about pamberheath families:

www.pamberheatharchives.org.uk/peoplegl.htm: 

where i found a bit more of the Laveys.
thanks
jaq

I would much appreciate a look-up for MARY EDWARDS born 1849 at Isleworth Middlesex please.
and / or JAMES DEWEY born 1850 Isleworth Middlesex.
[With this information i'm hoping to link up with a new-found contact]
many thanks
jaq



I have this district info from freebmd:
Created 1st July 1837.
Sub-districts : Acton; Brentford; Chiswick; Hanwell; Isleworth; Twickenham.
GRO volumes : III (1837-51); 3a (1852-1930).
Acton, Chiswick, Ealing, Great Greenford, Hanwell, Heston, Isleworth, New Brentford, Old Brentford, Perivale, Twickenham, Twyford Abbey (from 1862).
Registers now divided between Hounslow, Ealing and Richmond upon Thames districts.

Hi,Does anyone have access to Essex 1871 Harwich area please?
I have traced my Hammond family through 1841.51/61   1881/1891
but am getting impatient awaiting release of the 1871 [the cheaper version from archivecdbooks.org]

this is them in 1861 living in Stour Lodge[Bradfield

HAMMOND   CHARLES   57 born Tendring
HAMMOND   MARY   58 born gt oakley
HAMMOND   ELIZA   26 Bradfield
HAMMOND   JAMES   10 Bradfield
HAMMOND   JOHN   14 Bradfield

i realise that Charles & Mary might not be around in 1871,but its worth a try..please

many thanks
jaq

I get confused sometimes, but found this handyguide somewhere on the web [it was a long time ago]

                   Relationship Rules


The definitions are fairly consistent now.

First cousins have common grandparents,
Second cousins have common great-grandparents,
Third cousins have common great-great-grandparents,
Fourth cousins have common great-great-great-grandparents,
and so on.

The children of cousins are second cousins,
The children of second cousins are third cousins,
The children of third cousins are fourth cousins,
and so on.


For removes:

Your cousin once removed is your cousin's child - ie the removes is how
many generations REMOVED the person is from same level in the tree. The
convention that appears to be used (quite sensibly) is to state the
relationship of the lower level relative to the higher level relative, as
described in the example below:

The relationship of you to your father's cousin is stated by saying that
"you are his/her first cousin once removed".

Technically, but confusingly (and no longer used), that person is your
second cousin once removed as that person is one generation removed from
his/her children, who would be your second cousins.