1
Westmeath / Re: Another child, but what became of her?
« on: Thursday 08 February 24 09:02 GMT (UK) »Unless Bridget was Mary. Which is possible....
[/quote/]
She could be - sister Rose was known to everyone as Paddy
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Unless Bridget was Mary. Which is possible....
[/quote/]
She could be - sister Rose was known to everyone as Paddy
Happy Christmas
I have been researching my son in laws mothers tree for her 75th birthday in January. It has been a bit of a rush and so have only gone back a few generations. The original surname is Urch. In my search I came across an ancestry member in the Urch tree with a DNA match to me!!! Obviously this was a huge shock, so I emailed the person but they did not reply. It states 5th to 8th cousin 8cM across 1 seg.
Can anyone explain this please.
Also if I now go back to my tree and look at the extended tree going backwards cousins etc should I in theory come across a connection?
I have already found a 1xcousin 3 x removed in my tree that marries an Urch but he is not in my son in laws tree at the moment.
Lastly I have bought my son in law a DNA kit to see if it comes up that we are actually related, if it is the case I was thinking of hiring someone to look at it for me. Any recommendations from who I might use?
Hope this makes sense
Sue
The 1950-1964 time she had her name changed by Depoll to Bayliss.