Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Betty S

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 18
1
Cork / Re: Co Cork parish records GOOLD family
« on: Friday 30 October 20 00:13 GMT (UK)  »
Thank you so much Debra, I only posted this about an hour ago and yours is the 2nd reply....Are these sites great!I shall look into the Goold family for a friend, so this will be another lead to follow.
Thanks again,
Betty S

2
Cork / Co Cork parish records GOOLD family
« on: Thursday 29 October 20 22:23 GMT (UK)  »
I am looking for the parents and siblings of James Alipius Goold, b.04 Nov 1912 Co Cork, who became Archbishop of Melbourne Australia. He died 11 June  1886 in Brighton Victoria Australia.

3
Ayrshire / Re: JanetMackie death
« on: Thursday 07 June 18 23:28 BST (UK)  »
Thanks  for your replies, Rosie, Isobel & Caroline.....I usually don't take to much notice of other trees on Ancestry....that why I bought her DC........but, the info I have was given to me years ago (by someone who I find is usually very good and has certs. to back up his claims)) and he had information from other members of that family who assured him that this was correct....it has always intrigued me &  I reviewed that part of my tree recently and thought I must delve further......Thanks again to you all....
BettyS

4
Ayrshire / JanetMackie death
« on: Thursday 07 June 18 08:18 BST (UK)  »
I have a Death cert. for Janet Clark Mackie, who died in Kilmarnock Aye on 13 Dec 1891.she was married to William Mackie.
My problem is that , if I have the correct info. she also married Walter Granger, a Bishop of LDS, and they say she died on that date , but in Tulare California.
Can some kind person please explain?
Betty Sheather

5
Australia / Re: Query re relationship
« on: Wednesday 16 May 18 09:27 BST (UK)  »
Thanks for your replies, majm......is it a funny way of saying that there might be a connection? anyway it can't be a close connection!
Every time I look at the sentence I groan!!!!
So thanks again for your humorous remarks!!!!
Betty S

6
Australia / Re: Query re relationship
« on: Wednesday 16 May 18 08:30 BST (UK)  »
Thanks for your quick reply.......I agree....on the Ancestry FT, it will say " no direct relationship"  and I just happened to notice this other message and I wanted to see if we were connected to this family.

But thanks for your help. I think I will just claim there MIGHT be a connection, but not an actual relationship......
Regards
Betty S

7
Australia / Query re relationship
« on: Wednesday 16 May 18 07:50 BST (UK)  »
I am trying to work out a relationship in my Family tree......according to ancestry the person I am looking at is" the wife of the husband of the sister in law of the uncle of the wife of the uncle"

It  keeps going round and round in my head and cannot make sense of it........is there some kind, clever,  person out there who can help????????
Betty S

8
Australia / Re: Mary Emma CROW /John SKINNER
« on: Tuesday 13 September 16 23:24 BST (UK)  »
Thanks for that info. Randall,......this is a very interesting family......I only started looking into them because of the Macleod connections...
Betty S

9
Australia / Re: Mary Emma CROW /John SKINNER
« on: Thursday 08 September 16 03:17 BST (UK)  »
Oh!!!Jamjar, my apologies!!!! I think I thanked Randall instead of you! 
Mea culpa!
Betty S
PS I was getting so much info. so fast that when I went to reply there were more  messages coming in!

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 18