Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - rosieM

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 14
1
Derbyshire Lookup Requests / Re: Bramwell form Chesterfield
« on: Friday 16 February 24 22:04 GMT (UK)  »
Oh thank you. I had someone else give me something along the same lines. Dreadfully sad. Mary Alice was my grandfather's sister.
So we are kin 😁 xx

2
The Common Room / Re: death record
« on: Wednesday 21 June 23 21:42 BST (UK)  »
By "death record" do you mean a death certificate, an entry in the GRO deaths index, or a parish burial register? Or something else?

I can't think of any reason for "omitted" to appear on a death certificate or the GRO index, but it's sometimes seen in a parish register where an entry has been overlooked and is then inserted out of the proper order.


Thank you.  That makes sense as it was a parish register in Norfolk England.  Id never come across that before. As it was a suicide I thought it might have another meaning. Im sorry if I asked on the wrong page. I seem to always get it wrong on this  site however had i try  lol

3
The Common Room / Re: death record
« on: Wednesday 21 June 23 21:35 BST (UK)  »
Sorry, I never thought of all that  ::) Im a senior and having taken a long break am a bit rusty.
It was in Norfolk England, and solved being a parish entry.
Ill try to remember in future  :)
Thank you

4
The Common Room / death record
« on: Wednesday 21 June 23 16:55 BST (UK)  »
Can someone kindly tell me why it might have , what looks like 'Omitted' written at the side of  a death entry?
Thanks

5
The Common Room / Re: Alfred Ambrose Stokeley
« on: Thursday 20 January 22 15:05 GMT (UK)  »
Hi,
Can anyone shed any light on where this man was before 1911?  He gives birth in Brisely Norfolk about 1864 on that Census and they are living Kings Lynn Norfolk. But search as I might I can't find him prior to this. He is with Martha Manning (Maybe wife) but no record. She was wed to a John William Green 1887 who died around the turn of the century I think, aged 34. And in 1911 she is still 35 despite being so 10 years before.
Its said that each time she had a child it depended on what mood she was in as to what name they were registered. Some Green some Stokeley (diff spellings). And some cannot be Greens by simple deduction.  Where did Alfred Ambrose Stokeley come from?
Thanks in advance for any enlightenment. :)

6
The Common Room / Re: Alfred Ambrose Stokeley
« on: Sunday 24 October 21 18:01 BST (UK)  »
There is a tree on Ancestry showing his parents as John & Susannah.  It also shows John's parents as Trafalgar & Mary

There is an 1861 marriage on freebmd - John Stoakley to Susanna Allison Howell.

However - GRO online confirms that Frederick William Stokeley & Albert Howell Stokeley were born to that marriage so the info on the tree linking Alfred Ambrose Stokeley to those parents is wrong.  In 1871 John plus both children are with Trafalgar & Mary but no Susanna although John is shown as married

Susanna is with her parents plus 5yr old daughter Sophia

I will  message the tree owner with the link to this post as he appears to be interested in Alfred Ambrose

Oh only just realised you posted this Carole. Yes. I can see I was on the wrong track. Thank you. Alfred Ambrose is a hard man to find  :o

7
The Common Room / Re: Alfred Ambrose Stokeley
« on: Sunday 24 October 21 17:59 BST (UK)  »
There is a Fred Stokeley with wife Clara in 1901 at Red Lion, Brisley
RG13/Piece 1875 folio7 page 5
https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:XSFR-8T3
Fred is 37 born Brisley and Clara is 30. 

In 1911 Clara is a servant (Married) in Brisley but her husband is not in the household  ::)
https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:X7R9-HGG

Clara died in 1920.

There is a Alfred Stokeley who could be him living with grandparents on 1871/81 census in Brisley

Will have to leave this for now

rosie99 where was the Alfred living with Grandparents please? I can't find any with an Alfred? Thank you

8
The Common Room / Re: Alfred Ambrose Stokeley
« on: Saturday 23 October 21 17:06 BST (UK)  »
Quote
I think the Frédérick who wed Clara could have been a younger brother of Alfred.

I don't think he was connected to Alfred.  Alfred was 47 in 1911 so born 1863-64.  If he was connected - why is he not with either John or Susanna in 1871?  Where is his birth reg?

1861 June qtr STOKELEY  ALBERT  HOWELL  mmn    HOWELL     
MITFORD  Volume 04B  Page 291
   
December qtr 1863 STOKELY, FREDERICK  WILLIAM mmn     HOWELL     
MITFORD  Volume 04B  Page 290

1866  Sept qtr STOKELY, MARY  SOPHIA  mmn    HOWELL     
MITFORD  Volume 04B  Page 267

OmGoodness you are right. Though, thinking on it, Rosie99 did say something about being with grandparents 71/81. I found trafalgar and Mary by that. Possibility?
I really appreciate the time you mods give. Thanks.

9
The Common Room / Re: Alfred Ambrose Stokeley
« on: Saturday 23 October 21 16:06 BST (UK)  »
That could be Frederick William Stokeley who married Clara Elizabeth Willmerson in Dec qtr 1891

Yeah Carole, I did think that when I looked into it. Can't see any Alfred for for John Stokeley, who I found to be the son of Mary and Trafalgar Stokeley. But has I can only find him and Susanah, or Susan before and after 1864 I can't tell if they had Alfred Ambrose. He would have been left home on the later census maybe. Its likely the right family.. Only ones for Brisley at right time. I'll just keep digging. I think the Frédérick who wed Clara could have been a younger brother of Alfred.
Much more to go on than I had.
Thanks very much. And if anything else springs up please pass it my way  :)

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 14