Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Sueh2

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 64
1
Family History Beginners Board / Re: 1921 Marriage
« on: Wednesday 04 May 22 14:54 BST (UK)  »
Thanks for all your suggestions and offers of help but as I said earlier I don’t want to post the name as it might upset a closer living relative.

Thanks anyway

Sue

2
Family History Beginners Board / Re: 1921 Marriage
« on: Wednesday 04 May 22 13:02 BST (UK)  »
Yes, I have tried that but nothing really jumps out as interesting. I have followed up a few which seemed to be a vague maybe but no luck.

Thanks for your interest

3
Family History Beginners Board / Re: 1921 Marriage
« on: Monday 02 May 22 22:07 BST (UK)  »
Thanks for your reply. I have tried thinking “out of the box” but still no luck. We genealogists like a challenge..

4
Armed Forces / Re: Royal Naval Wives
« on: Sunday 01 May 22 16:21 BST (UK)  »
Thank you John, this is what I thought

5
Family History Beginners Board / Re: 1921 Marriage
« on: Saturday 30 April 22 08:20 BST (UK)  »
Thanks everyone, I have her date of birth from 1939 and have her in 1911 and 1921.

BUT I cannot find her birth registration……. I am suspicious and don’t want to post her name so as not to cause any offence to living family. The other sibling born 8 years later is registered and baptised which I find odd.

So I was wondering whether she might at any time have needed her birth certificate like when she got married.

6
Armed Forces / Royal Naval Wives
« on: Friday 29 April 22 11:58 BST (UK)  »
Hi,

Bit of an odd query but someone might know.

If a husband was on board a RN ship at the China Station for several years (1900-1903) would he have returned to the UK on leave?

Also did the wives ever go to join their husbands?

Thanks

7
Family History Beginners Board / Re: 1921 Marriage
« on: Friday 29 April 22 11:51 BST (UK)  »
I realise that it was easy in the 1800s to just state that you were of full age for marriage without having to provide any proof. Also to change your name or marital status was easy once you were outside an area in which you were known was easy since no proof was needed.

I just wondered at what point a bride and groom were required to prove their ages and names. I have a early 1920s marriage, but cannot find the bride’s birth registration despite knowing all about her parents and grandparents and thought that she might have needed her birth certificate to get married.


8
Family History Beginners Board / 1921 Marriage
« on: Thursday 28 April 22 23:48 BST (UK)  »
Would a couple getting married in the 1920s have needed to show their birth certificates to the vicar or registrar before the ceremony could take place?


9
The Common Room / Re: OK I give up!
« on: Thursday 14 April 22 11:43 BST (UK)  »
Just had a further look at John Perry, he became the postmaster in Stratton which I imagine was quite a respected position within the community

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 64