1
Family History Beginners Board / Re: Where are the boundaries of my tree?
« on: Thursday 05 July 07 14:42 BST (UK) »
I take a practical point of view. Pick the part of your family you are interested in and work back to the earliest direct ancestor who you can still find on a census, with some of his/her family. From that point I work downwards, researching all the children and children's chilren that I can. Then going back I tend to stick with the direct line and siblings only, principally because it gets a lot harder to trace forwards.
This method also makes it easier to display on a tree, you have a descendancy tree from someone born about 1810, with lots of branches, so you can see where the rest of your clan dispersed to, but you also get levels going back so you can see your origins.
You may find there are several of these families fromthe mid nineteenth century that you want to research, in which case you just have several trees. I consider mine as different families even though they are combined by about 1910. I lbel them according t othe prinicpal family name, even if this isn't entirely accurate (for example I have a CLARK and a CLARKE family, although both families used both surnames interchangably)
This method also makes it easier to display on a tree, you have a descendancy tree from someone born about 1810, with lots of branches, so you can see where the rest of your clan dispersed to, but you also get levels going back so you can see your origins.
You may find there are several of these families fromthe mid nineteenth century that you want to research, in which case you just have several trees. I consider mine as different families even though they are combined by about 1910. I lbel them according t othe prinicpal family name, even if this isn't entirely accurate (for example I have a CLARK and a CLARKE family, although both families used both surnames interchangably)