1
Yorkshire (West Riding) / Richard Gleadall - proof of parentage?
« on: Saturday 15 July 17 13:59 BST (UK) »
“My” Richard Gleadall is fairly consistent with his birthplace of Doncaster, and age, (dob 1814) on all censuses.
I could find no baptism at Doncaster between 1810-1817.
Richard named one of his daughters Dinah, so I searched for a previous Dinah.
Found Diana Gledhill, baptised by Hannah Molloy, reputed father William Gledhill in 1812 at Doncaster.
Searching then for Richard, son of Hannah Molloy – yes!
Baptised Doncaster, 1813, no mention of putative father though.
Hannah Molloy (widow) married William Gledhill (widower) in 1825 at Sheffield.
I believe Hannah was previously married to James Molloy. Unfortunately, the Doncaster burial registers for the period are not in good condition.
William Gleadall died in 1834, buried at Doncaster. Entry shows he was a gardener.
Hannah Gleadall died in 1852, buried at Doncaster. Entry shows she was living at St. James Street, Doncaster.
My Richard Gleadall was a gardener.
In 1851, he was living at St James Street, Doncaster.
Is all this enough proof of Richards parentage do you think?
Thanks for reading,
Yorkslass
I could find no baptism at Doncaster between 1810-1817.
Richard named one of his daughters Dinah, so I searched for a previous Dinah.
Found Diana Gledhill, baptised by Hannah Molloy, reputed father William Gledhill in 1812 at Doncaster.
Searching then for Richard, son of Hannah Molloy – yes!
Baptised Doncaster, 1813, no mention of putative father though.
Hannah Molloy (widow) married William Gledhill (widower) in 1825 at Sheffield.
I believe Hannah was previously married to James Molloy. Unfortunately, the Doncaster burial registers for the period are not in good condition.
William Gleadall died in 1834, buried at Doncaster. Entry shows he was a gardener.
Hannah Gleadall died in 1852, buried at Doncaster. Entry shows she was living at St. James Street, Doncaster.
My Richard Gleadall was a gardener.
In 1851, he was living at St James Street, Doncaster.
Is all this enough proof of Richards parentage do you think?
Thanks for reading,
Yorkslass